ImageImageImage

Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
DK-All Day
General Manager
Posts: 9,746
And1: 8,458
Joined: Oct 12, 2013
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1841 » by DK-All Day » Thu May 18, 2017 8:36 pm

Unpopular opinion, but I don't want to give IT a 5 yr max. Once he slows down on offense and gets even worse on d he could become an albatross. Offer him an extension this summer, if he declines, you know what to do.
Handsome.
User avatar
jmr07019
General Manager
Posts: 8,715
And1: 8,788
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
       

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1842 » by jmr07019 » Thu May 18, 2017 8:36 pm

The issue is after 2 years porzingis is due an extension and the money gets really tight. I think it's better to do Fultz + AB for Zinger + 7. Replacing Bradley with 7 gives you 3 years of a substantially lower contract and you should be able to get a guard who can contribute at 7. Either Fox, DSJ, Frank or Monk will be there.
Show Love Spread Love
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1843 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Thu May 18, 2017 8:38 pm

You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,185
And1: 15,051
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1844 » by 165bows » Thu May 18, 2017 8:39 pm

Merging this into the trade thread.
bigfoot_cryptozoology
Head Coach
Posts: 6,369
And1: 5,697
Joined: Jun 21, 2002

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1845 » by bigfoot_cryptozoology » Thu May 18, 2017 8:54 pm

Froob wrote:Waiting for somebody to suggest the #1 pick for Dragan Bender.


Bender & 4 for 1 isn't something that should be quickly dismissed.
Depends on what you see Bender becoming?

If he turns into a Multidimensional Unicorn then 3 - 5 years down the road you are going to be very happy
you made the trade especially with the 4th pick in this draft likely being a quality player or Star in their own right. :)
User avatar
AgentGreen
Head Coach
Posts: 6,940
And1: 3,481
Joined: Feb 12, 2013
Location: Greentown
     

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1846 » by AgentGreen » Thu May 18, 2017 9:14 pm

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.


AD would cost us way more. No way the Pels do it for the 2017 1st overall pick only.
Image
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,439
And1: 15,539
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1847 » by bucknersrevenge » Thu May 18, 2017 9:40 pm

DK-All Day wrote:Unpopular opinion, but I don't want to give IT a 5 yr max. Once he slows down on offense and gets even worse on d he could become an albatross. Offer him an extension this summer, if he declines, you know what to do.


Don't think it's really that unpopular or that unreasonable. With Fultz coming aboard he can play understudy for a couple of years learning. Maybe even another as a starter. I don't think it takes more than 2 seasons for him to make a major impact on this team. But he gets to come to an environment and not have to save a franchise right away. By that time IT would be in maybe his 3rd year of said deal. If you like him you can keep him. If not, someone will want him with 2 years remaining on his deal by then. Just don't want the 5th year. And if that becomes the hill he dies on, then he dies.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1848 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Thu May 18, 2017 9:41 pm

AgentGreen wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.


AD would cost us way more. No way the Pels do it for the 2017 1st overall pick only.

i'm not saying you don't add, I'm just saying thats the only player in my mind that is worth relinquishing this pick for. I'm really not sure you guys have a good understanding of how valuable this particular pick is.

This isn't andrew friccin wiggins for love type #1 pick, this is of far far far far far far far far far far far greater value than anyone outside the NBA business circles can comprehend.
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1849 » by Slartibartfast » Thu May 18, 2017 9:45 pm

DK-All Day wrote:Unpopular opinion, but I don't want to give IT a 5 yr max. Once he slows down on offense and gets even worse on d he could become an albatross. Offer him an extension this summer, if he declines, you know what to do.


Something like a 3 year max to sync with Fultz' rookie scale would make the most sense to me, though I'm not an IT fan.
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1850 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Thu May 18, 2017 9:47 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:
DK-All Day wrote:Unpopular opinion, but I don't want to give IT a 5 yr max. Once he slows down on offense and gets even worse on d he could become an albatross. Offer him an extension this summer, if he declines, you know what to do.


Something like a 3 year max to sync with Fultz' rookie scale would make the most sense to me, though I'm not an IT fan.

you have to to retain the value, you just have to.
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1851 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu May 18, 2017 9:48 pm

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.


Maybe. Sounds like FO is very very high on taking and developing Fultz.

I'd say Porzingis, 7, and NYK '18 unprotected would make me stop and think.

If we do take Fultz, and have IT/Fultz/Rozier/Smart/Bradley as the guards, what next?

Bradley seems like the one who goes, if you can replace his secondary scoring with Rozier, Fultz and Smart, and his defense with Smart and Rozier. For a big? For a mid-lotto pick, like to Minnesota to take Zach Collins? Bradley/Crowder for Jimmy Butler?
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1852 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu May 18, 2017 9:49 pm

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.


AD would cost us way more. No way the Pels do it for the 2017 1st overall pick only.

i'm not saying you don't add, I'm just saying thats the only player in my mind that is worth relinquishing this pick for. I'm really not sure you guys have a good understanding of how valuable this particular pick is.

This isn't andrew friccin wiggins for love type #1 pick, this is of far far far far far far far far far far far greater value than anyone outside the NBA business circles can comprehend.


You think Fultz is that good/special?
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,439
And1: 15,539
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1853 » by bucknersrevenge » Thu May 18, 2017 9:49 pm

With things lining up for us now to bring in Fultz and hopefully Hayward, the only real intrigue is how do we thin the herd at the wing spot?

AB, Jae, Marcus, Terry, JB, and don't forget DJax and Nader (who I thought acquitted himself quite well in the D-League and showed that he could at least take Gerald's spot next year if not more)

Have to think no way Brown goes anywhere but if he doesn't, and we add Gordon, that's really gonna squeeze Jae's minutes. Fultz is really gonna squeeze Marcus and Terry's minutes. And of course Avery's 20M extension is looming in the background.

We all want a skilled big to come in here. So who's available and what are the trades to get it done? I've got Vucevic, O'Quinn, maybe Monroe, Trevor Booker, Noel (if you think Cuban wouldn't resign him), not sure who else.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1854 » by Slartibartfast » Thu May 18, 2017 9:50 pm

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
DK-All Day wrote:Unpopular opinion, but I don't want to give IT a 5 yr max. Once he slows down on offense and gets even worse on d he could become an albatross. Offer him an extension this summer, if he declines, you know what to do.


Something like a 3 year max to sync with Fultz' rookie scale would make the most sense to me, though I'm not an IT fan.

you have to to retain the value, you just have to.


I'd prefer to trade him to Dallas for that #9 pick (I love Zach Collins even more than I loved Myles Turner), but if we're not going to give up on the short-term, I just want to avoid having him and Fultz maxed at the same time.
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1855 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Thu May 18, 2017 9:51 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:
AD would cost us way more. No way the Pels do it for the 2017 1st overall pick only.

i'm not saying you don't add, I'm just saying thats the only player in my mind that is worth relinquishing this pick for. I'm really not sure you guys have a good understanding of how valuable this particular pick is.

This isn't andrew friccin wiggins for love type #1 pick, this is of far far far far far far far far far far far greater value than anyone outside the NBA business circles can comprehend.


You think Fultz is that good/special?

almost everybody does.
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1856 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Thu May 18, 2017 9:52 pm

so many of the things that Fultz does, you can't "practice" you can't "work on" you can't "get better at" they are things you either can or cannot do, and thats what separates superstars from stars and starters.
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,439
And1: 15,539
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1857 » by bucknersrevenge » Thu May 18, 2017 9:54 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:
AD would cost us way more. No way the Pels do it for the 2017 1st overall pick only.

i'm not saying you don't add, I'm just saying thats the only player in my mind that is worth relinquishing this pick for. I'm really not sure you guys have a good understanding of how valuable this particular pick is.

This isn't andrew friccin wiggins for love type #1 pick, this is of far far far far far far far far far far far greater value than anyone outside the NBA business circles can comprehend.


You think Fultz is that good/special?


I do. At 19, he's the best PnR guard to enter the league since Irving. And he's more tailor-made for the way the game now than Irving was when he came out. Take all that he did at 19 and consider that he did it in maybe the worst offense ever constructed with literally no talent around him. He is a proficient scorer at all 3 levels. His defensive potential is immense with his measurable and his wingspan. Plus he may be 6'5 now. You take him, you lock him up for the next 10 years and you don't look back.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
User avatar
AgentGreen
Head Coach
Posts: 6,940
And1: 3,481
Joined: Feb 12, 2013
Location: Greentown
     

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1858 » by AgentGreen » Thu May 18, 2017 10:17 pm

LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:You guya have no clue if you think this pick is worth anything other than AD. Thats it. Theres nothing more worth it.


AD would cost us way more. No way the Pels do it for the 2017 1st overall pick only.

i'm not saying you don't add, I'm just saying thats the only player in my mind that is worth relinquishing this pick for. I'm really not sure you guys have a good understanding of how valuable this particular pick is.

This isn't andrew friccin wiggins for love type #1 pick, this is of far far far far far far far far far far far greater value than anyone outside the NBA business circles can comprehend.


Well to each his own then. I'm not that high on Fultz like some of you over here.. Dont see big superstar potential in him.
Image
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Trade #1 Pick for Porzingis? 

Post#1859 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Thu May 18, 2017 10:33 pm

AgentGreen wrote:
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:
AgentGreen wrote:
AD would cost us way more. No way the Pels do it for the 2017 1st overall pick only.

i'm not saying you don't add, I'm just saying thats the only player in my mind that is worth relinquishing this pick for. I'm really not sure you guys have a good understanding of how valuable this particular pick is.

This isn't andrew friccin wiggins for love type #1 pick, this is of far far far far far far far far far far far greater value than anyone outside the NBA business circles can comprehend.


Well to each his own then. I'm not that high on Fultz like some of you over here.. Dont see big superstar potential in him.

i'm just not so sure you can say that considering he is doing things nobody else coming out of college has in decades
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Krkrich
Senior
Posts: 535
And1: 419
Joined: Nov 07, 2013
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1860 » by Krkrich » Thu May 18, 2017 11:23 pm

the anticipation is going to kill me. Just wish I could fast forward and see what the team does.

I'm one of those fans who gets attached to our players. I would really hate to see IT or AB go

Return to Boston Celtics