Kobblehead wrote:PLO wrote:^^ I'm not sure a system in which players have to be at college for two years is all that workable. Simmons wAs NBA ready straight out of high school and it was pretty obvious going to college for a year did nothing for him, let alone wasting him for two years there. If a two year stint was mandatory you'd find a lot more players doing a one and done in an international league
The expected proposal is that players can enter the draft straight out of highschool. But those that choose to go to school have to stay for 2 years.
That's one possibility, but that isn't going to improve the problem for colleges or the pro teams. It will just make it better for prospects like Ben Simmons who was ready out of highschool.
The teams and the colleges want it longer than one year, and the players don't, but the players want other things that the other two don't want so it will be a negotiation.
The problem with allowing the Lebrons of the world to go straight to the NBA is that a whole lot of kids lose because they think that they have a shot, and end up blowing their chance. There are a heck of a lot more Korleone Youngs, than there are Lebrons.
How many of this year's top ten would have gone straight to the NBA if they could, and were forced to stay 2 years in college if they didn't?
The NFL has a rule that you have to be 3 years out of highschool to be eligible for the draft. I think that 2 years for the NBA is extremely reasonable.
Baseball and Hockey are different because they have extensive minor league options for the players who don't go straight to the top:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk












