2017 Lakers Draft Pick Discussion
Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
liveod
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,292
- And1: 1,082
- Joined: Mar 28, 2011
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
There's less than a 1% chance the C's draft Lonzo.
Celtics_Champs wrote:Abby Chin always looks good. She blocked me on Twitter and to this day I have no idea and I never said anything to her. One day I will see her on sidelines and ask her why oh why.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
TyCobb
- Forum Mod - Lakers

- Posts: 38,253
- And1: 9,958
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Of course not. Why would you draft someone who is leaving the first chance he gets in FA?
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
Michael Lucky
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
TyCobb wrote:Of course not. Why would you draft someone who is leaving the first chance he gets in FA?
He would only be able to leave after 8 seasons, so i don't see that being a huge worry. The main reasons why they wouldn't draft Lonzo are 1, Fultz is better and 2 it forces Boston's hand with Isaiah.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
TyCobb
- Forum Mod - Lakers

- Posts: 38,253
- And1: 9,958
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Michael Lucky wrote:TyCobb wrote:Of course not. Why would you draft someone who is leaving the first chance he gets in FA?
He would only be able to leave after 8 seasons, so i don't see that being a huge worry.
Greg Monroe?
The Warriors got the next 5-6 on lock... so?
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
Michael Lucky
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
TyCobb wrote:Michael Lucky wrote:TyCobb wrote:Of course not. Why would you draft someone who is leaving the first chance he gets in FA?
He would only be able to leave after 8 seasons, so i don't see that being a huge worry.
Greg Monroe?
The Warriors got the next 5-6 on lock... so?
what about an insignificant player like Greg Monroe who was taking playing time away from Drummond?
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
TyCobb
- Forum Mod - Lakers

- Posts: 38,253
- And1: 9,958
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
Michael Lucky
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
The guaranteed financial security that would be lost out on would make this very unlikely even if Lonzo didn't want to be there. Monroe did this because he wasn't getting the contract extension he wanted. If Lonzo plays well, i really doubt that would happen as well.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
TyCobb
- Forum Mod - Lakers

- Posts: 38,253
- And1: 9,958
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
If there is anyone who chooses ideal situation over money, it's the Ball family.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
Michael Lucky
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Yet, Lavar seems pretty obsessed by it.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- 51X3RF4N
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,159
- And1: 935
- Joined: Feb 14, 2008
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Your Future Sixers
C- Embiid/?
PF- ?/?
SF- ?/?
SG- ?/?
PG- ?/?
C- Embiid/?
PF- ?/?
SF- ?/?
SG- ?/?
PG- ?/?
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
TyCobb
- Forum Mod - Lakers

- Posts: 38,253
- And1: 9,958
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Am I the source?
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
taj2133
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,504
- And1: 2,972
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Lonzo Ball Doing Desperate Second Workout With Lakers, Who May Have Already Promised Josh Jackson
213
SHARES
SHARE
TWEET
EMAIL
By: Stephen Douglas | 2 hours ago
Josh Jackson may have been given a promise ring by either the Los Angeles Lakers or Philadelphia 76ers according to some tweets and the process of elimination.
Follow
John Gambadoro ✔ @Gambo987
Josh Jackson has been promised - has worked out for Lakers in LA. Has not worked out for Phoenix yet. It could be Philly but likely Lakers.
2:02 PM - 12 Jun 2017
273 273 Retweets 370 370 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Jackson canceled a workout with the Boston Celtics. That could be because they have no interest or may be because they’re trading the pick so it would be a waste of everyone’s time. As for Phoenix, maybe Jackson doesn’t want to go there. Or maybe the Suns are just optimistic about Lonzo Ball dropping to them. Or some third thing.
Either way, it looks like Jackson is planning on going to Philly or L.A. If he expects to be a Laker, that’s bad news for the Ball family. And if they’ve heard these rumors maybe that’s why Lonzo Ball is going to have a second workout with the Lakers to show them how serious he is about working out and training. Some people reportedly thought he was a little out of shape at his first workout.
Follow
Ramona Shelburne ✔ @ramonashelburne
Lonzo Ball's 2nd workout with the Lakers will be at an undisclosed location on Fri. He wants them to see his work ethic& training methods
8:12 PM - 14 Jun 2017
176 176 Retweets 394 394 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
A week out from the draft and it seems no one knows who is going anywhere. Except Jason McIntyre.
Boston Celtics, Commentary, Josh Jackson, Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers, Philadelphia 76ers, NBA
http://thebiglead.com/2017/06/14/lonzo-ball-doing-desperate-second-workout-with-lakers-who-may-have-already-promised-josh-jackson/
213
SHARES
SHARE
TWEET
By: Stephen Douglas | 2 hours ago
Josh Jackson may have been given a promise ring by either the Los Angeles Lakers or Philadelphia 76ers according to some tweets and the process of elimination.
Follow
John Gambadoro ✔ @Gambo987
Josh Jackson has been promised - has worked out for Lakers in LA. Has not worked out for Phoenix yet. It could be Philly but likely Lakers.
2:02 PM - 12 Jun 2017
273 273 Retweets 370 370 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Jackson canceled a workout with the Boston Celtics. That could be because they have no interest or may be because they’re trading the pick so it would be a waste of everyone’s time. As for Phoenix, maybe Jackson doesn’t want to go there. Or maybe the Suns are just optimistic about Lonzo Ball dropping to them. Or some third thing.
Either way, it looks like Jackson is planning on going to Philly or L.A. If he expects to be a Laker, that’s bad news for the Ball family. And if they’ve heard these rumors maybe that’s why Lonzo Ball is going to have a second workout with the Lakers to show them how serious he is about working out and training. Some people reportedly thought he was a little out of shape at his first workout.
Follow
Ramona Shelburne ✔ @ramonashelburne
Lonzo Ball's 2nd workout with the Lakers will be at an undisclosed location on Fri. He wants them to see his work ethic& training methods
8:12 PM - 14 Jun 2017
176 176 Retweets 394 394 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
A week out from the draft and it seems no one knows who is going anywhere. Except Jason McIntyre.
Boston Celtics, Commentary, Josh Jackson, Lonzo Ball, Los Angeles Lakers, Philadelphia 76ers, NBA
http://thebiglead.com/2017/06/14/lonzo-ball-doing-desperate-second-workout-with-lakers-who-may-have-already-promised-josh-jackson/
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
Michael Lucky
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
I'll wait to see a more credible source on that. 76ers fans already dicrediting the source.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
ozymandias818
- Sophomore
- Posts: 171
- And1: 48
- Joined: Jul 17, 2014
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Pythagoras wrote:ozymandias818 wrote:Michael Lucky wrote:Not sure how you come to that conclusion when Jackson plays the same position as Ingram. The last thing you want is Clarkson running the point and have no playmakers left on the roster.
And Ball plays the same position as Russell. What's your point?
The difference is that playing them together wouldn't be a waste, like it would putting a passer of Russell's caliber at a different position so you can play two guys that don't play defense. Jackson was a college freshman. He's fully capable of developing a reliable jumper. You can play Jackson and a bulked Ingram next to each other at the forward spots with ease 3 years from now and have them both dominate on both ends of the floor.
I'd rather the Lakers draft Ball or trade the pick for the right price, but your reasoning doesn't make any sense.
Jackson's jumper issues are every bit as real as Ball and D'Lo's defensive concerns.
No. D'lo will never be a good defender. There are plenty of players that came out of college with 0 jumper and developed a very good one.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
- BEazy
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,101
- And1: 2,497
- Joined: Aug 06, 2010
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
If we come out with Ball and Jackson at the expense of Dlo, I'm very open to that.

Long Live The Black Mamba. Kobe Bean Bryant Laker For Life. 8/24
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
Michael Lucky
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Yeah until Russell averages 20/6 next year with two devasting pick n roll partners in Embid and Simmons. Meanwhile, Jackson struggles to get playing time.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
ROballer
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,738
- And1: 2,981
- Joined: Sep 06, 2009
- Location: Romania
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
If we trade Russell for another **** rookie, who might take 2-3 yrs to get in a groove( and there's a very good chance he doesn't get to Russell's level at that point), I'm **** done with this team.
There's actually a light at the end of the tunnel, and what do we do? Let's end this **** and make a move that takes us 2 years back, just for the **** of it.
There's actually a light at the end of the tunnel, and what do we do? Let's end this **** and make a move that takes us 2 years back, just for the **** of it.
Steve Nash injures his back while carrying bags
Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
Slava
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 61,136
- And1: 33,835
- Joined: Oct 15, 2006
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
You need skill to survive in the league today, I value D'Lo's skill set far more than Jackson's athleticism or intensity.
+
= Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
Michael Lucky
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,160
- And1: 6,803
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
Not to mention you are then taking a step back in the rebuilding process for at least two years when your goal is to start attracting FAs in 2018. Good luck when two of your young players all play the same position as those you are targeting.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
-
Pythagoras
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,624
- And1: 3,316
- Joined: Aug 15, 2012
- Location: KC, Mo
-
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Thread: Lakeshow edition
ozymandias818 wrote:Pythagoras wrote:ozymandias818 wrote:And Ball plays the same position as Russell. What's your point?
The difference is that playing them together wouldn't be a waste, like it would putting a passer of Russell's caliber at a different position so you can play two guys that don't play defense. Jackson was a college freshman. He's fully capable of developing a reliable jumper. You can play Jackson and a bulked Ingram next to each other at the forward spots with ease 3 years from now and have them both dominate on both ends of the floor.
I'd rather the Lakers draft Ball or trade the pick for the right price, but your reasoning doesn't make any sense.
Jackson's jumper issues are every bit as real as Ball and D'Lo's defensive concerns.
No. D'lo will never be a good defender. There are plenty of players that came out of college with 0 jumper and developed a very good one.
This feels like you just hand waving away a very serious flaw of JJ's. Who are these players that became "very good" shooters? Way more often than not, if a guy can't shoot in college, the best you can hope for is them becoming a passable shooter in the NBA.
And defensively, you can scheme around a guard who isn't a good defender (see Steph).
Numbers rule the universe.






