ImageImageImage

Mavericks 2017 Draft #9

Moderators: Dirk, HMFFL, Mavrelous

agentofatlas
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,634
And1: 1,026
Joined: May 23, 2011

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#901 » by agentofatlas » Sat Jun 17, 2017 5:57 am

Teffer10 wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
Mr B wrote:The more I listen to the breakdown on all of the prospects I'm really starting to come around on Monk. His game really does fit the Mavs. He's also as explosive as DSJ. His body isn't as NBA ready as DSJ but the skill set is similar. Also doesn't have the injury history that DSJ does. Now if they draft Monk they will definitely have to trade Curry. With Curry's contract situation they may have to trade Curry either way. Most will say that Monk could never play PG but is that really the case? I mean that team also had Fox so Monk never had to play the point but that doesn't mean he can't do it. Worst case scenario he'd be a very explosive SG (although slightly undersized).



If you draft Monk you hope he's Jason Terry 2.0. And if he is then the Mavs should be elated at the return for their pick. He's a scoring combo guard and that's more than fine.

For some reason I think of JR Smith watching Monk.
Is that a fair comparison?


I think it's fair. If he becomes JR Smith then that's a good player to have.

Also you never know with these Kentucky guys. I think Monk has more playmaking potential than JR.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,009
And1: 5,312
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#902 » by Mr B » Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:22 pm

agentofatlas wrote:
Teffer10 wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:

If you draft Monk you hope he's Jason Terry 2.0. And if he is then the Mavs should be elated at the return for their pick. He's a scoring combo guard and that's more than fine.

For some reason I think of JR Smith watching Monk.
Is that a fair comparison?


I think it's fair. If he becomes JR Smith then that's a good player to have.

Also you never know with these Kentucky guys. I think Monk has more playmaking potential than JR.


Yea he's definitely more of a playmaker than JR Smith. I have heard that comparison before though. I've also heard him compared to Jamal Crawford, although Crawford is 2 inches taller.
Devassa
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,605
And1: 1,361
Joined: Jul 30, 2015
 

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#903 » by Devassa » Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:28 pm

Teffer10 wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
Mr B wrote:The more I listen to the breakdown on all of the prospects I'm really starting to come around on Monk. His game really does fit the Mavs. He's also as explosive as DSJ. His body isn't as NBA ready as DSJ but the skill set is similar. Also doesn't have the injury history that DSJ does. Now if they draft Monk they will definitely have to trade Curry. With Curry's contract situation they may have to trade Curry either way. Most will say that Monk could never play PG but is that really the case? I mean that team also had Fox so Monk never had to play the point but that doesn't mean he can't do it. Worst case scenario he'd be a very explosive SG (although slightly undersized).



If you draft Monk you hope he's Jason Terry 2.0. And if he is then the Mavs should be elated at the return for their pick. He's a scoring combo guard and that's more than fine.

For some reason I think of JR Smith watching Monk.
Is that a fair comparison?


JR Smith with a brain is a very good player if picked 9th overall
2011Champs
General Manager
Posts: 9,036
And1: 854
Joined: Nov 21, 2008
Location: Buried deep in Carlisle's doghouse
 

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#904 » by 2011Champs » Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:53 pm

I have to wonder what veteran the Mavs are drooling over to trade the pick for? They are probably shopping that pick big time.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,009
And1: 5,312
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#905 » by Mr B » Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:00 pm

2011Champs wrote:I have to wonder what veteran the Mavs are drooling over to trade the pick for? They are probably shopping that pick big time.


I don't believe they want to trade the pick at all. If anything they are trying to acquire another pick not get rid of the one they have.
2011Champs
General Manager
Posts: 9,036
And1: 854
Joined: Nov 21, 2008
Location: Buried deep in Carlisle's doghouse
 

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#906 » by 2011Champs » Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:06 pm

Mr B wrote:
2011Champs wrote:I have to wonder what veteran the Mavs are drooling over to trade the pick for? They are probably shopping that pick big time.


I don't believe they want to trade the pick at all. If anything they are trying to acquire another pick not get rid of the one they have.


I'm not so sure about that. They might be putting on that front of acting like they care about the draft but if some team dangles the carrot(aka 30 something all star) I bet the Mavs can't resist and pull the trigger.
Devassa
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,605
And1: 1,361
Joined: Jul 30, 2015
 

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#907 » by Devassa » Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:08 pm

2011Champs wrote:I have to wonder what veteran the Mavs are drooling over to trade the pick for? They are probably shopping that pick big time.


I can't imagine they're shopping it much aside from in packages attempting to move up on the draft. This franchise isn't in a state right now to be looking for veteran pieces.
2011Champs
General Manager
Posts: 9,036
And1: 854
Joined: Nov 21, 2008
Location: Buried deep in Carlisle's doghouse
 

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#908 » by 2011Champs » Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:12 pm

Devassa wrote:
2011Champs wrote:I have to wonder what veteran the Mavs are drooling over to trade the pick for? They are probably shopping that pick big time.


I can't imagine they're shopping it much aside from in packages attempting to move up on the draft. This franchise isn't in a state right now to be looking for veteran pieces.

I agree 100% that the Mavs shouldn't be looking at veterans, I just think that Cuban wouldn't be able to resist a 30 something all star caliber type player. He has always been in love with a big name even if they are past their prime.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,009
And1: 5,312
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#909 » by Mr B » Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:12 pm

2011Champs wrote:
Mr B wrote:
2011Champs wrote:I have to wonder what veteran the Mavs are drooling over to trade the pick for? They are probably shopping that pick big time.


I don't believe they want to trade the pick at all. If anything they are trying to acquire another pick not get rid of the one they have.


I'm not so sure about that. They might be putting on that front of acting like they care about the draft but if some team dangles the carrot(aka 30 something all star) I bet the Mavs can't resist and pull the trigger.


Yea I don't see that happening at all. Just doesn't fit with what they did this year. If that were the case they would be looking to trade a guy like Yogi and DFS and Curry would have never seen the floor. Now with that said if Washington said they wanted the #9 pick for John Wall or if Cleveland wanted #9 for Kyrie Irving then of course they would trade the pick. That ain't happening though.
bobsquad
Rookie
Posts: 1,222
And1: 224
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
   

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#910 » by bobsquad » Sat Jun 17, 2017 5:33 pm

I could see us moving up or down in the lottery. Not trading the pick.
Pinkyring
RealGM
Posts: 10,280
And1: 6,327
Joined: May 28, 2016

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#911 » by Pinkyring » Sat Jun 17, 2017 7:12 pm

We have zero reason to be looking at trading up unless we only move current or wes future picks should be off the table as we already wasted high seconds getting noel
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,009
And1: 5,312
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#912 » by Mr B » Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:14 pm

Pinkyring wrote:We have zero reason to be looking at trading up unless we only move current or wes future picks should be off the table as we already wasted high seconds getting noel


Wasted? You're not a fan of a highly talented young big man?
Pinkyring
RealGM
Posts: 10,280
And1: 6,327
Joined: May 28, 2016

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#913 » by Pinkyring » Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:29 pm

Mr B wrote:
Pinkyring wrote:We have zero reason to be looking at trading up unless we only move current or wes future picks should be off the table as we already wasted high seconds getting noel


Wasted? You're not a fan of a highly talented young big man?

Im not a fan of giving up assets on asset depleted taking then subsequently paying potentially 25m a year to an injury plagued role playing big that hasnt averaged 30mpg in his career
bobsquad
Rookie
Posts: 1,222
And1: 224
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
   

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#914 » by bobsquad » Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:33 pm

Pinkyring wrote:We have zero reason to be looking at trading up unless we only move current or wes future picks should be off the table as we already wasted high seconds getting noel

I'm talking specifically about leapfrogging the Knicks by swapping with MIN, the team in the top 10 most likely to move down.
Pinkyring
RealGM
Posts: 10,280
And1: 6,327
Joined: May 28, 2016

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#915 » by Pinkyring » Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:41 pm

bobsquad wrote:
Pinkyring wrote:We have zero reason to be looking at trading up unless we only move current or wes future picks should be off the table as we already wasted high seconds getting noel

I'm talking specifically about leapfrogging the Knicks by swapping with MIN, the team in the top 10 most likely to move down.

Its still going to cost something minny is just going to give us their pick to be nice and we cant afford to give anything. With a roster full of overpaid role players we need every piece of young cheap talent we can get
Yennefer
Ballboy
Posts: 37
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 15, 2017

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#916 » by Yennefer » Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:01 pm

We are not moving up, stop dreaming Kids.
User avatar
Absinthe
Pro Prospect
Posts: 904
And1: 452
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#917 » by Absinthe » Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:26 am

My dream is for Dennis Smith to fall. I think he's going to be better than Ball or Fultz and the only thing lowering his value is a previous knee injury.

This line up would be potent offensively and one of the better defensive line ups Dallas has had in years:

Smith
Mattthews
Barnes
Dirk
Noel

Noel could be the interior defender. Matthews is the 3 and D guy. Dirk is the floor spacer and a 3 threat. Barnes and Smith play good defense and can create their own shots. The bench would be markedly better too. It's definitely a playoff team barring any major injuries.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,009
And1: 5,312
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#918 » by Mr B » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:30 am

Pinkyring wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Pinkyring wrote:We have zero reason to be looking at trading up unless we only move current or wes future picks should be off the table as we already wasted high seconds getting noel


Wasted? You're not a fan of a highly talented young big man?

Im not a fan of giving up assets on asset depleted taking then subsequently paying potentially 25m a year to an injury plagued role playing big that hasnt averaged 30mpg in his career


Dude 2nd round picks are lucky if they make it in the D-league. Noel has DPOY potential and was a top 5 pick. You realize that Tyson Chandler was injury prone too before the Mavs traded for him right? And at some point you have to pay for talent. Would you rather they sign some scrubass big man just because he cheap? Maybe you'd be happy if they let Noel walk and they just resign Mejri because he's cheap. In the Carlisle's offense the center doesn't need to be Hakeem or Shaq and score 30 a game. In Carlisle's offense they need their big man to be a rim protector and throw down the occasional lob, which is exactly what Noel is. I personally have no problem maxing out Noel. This team needs talent and talent cost money.
Pinkyring
RealGM
Posts: 10,280
And1: 6,327
Joined: May 28, 2016

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#919 » by Pinkyring » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:13 am

Mr B wrote:
Pinkyring wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Wasted? You're not a fan of a highly talented young big man?

Im not a fan of giving up assets on asset depleted taking then subsequently paying potentially 25m a year to an injury plagued role playing big that hasnt averaged 30mpg in his career


Dude 2nd round picks are lucky if they make it in the D-league. Noel has DPOY potential and was a top 5 pick. You realize that Tyson Chandler was injury prone too before the Mavs traded for him right? And at some point you have to pay for talent. Would you rather they sign some scrubass big man just because he cheap? Maybe you'd be happy if they let Noel walk and they just resign Mejri because he's cheap. In the Carlisle's offense the center doesn't need to be Hakeem or Shaq and score 30 a game. In Carlisle's offense they need their big man to be a rim protector and throw down the occasional lob, which is exactly what Noel is. I personally have no problem maxing out Noel. This team needs talent and talent cost money.

Tyson also wasnt on a max contract and had a history of being a productive player is also bigger and more physical than noel, he's really a positionless player too small to be a center and not skilled enough to be a pf. I dont mimd paying for talent but paying spending half the cap on 2 guys that will never be all stars is a recipe for disaster
Darren
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 915
Joined: Nov 06, 2003

Re: Mavericks 2017 Draft #9 

Post#920 » by Darren » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:28 pm

Let's say both Smith and Ntilikina is gone. Do you think it's possible to trade Harris and 9th pick to Minny for Dunn, Dieng and Jones? Both Dunn and Jones are young PG. But Dieng is a proven big. He's solid statelines as starter for Minny. I think he's one of the better value coming back for the 9th pick. Jones is also underrated. He's 9PPG and 7APG per 36 mins. Dunn's a project. He's the same tool and same problem with Ntilikina. His value is as low as a second rounder I think.

Return to Dallas Mavericks