Chino Athens wrote:jayjaysee wrote:For the oP.. I can't figure out how Portland gets what they get in this deal. I feel like it would be a really (really) good trade for them, without Leonard. IMO they have no business in this as it just helps LAL break Deng in half.. When Deng isn't needed. Keep Dudley, send NY 32 and a future 2nd.
Sorry,i cant understand exactly what youre saying.Portland gets out of Leonard's contract,but has to give two late first picks.Salary cap reasons I guess.They can pick with 15 whoever they really need.Bender is an interesting payback for Leonard and the picks get you Ullis and balance even more the deal. They get rid out of Leonard and help the Lakers out of Deng,but the Lakers still got money to pay and trades to do to make this "ground zero".Portland is at "ground zero" already.
The rest I dont get. "When Deng isn't needed. Keep Dudley, send NY 32 and a future 2nd."
Okay.. Most everyone agrees with me, so I don't feel much a need to foot in the ground but I will explain.
Leonard costs one of the firsts to dump. Bender is worth more than the other first. So. It's awful for Phoenix.
Deng inclusion.. Why? Why not keep Dudley? They'd play the exact same role really.. The same minutes with the same lineups. But one is cheaper. A lot*
Why is Phoenix doing LA a favor? Why is Portland getting such a great deal when they aren't needed?
I don't understand, but really I don't agree with your valuation of the players probably so there's no fixing the difference of opinions. And it's not even the Melo part I disagree with, i think it's too much for Melo as TJ is an actual good player/prospect.. But that's minor.. The bigger issue is all the fluff you have added thy just hurts Phoenix.
And you said Phoenix can't tank? This season Phoenix is drafting 4th with their "overpaid vets" ... So... They are a Bledsoe trade away from 3? Or 2nd? They can tank just fine if they want.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums