ImageImageImage

Draft Discussion Part 3

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Who would you rather have, Jackson or Tatum?

Jackson
44
80%
Tatum
11
20%
 
Total votes: 55

User avatar
Dambo
Senior
Posts: 582
And1: 253
Joined: Apr 07, 2012

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1881 » by Dambo » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:41 am

Booker is not going anywhere. He is the face of the franchise for the upcoming years. Those who are including him in trade talks are being ridicules.

And bender isn't going anywhere also.
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1882 » by JMac1 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:41 am

I'd believe Isaac over Tatum.....but not Jackson. Carry on
Mulhollanddrive
RealGM
Posts: 12,555
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1883 » by Mulhollanddrive » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:41 am

I so much prefer Bell to Brooks given our roster balance, but what do I know.
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1884 » by JMac1 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:42 am

Dambo wrote:Booker is not going anywhere. He is the face of the franchise for the upcoming years. Those who are including him in trade talks are being ridicules.


This is Booker's team. The next guy we draft is going to be Book's running mate. I don't think Isaac fits that bill, however, Ball, Jackson, and Tatum does.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1885 » by BobbieL » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:45 am

1UPZ wrote:Only way I can see Cavs, Suns and Pacers make a deal is if..

Pacers
In: Heat 2018 pick, Knight, Warren
Out: George

Suns
In: Love
Out: Heat 2018 pick, Knight, Warren

Cavs
In: George
Out: Love


This is something along the lines of what I see. In fact, I will give them the possible Phoenix Pick if its top 10 protected else Miami pick. Also, Derrick Jones Jr. would be included.

The Pacres have zero leverage - you are telling me the Suns can get Love for Warren, Knight, a 2018 first and Jones, I pretty much do that deal.
Derento
Junior
Posts: 341
And1: 114
Joined: Feb 07, 2017
 

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1886 » by Derento » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:46 am

sunsbum wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Mjeezy2006 wrote:I am not a fan of Isaac

1. Not explosive by any means
2. Inconstant shooter
3. Sub par strength and needs to gain weight
4. Average defensively

I will be pissed if this tank job of a season lands him at #4


He's pretty explosive for his size, length.. definitely more explosive than say, Tatum. He was very inconsistent, but that goes for most of these guys. He's definitely not an avg defender though. Even his DX video says he can guard 1-4. He's a little bit like WCS with a shot, more explosiveness and way more upside.


He has zero offensive moves. Doesn't it worry you that his baskets were all assisted but like 10% or something like that? That's terrible. Also asthma is a concern for me as well.


That's not true at all.
90% assisted rate is impossible.
Deandre Jordan and Clint Cappella are 70%,76% for their careers.

https://hoop-math.com/FloridaSt.2017.php
Isaac was assisted on 83.9% of his threes.
36% on MR jumpers
48.6% at the rim.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,141
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1887 » by bwgood77 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:48 am

kennydorglas wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:
Read on Twitter


positionless basketball
might be a hint we're really going after isaac. :D :D :D


Would you be upset if we end up with Isaac? I imagine that answer is different if JJ is still on the board vs not on board. I can't remember your big board.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1888 » by BobbieL » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:48 am

ray ray wrote:
1UPZ wrote:
Villalobos wrote:
Read on Twitter


brb barfing



**** off Bill Simmons



No way the Suns trade Chriss.. the Suns value him and want to see him grow with Booker.


Stupid idea by Simmons. He thinks the Pacers have leverage. They do not. I can possibly only see Bledsoe traded if they think Knight will revert to some form without Bledsoe around. But not Chriss or Bender. I can see Bledsoe, Warren and the lesser of Miami and Phoenix. Just have to hope Knight without Bledsoe is a helluva lot better. He is younger
Blonde
Veteran
Posts: 2,934
And1: 3,919
Joined: Jun 16, 2014
Location: Phoenix
       

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1889 » by Blonde » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:49 am

For Isaac fans, what do you see as his ultimate upside? Do you project him to be a player capable of making several allstar appearances, or more of the ultimate role player type?
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,175
And1: 6,907
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1890 » by DirtyDez » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:50 am

dremill24 wrote:
Spoiler:
DirtyDez wrote:Isaac is slim but he could be a monster physically with his length. Fast forward down the road a few years...

Image

Image


I've never seen anything to indicate Isaac has this kind of skill level with the ball. I'd be super excited if he did, but alas


Jesus ppl I'm talking about them physically and how his body could develop.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
User avatar
Christine-In-AZ
Starter
Posts: 2,423
And1: 1,539
Joined: Nov 27, 2007

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1891 » by Christine-In-AZ » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:52 am

ray ray wrote:All I'm saying is this... the Suns don't have to help anyone but if they do.. they're going to be the beneficiaries from ANY trade


solid managerial goal
User avatar
kennydorglas
Suns Forum Statistical Savant
Posts: 8,898
And1: 6,127
Joined: Jul 31, 2012
Location: Bauru SP
Contact:
       

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1892 » by kennydorglas » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:56 am

bwgood77 wrote:
kennydorglas wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:
Read on Twitter


positionless basketball
might be a hint we're really going after isaac. :D :D :D


Would you be upset if we end up with Isaac? I imagine that answer is different if JJ is still on the board vs not on board. I can't remember your big board.


I have JJ at 2 and Isaac at 3, just because I had a crush on JJ in the all-american game (actually destroying tatum and dishing unbelievable passes all game long)
"I got nothing to prove in this league. I’m a max player, and I’ll continue to be a max player."
Five foot Eighton

“No matter what you do or how you do it, as long as you have true passion you will succeed.”
Luis “WEEZY” Egurrola
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,229
And1: 24,587
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1893 » by lilfishi22 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:59 am

1UPZ wrote:
Mjeezy2006 wrote:I am not a fan of Isaac

1. Not explosive by any means
2. Inconstant shooter
3. Sub par strength and needs to gain weight
4. Average defensively

I will be pissed if this tank job of a season lands him at #4



For a 6'10-6'11 guy with a finesse game... he's explosive enough.
Shooting can improve...
Weight gain comes with maturation
He's good defensively... can cover small players to bigs.... but too weak to guard bangers.

This is another issue I have with Isaac. This is virtually the same description of Bender with a little more explosiveness and a touch shorter. I just don't see why we need another 3/4 big when we're still trying to figure out Bender. I've always maintained the mindset that players outside of Booker can be considered moving pieces so if a guy comes in to play the same position, they must either have more potential or they are a better fit long term for us. With Chris and Bender manning that 3?/4/5 position and Warren/DJJ at the 3, I have a hard time seeing enough development time for Isaac.

This is all after looking at his play. I think his shooting is still suspect, guard skills (handles, passing) are shakey and far from an asset at this point and defensively, he has the tools to be a monster but the question is not when but if he puts it altogether. If we're rolling the dice, I'd rather have JJ or Tatum.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,141
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1894 » by bwgood77 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:02 am

Derento wrote:
sunsbum wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
He's pretty explosive for his size, length.. definitely more explosive than say, Tatum. He was very inconsistent, but that goes for most of these guys. He's definitely not an avg defender though. Even his DX video says he can guard 1-4. He's a little bit like WCS with a shot, more explosiveness and way more upside.


He has zero offensive moves. Doesn't it worry you that his baskets were all assisted but like 10% or something like that? That's terrible. Also asthma is a concern for me as well.


That's not true at all.
90% assisted rate is impossible.
Deandre Jordan and Clint Cappella are 70%,76% for their careers.

https://hoop-math.com/FloridaSt.2017.php
Isaac was assisted on 83.9% of his threes.
36% on MR jumpers
48.6% at the rim.


Thanks for keeping it real. I've watched enough of him to know something was off with that comment.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,141
And1: 61,000
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1895 » by bwgood77 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:05 am

JMac1 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
DirtyDez wrote:


Fox's very mediocre vision scares me more than his jumper. He's not a good passer at all vs good defenses.

Yeah, I'm not a fan of point guards who can't shoot or pass.


I'm not a fan of anyone who can't shoot...shooting IS basketball, otherwise its soccer.

I get it with your PG who can't shoot philosophy, but Jackson not being able to shoot means he is one dimensional right now with the hopes of being a two-way player as well. With this logic, isn't Monk and Tatum better prospects? Both can shoot and have the tools to play defense.

If Jackson and Fox never learn to shoot......then they are a wasted picks at number 4. Getting Monk to defend PG and Tatum to focus on D a little more is easier than getting non-shooters to shot better. IMO, of course.


I agree about shooting, but I think Jackson makes up for that with the rest of his game. I'd definitely take him over Monk and Tatum.
User avatar
Christine-In-AZ
Starter
Posts: 2,423
And1: 1,539
Joined: Nov 27, 2007

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1896 » by Christine-In-AZ » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:13 am

Waylay13 wrote:
1UPZ wrote:Only way I can see Cavs, Suns and Pacers make a deal is if..

Pacers
In: Heat 2018 pick, Knight, Warren
Out: George

Suns
In: Love
Out: Heat 2018 pick, Knight, Warren

Cavs
In: George
Out: Love


The question is why would we want Love? Our target isnt into to be in the playoffs this year or the one after that so why would we mess up our development time with Chriss and Bender to bring Love in?


I doubt Pacers would even think about a Warren/Knight package without Suns #4. Warren is a RFA next year and Knight...well? 14.5 million x 3 seasons says plenty.

Why PHX might tilt towards Love in such a deal might have a lot to do with Warren & Knight's contract situations.
User avatar
sunsbum
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,539
And1: 5,396
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Portland
     

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1897 » by sunsbum » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:21 am

DirtyDez wrote:Isaac is slim but he could be a monster physically with his length. Fast forward down the road a few years...

Image

Image


No way. Odom was an Elite rebounder and play maker. At least this is better than the KG, Giannis crap I've been seeing.
"Mannnnn I’m like the guy that pissed this whole board off saying literally all year no Mikal, no Mikal in the KD trade."
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1898 » by rsavaj » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:21 am

Mjeezy2006 wrote:I am not a fan of Isaac

1. Not explosive by any means
2. Inconstant shooter
3. Sub par strength and needs to gain weight
4. Average defensively

I will be pissed if this tank job of a season lands him at #4


the scouting reports I've read call him one of the best(if not THE best) defenders in the draft. that's his whole appeal.

McD has to ask himself whether he values a guy who peaks at 75% of prime Melo(Tatum's ceiling IMO) or 75% of Draymond(Isaac's ceiling IMO)
User avatar
sunsbum
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,539
And1: 5,396
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Portland
     

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1899 » by sunsbum » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:23 am

bwgood77 wrote:
Derento wrote:
sunsbum wrote:
He has zero offensive moves. Doesn't it worry you that his baskets were all assisted but like 10% or something like that? That's terrible. Also asthma is a concern for me as well.


That's not true at all.
90% assisted rate is impossible.
Deandre Jordan and Clint Cappella are 70%,76% for their careers.

https://hoop-math.com/FloridaSt.2017.php
Isaac was assisted on 83.9% of his threes.
36% on MR jumpers
48.6% at the rim.


Thanks for keeping it real. I've watched enough of him to know something was off with that comment.


Ah, ok.. either I miss quoted but I'm pretty sure darealjuice post that number somewhere a few weeks ago. I'd find it but I'm lazy so ill just take the blame for that one.
"Mannnnn I’m like the guy that pissed this whole board off saying literally all year no Mikal, no Mikal in the KD trade."
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Draft Discussion Part 3 

Post#1900 » by BobbieL » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:25 am

ChrisInAZ wrote:
ray ray wrote:All I'm saying is this... the Suns don't have to help anyone but if they do.. they're going to be the beneficiaries from ANY trade


solid managerial goal


If its Love for George - not sure another team is needed. Now, if the Pacers want to go younger and kind of rebuild, the Suns can help

To me, if I am the Cavs, I have no problem going for it one more year. Kyrie, George, LeBron, Tristan - that's pretty damn solid. Bogut probably re-ups for cheap. PJ Tucker maybe.

Return to Phoenix Suns