2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion
Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- iamworthy
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,137
- And1: 8,916
- Joined: Jul 20, 2007
- Location: Ring City!!!
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,100
- And1: 4,968
- Joined: Jul 03, 2016
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
The Lakers are smart!!
The Lakers do not have enough assets right now and have a heavy salary structure with Deng/Moz. They have to work this and every opportunity to add assets. With this report out, I think other teams that had the Lakers penciled as selecting Ball will have to revise and see what is needed. The teams that wanted Fox, Jackson, Tatum and even Monk, Isaac, DSJ, Markkanen might have to trade up. This and the news of Clarkson opens up opportunities for trades. In the end, if there is nothing and Ball is the best player available, we will select him as he is the most logical fit.
Go Magic, Pelinka and West!!
The Lakers do not have enough assets right now and have a heavy salary structure with Deng/Moz. They have to work this and every opportunity to add assets. With this report out, I think other teams that had the Lakers penciled as selecting Ball will have to revise and see what is needed. The teams that wanted Fox, Jackson, Tatum and even Monk, Isaac, DSJ, Markkanen might have to trade up. This and the news of Clarkson opens up opportunities for trades. In the end, if there is nothing and Ball is the best player available, we will select him as he is the most logical fit.
Go Magic, Pelinka and West!!
Not Yo Ham Lakers!
The Don and The King!
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,100
- And1: 4,968
- Joined: Jul 03, 2016
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Not Yo Ham Lakers!
The Don and The King!
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- iamworthy
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,137
- And1: 8,916
- Joined: Jul 20, 2007
- Location: Ring City!!!
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Ummm who is this!?
Edit: draft express mock draft have him going 29th to the Spurs.... Take him at 28?

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,100
- And1: 4,968
- Joined: Jul 03, 2016
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
iamworthy wrote:
Ummm who is this!?
Edit: draft express mock draft have him going 29th to the Spurs.... Take him at 28?
7'2" 21 year old and top 5 rated international player. He is projected as a late first rounder but his value might have went up 5 picks now. He has a developing 3 point range too...
Not Yo Ham Lakers!
The Don and The King!
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,660
- And1: 23,966
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Well Ramona did say a couple of weeks ago that it was 50/50 and she has legit inside sources. So yeah not a sure thing he goes to the Lakers. Problem is I'm not sure I want to take a chance on Jackson or Fox. Fox does not fit with Russell at all who is a much better playmaker and shooter.
Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,843
- And1: 6,198
- Joined: Dec 16, 2013
- Location: Right here waiting for you
Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
Jordan SchultzVerified account @Schultz_Report 2h2 hours ago
Per source, re Lonzo Ball: "It's not even close right now. Ball won't be a Laker unless they really start 2 buy into him as a star." #lakers
listening to 97.5 came across the airwaves thought I should share
Per source, re Lonzo Ball: "It's not even close right now. Ball won't be a Laker unless they really start 2 buy into him as a star." #lakers
listening to 97.5 came across the airwaves thought I should share
Re: Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
Possible that the decision not to workout against Fox might have upset the front office.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Fox is probably also going to kill it in the interviews compared to the others.
Re: Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
- SashaTheMachine
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,641
- And1: 1,384
- Joined: Jun 17, 2012
-
Re: Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
I think this is puro $hit
Re: RE: Re: Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
- XXBKXX
- Senior
- Posts: 611
- And1: 254
- Joined: Nov 11, 2016
-
Re: RE: Re: Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
Michael Lucky wrote:Possible that the decision not to workout against Fox might have upset the front office.
I can't imagine magic and Rob really thought that Lonzo and his agent would have actually allowed him to work out against another prospect. It just doesn't happen --- especially that high in the draft. Most of the times teams are lucky to even get them to do a physical workout instead of just an interview. (Remember how
With that said. I'm hoping they're looking at Jackson. I've said this before but having Ingram and Jackson on the wings should solidify our sf/sg positions for the next 15 years. That could be an elite pairing in my opinion. Might not even need Paul George next year if we go this route. Unless we try Brandon at the four.
I think Dennis Smith Jr is the best pg in the draft, and Jackson is the best wing player in the draft.5 Fox can be a good player but he has too much of rondo/elfrid Payton in him imo.
Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app
BK
-----------------------
Lakers / Angels / Dolphins
-----------------------
Lakers / Angels / Dolphins
Re: Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,802
- And1: 2,492
- Joined: Jan 21, 2012
Re: Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
At least workout Josh Jackson. I'd take him over Fox anyday.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,253
- And1: 9,958
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
This Schultz guy is just embarrassing himself.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: Lakers low on Ball high on Fox?
According to Schultz multiple lottery teams think Fox is better than Fultz or Ball. If that is even remotely true, i can't remember the last time a players stock went so high based on one game.
I doubt that if they passed over Lonzo it would be for Jackson. Mainly because he plays the same position as Ingram and George. Ingram being the so called untouchable. None of those guys should be playing the 2. Also there's been reports ever since the lottery that the Lakers love Fox.
Kupchak9 wrote:At least workout Josh Jackson. I'd take him over Fox anyday.
I doubt that if they passed over Lonzo it would be for Jackson. Mainly because he plays the same position as Ingram and George. Ingram being the so called untouchable. None of those guys should be playing the 2. Also there's been reports ever since the lottery that the Lakers love Fox.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,785
- And1: 32,156
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- TylersLakers
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,961
- And1: 2,867
- Joined: Jan 20, 2006
- Location: Winnipeg Canada
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
TyCobb wrote:This Schultz guy is just embarrassing himself.
Yup, sounds like a trash report.

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- TylersLakers
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,961
- And1: 2,867
- Joined: Jan 20, 2006
- Location: Winnipeg Canada
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
I'll also make a guarantee regarding Fox: The front office that drafts him will be fired within 12 months time.

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- Worst_to_First
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,740
- And1: 9,645
- Joined: Feb 25, 2015
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Lakers management shouldn't outsmart themselves with this pick and I do not think they will.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- iamworthy
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,137
- And1: 8,916
- Joined: Jul 20, 2007
- Location: Ring City!!!
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
TylersLakers wrote:I'll also make a guarantee regarding Fox: The front office that drafts him will be fired within 12 months time.
This is a bit much. Here's where he's slated on various sites:
Draftexpress 5th
Draftnet: 4th
Bleacher Report: 4th
Where would you take him?
