Kerrsed wrote:Ok, so Sixers will be taking Fultz no matter what if the trade goes through, i think there is no denying that.
From there the Lakers either go with Ball and Celtics take Jackson, or Lakers snake Jackson, in which i see the Celtics taking Tatum.
This week im back on the Issac bandwagon. I was gun-ho on Tatum (as gun-ho as someone could be when left with our options), as i think trying to Play Issac as a SF wont work out that great and your taking away from a large part of his game by playing him out of position (Weakside defense). But, with all that being said, im wondering about sliding Chriss over to SF and having Issac back at his natural PF spot. I think that really could work out pretty damn well.
..........but if Jackson or Ball are somehow still on the board, we have to take them.
is Isaac much different in size to Durant? I think he can probably defend small forwards out of college better than Durant could. I just think either Bender or Isaac could play SF at times when Warren sits or PF when Chriss sits and when we play small they could all be out there. If Chriss learns to defend better he could possibly play 3 or 5 at times in the future.
Of course the NBA is trending to positionless basketball after GS plays like that and McD and Walton have talked about it.
