Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:PG13>Gordon Hayward
Yes he his. Paul George is a better player than Gordon Hayward. If the Celtics get Paul George, they should go after a big. Like Blake Griffin.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:PG13>Gordon Hayward
canman1971 wrote:Afam wrote:Paul George would be rental, so the 3rd Pick, Avery Bradley should be enough. Maybe a low first round pick. That should be all the Celtics should offer. Paul George is an expiring contract.
No way you offer the 3rd pick without a extension guarantee. That's just plain dumb.
albas89 wrote:BarFight wrote:
This tweet to me is quite interesting.
It tells me that the news being relayed from the media didn't come from the Celtics, but it also means we laid an offer on the table for them to accept, not the other way around. Ainge was proactive in trading this pick, again shown by the deal being all but done still 5 days from the draft. The moment Danny has secured an extra asset, we hear the Paul George report that slashes his trade value, and makes him unappealing to anybody that can't contend in 2017-18, as it seems he would just jump to the Lakers. There are very few teams that can claim to content in 2017-18, but the Celtics + PG is one of them. The Pacers 99.9% have to trade him after this report, but his market will be CLE, BOS, HOU and SA? BOS by far has the most disposable but attractive assets of that crowd.
I can't help but think Danny was so giddy when he got the 1st pick because he knew he could pull off this plan with the extra asset. I don't think his desire to trade #1 pick is a recent development, I've got to think it was his plan all along.
I feel that Cleveland can offer a better package, as they will be willing to give the best player by far out of the pack (Love).
On the other hand, it might be wise for Indiana to just tank, thus receiving future picks and cheap, long-term contracts (i.e. Crowder) should be more attractive. If that's the case, let's not forget Atlanta was willing to give 4 future first-round picks for George, so that might put them in the mix, too.
DarkAzcura wrote:Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:Afam wrote:Paul George would be rental, so the 3rd Pick, Avery Bradley should be enough. Maybe a low first round pick. That should be all the Celtics should offer. Paul George is an expiring contract.
The 3rd pick is not an option. No lottery pick is an option. Indiana will get peanuts regardless. You don't gift them a get out of jail free card
It's still amazing that Minny was able to pull a #1 pick from Cleveland for an expiring Love who was surely going to leave.
The difference between these situations is that George has officially announced he is leaving. What a way to kill your trade value..
BigTrade92 wrote:A fair offer for PG would be Bradley, Crowder, Memphis 2018 #1 pick for George
Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:PG13>Gordon Hayward
canman1971 wrote:Afam wrote:Paul George would be rental, so the 3rd Pick, Avery Bradley should be enough. Maybe a low first round pick. That should be all the Celtics should offer. Paul George is an expiring contract.
No way you offer the 3rd pick without a extension guarantee. That's just plain dumb.
Celts17Pride wrote:BigTrade92 wrote:A fair offer for PG would be Bradley, Crowder, Memphis 2018 #1 pick for George
What?
George is signing with the Lakers next year. He has made no secret of that.
neno wrote:Historically Ainge drafts guys after 2 workouts. Anyone have 2 workouts?
Right now we just have to move Rozier to clear full max. If we trade Demetrius Jackson, we can get within 100K of a max and maybe Hayward or Griffin are willing to pass up a small amount of $$$ to help the team win/save that asset in Rozier match salary and/or flip for some value. Note: this assumes Zizic comes over but Yabusele stays stashed 1 more year.DarkAzcura wrote:So if we trade for George, do we have the cap space to sign Hayward outright? Is that possible? I'm forgetting all the players we have to renounce to make room for max cap space.
Celtics_Champs wrote:Abby Chin always looks good. She blocked me on Twitter and to this day I have no idea and I never said anything to her. One day I will see her on sidelines and ask her why oh why.
BarFight wrote:albas89 wrote:BarFight wrote:
This tweet to me is quite interesting.
It tells me that the news being relayed from the media didn't come from the Celtics, but it also means we laid an offer on the table for them to accept, not the other way around. Ainge was proactive in trading this pick, again shown by the deal being all but done still 5 days from the draft. The moment Danny has secured an extra asset, we hear the Paul George report that slashes his trade value, and makes him unappealing to anybody that can't contend in 2017-18, as it seems he would just jump to the Lakers. There are very few teams that can claim to content in 2017-18, but the Celtics + PG is one of them. The Pacers 99.9% have to trade him after this report, but his market will be CLE, BOS, HOU and SA? BOS by far has the most disposable but attractive assets of that crowd.
I can't help but think Danny was so giddy when he got the 1st pick because he knew he could pull off this plan with the extra asset. I don't think his desire to trade #1 pick is a recent development, I've got to think it was his plan all along.
I feel that Cleveland can offer a better package, as they will be willing to give the best player by far out of the pack (Love).
On the other hand, it might be wise for Indiana to just tank, thus receiving future picks and cheap, long-term contracts (i.e. Crowder) should be more attractive. If that's the case, let's not forget Atlanta was willing to give 4 future first-round picks for George, so that might put them in the mix, too.
Where does Kevin Love get Indiana? At best it's a wash with PG, meaning they are still going nowhere. They don't make that trade. We are in the unique situation of having both enough cap space for sign a max FA, and have contract filler guys + premium pick/s to make a PG trade work - nobody else can offer that to IND and contention to PG next year.
Between the #3 this year and 18BKN, we have enough picks coming through to give up the LAL/SAC pick, super value to us because trading it could mean returning 2 stars - PG and Hayward/Griffin.
BigTrade92 wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:BigTrade92 wrote:A fair offer for PG would be Bradley, Crowder, Memphis 2018 #1 pick for George
What?
George is signing with the Lakers next year. He has made no secret of that.
Yeah that was may bad, meant Zeller instead of Bradley.
And if you build a super-team here and make the Finals, no I truly don't believe George bolts.
Celts17Pride wrote:BigTrade92 wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:What?
George is signing with the Lakers next year. He has made no secret of that.
Yeah that was may bad, meant Zeller instead of Bradley.
And if you build a super-team here and make the Finals, no I truly don't believe George bolts.
I personally wouldn't give up anything for Paul George. He would be leaving in 1 year.