CrowderKeg wrote:
I should've clarified -- rumors that favor the Celtics. Ugh.
Honestly, looking over that dude's Twitter page, what he's saying is exactly what someone who hosts a radio show and wants people to tune in would say.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
CrowderKeg wrote:
I should've clarified -- rumors that favor the Celtics. Ugh.


Slartibartfast wrote:Banks2Pierce wrote:fallguy wrote:
George is very good but he's not a top 10 guy anymore.
I agreed with this in February, but I think he raised his game from March on. Probably top 10-ish.
I think you have to judge a guy by a whole season, not the closing stretch. The Nets made that mistake with D-Will and the KG/Pierce trade.

Banks2Pierce wrote:fallguy wrote:
George is very good but he's not a top 10 guy anymore.
I agreed with this in February, but I think he raised his game from March on. Probably top 10-ish.
If teams are hesitant to offer Griffin the full max, or even a four-year deal, the Celtics could always offer Griffin more years at less than the max. Griffin is a better player than Hayward in virtually every category other than 3-point shooting. He’d solve Boston’s major rebounding issues, while also providing a playmaking presence that Brad Stevens could unlock.
fallguy wrote:ajones9219 wrote:klemen4 wrote:Including Lal pick is to much for Pg imo...its a great deal for indy
Ab can get them one first rounder, also crowder+ our 2 picks...thats 4 pick, one could be top 3 in 2019 as sacramento pick.
We should not include that pick
PG is a top 10 player. I'll be sick if we lose him over a draft pick, particularly a non bkn pick
George is very good but he's not a top 10 guy anymore.
jirrit wrote:fallguy wrote:ajones9219 wrote:
PG is a top 10 player. I'll be sick if we lose him over a draft pick, particularly a non bkn pick
George is very good but he's not a top 10 guy anymore.
Regular season George and play-offs George. Eventhough it was a 4-0 the team who could keep it the closest with the Cavs were the Pacers.
fallguy wrote:ajones9219 wrote:klemen4 wrote:Including Lal pick is to much for Pg imo...its a great deal for indy
Ab can get them one first rounder, also crowder+ our 2 picks...thats 4 pick, one could be top 3 in 2019 as sacramento pick.
We should not include that pick
PG is a top 10 player. I'll be sick if we lose him over a draft pick, particularly a non bkn pick
George is very good but he's not a top 10 guy anymore.
CrowderKeg wrote:jirrit wrote:fallguy wrote:
George is very good but he's not a top 10 guy anymore.
Regular season George and play-offs George. Eventhough it was a 4-0 the team who could keep it the closest with the Cavs were the Pacers.
It's simple enough for me. Name me a list of forwards who can go toe-to-toe with KD/Lebron/Kawhi on offense while playing them well on defense. George is on top of that list, if there's even a list.

165bows wrote:Banks2Pierce wrote:fallguy wrote:
George is very good but he's not a top 10 guy anymore.
I agreed with this in February, but I think he raised his game from March on. Probably top 10-ish.
Body of work. I would have said he was top-5 or 6 before this season, based on his skill set I'm not really changing on this one 'poor' season.

3D Chess wrote:https://theringer.com/nba-free-agency-blake-griffin-paul-george-spurs-83e7a97d1cf0If teams are hesitant to offer Griffin the full max, or even a four-year deal, the Celtics could always offer Griffin more years at less than the max. Griffin is a better player than Hayward in virtually every category other than 3-point shooting. He’d solve Boston’s major rebounding issues, while also providing a playmaking presence that Brad Stevens could unlock.
Murmurs around the league that Plan B Blake Griffin could potentially be had for less than the max. Delightful.

CrowderKeg wrote:Speaking of lists... someone on here really wants this thing to happen. We're only 2/3 into the thread limit. It's beyond embarrassing lol. Someone put that guy on suicide watch once it's announced he's going to the Cavs or Lakers.
CrowderKeg wrote:Speaking of lists... someone on here really wants this thing to happen. We're only 2/3 into the thread limit. It's beyond embarrassing lol. Someone put that guy on suicide watch once it's announced he's going to the Cavs or Lakers.
DarkAzcura wrote:CrowderKeg wrote:Speaking of lists... someone on here really wants this thing to happen. We're only 2/3 into the thread limit. It's beyond embarrassing lol. Someone put that guy on suicide watch once it's announced he's going to the Cavs or Lakers.
17 posts got me on here? Lame.
This is a first for me, lol.
The Pacers would be wise to target a package that resembles what the Warriors might have offered the Wolves back in 2014: a mixture of players entering their primes and future picks. The problem is finding a team capable and willing to do it. Fortunately for the Pacers, two of the handful of teams reportedly interested in George could meet those criteria.
The Clippers could dangle DeAndre Jordan, but they don’t have much else. The Cavaliers would have to flip Love for assets, unless the Pacers are fine with running on the playoff treadmill of mediocrity. The Wizards don’t have much to offer other than a sign-and-trade involving Otto Porter. However, both the Rockets and Celtics can put together a mixed bag of assets, greater than any other team rumored to be chasing George. Houston has tradable veterans like Ryan Anderson and Eric Gordon, and younger talents like Patrick Beverley and Clint Capela. Similarly, the Celtics have Avery Bradley, Jae Crowder, Marcus Smart, and a long list of future draft picks they can put on the table.
fallguy wrote:ajones9219 wrote:klemen4 wrote:Including Lal pick is to much for Pg imo...its a great deal for indy
Ab can get them one first rounder, also crowder+ our 2 picks...thats 4 pick, one could be top 3 in 2019 as sacramento pick.
We should not include that pick
PG is a top 10 player. I'll be sick if we lose him over a draft pick, particularly a non bkn pick
George is very good but he's not a top 10 guy anymore.
Captain_Caveman wrote:CrowderKeg wrote:Speaking of lists... someone on here really wants this thing to happen. We're only 2/3 into the thread limit. It's beyond embarrassing lol. Someone put that guy on suicide watch once it's announced he's going to the Cavs or Lakers.Spoiler:
Wonder if anyone has ever cracked 200 before?
That would be pretty impressive on a high-traffic board lol.

CrowderKeg wrote:Speaking of lists... someone on here really wants this thing to happen. We're only 2/3 into the thread limit. It's beyond embarrassing lol. Someone put that guy on suicide watch once it's announced he's going to the Cavs or Lakers.