ImageImageImageImageImage

Same old Clippers

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

wassuphomeboy
Junior
Posts: 457
And1: 236
Joined: Dec 08, 2012
   

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#41 » by wassuphomeboy » Sat Jul 1, 2017 1:22 am

Like it or not, trading a valued superstar for pennies on the dollar is very much a "same old Clippers" move. Anything else is just empty talk and hope and really needs to be seen to be believed at this point.
I root for players always, organizations sometimes.

I don't know how I'm ever going to forgive the Clippers' new front office.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#42 » by nickhx2 » Sat Jul 1, 2017 1:42 am

what part about "he was going to leave anyway" do you not understand
wassuphomeboy
Junior
Posts: 457
And1: 236
Joined: Dec 08, 2012
   

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#43 » by wassuphomeboy » Sat Jul 1, 2017 1:46 am

He wasn't going to leave anyway. It's something you guys talked yourselves into after he left. Like any superstar would willingly leave a max contract in one of the NBA's most desirable destinations on the table unless something really went wrong. And we need to find out what exactly went wrong so this kind of thing doesn't happen again in the future.
I root for players always, organizations sometimes.

I don't know how I'm ever going to forgive the Clippers' new front office.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#44 » by nickhx2 » Sat Jul 1, 2017 1:58 am

he informed the team he was going to leave so they could get assets back and not be left with nothing... why don't you read the reports coming out of it all? otherwise he was opting out and leaving. you seriously can't comprehend that chris paul was tired of being here and that he really wanted to play with harden? desirable means nothing when you have eyes on someone else.

you just don't want to believe it and instead would rather believe ballmer is a trashbag do-nothing owner on the level of dts, for god knows what reason. that's cool but just know that you are lying to yourself. my only hope is that nobody else reading your posts believes the insanity that you do.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,094
And1: 4,831
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#45 » by esqtvd » Sat Jul 1, 2017 3:18 am

I'm a huge CP3 fan
my fav Clip of all time

but he did not do this for us
HOU would have had to gut the roster of the team he's joining if he went as a UFA

plus his Bird rights and ultramax were not sign & tradable
he re-signs next year for that

plus at Texas tax rates [zero!], which should be worth at least $30M over the life of the contract


I think I'm right on all this $$ery
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
TucsonClip
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,535
And1: 950
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
Contact:
 

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#46 » by TucsonClip » Sat Jul 1, 2017 4:57 am

Dont overlook the fact that this is a test year for the Rockets. CP3 can join up with LeBron next summer quite easily. I dont think its anywhere near a lock he re-ups on a full max in Houston. However, next season is the final chance he'll have a signing a 5 year deal (over 38 rule).
Plus, why would I want to go to the NBA? Duke players suck in the pros.

- Shane Battier
Angel strike1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,863
And1: 658
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
       

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#47 » by Angel strike1 » Sat Jul 1, 2017 5:40 am

not really same old clippers. we bring blake back and that was the younger player.

look i am sad about this but as much as i love cp3 . no way a player at that age should be getting 5 year contract....
also dont even think houston works with him there
wassuphomeboy
Junior
Posts: 457
And1: 236
Joined: Dec 08, 2012
   

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#48 » by wassuphomeboy » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:34 am

nickhx2 wrote:he informed the team he was going to leave so they could get assets back and not be left with nothing... why don't you read the reports coming out of it all? otherwise he was opting out and leaving. you seriously can't comprehend that chris paul was tired of being here and that he really wanted to play with harden? desirable means nothing when you have eyes on someone else.

you just don't want to believe it and instead would rather believe ballmer is a trashbag do-nothing owner on the level of dts, for god knows what reason. that's cool but just know that you are lying to yourself. my only hope is that nobody else reading your posts believes the insanity that you do.


I am talking about CP3's entire tenure with the team. The organization failed to surround him with a championship level roster, hence the reason he ended up leaving. Superstars are valuable and they win titles. The sooner we realize this, the better off we'll be. I'm not sure fans of this team realize how valuable a true superstar is, considering how few of them have been around throughout our history.

If CP3 was deadset on going to Houston, why did most reports have him looking at the Spurs and the Rockets' link only come out a day ahead of time? Most expected him to re-sign if anything. At worst, he gave careful consideration to all 3 teams, but it was far from a certainty he was leaving, and if there was even a chance he was staying, the organization should have done everything within reason to keep him.

I never said Ballmer was a terrible owner, just very unproven and a bit overrated so far. Which is true, but not close to the same thing.

He's obviously been an upgrade over our former owner.

But, just because he's better than He-who-should-not-be-named doesn't mean we have to lower our standards to that level. It's a very low bar to cross, and there is a HUGE difference between "better than the guy on the tape" and a championship-level organization.

Having low standards enables complacency and mediocrity, two things this organization can LEAST afford at this period in time.

Just my two cents.
I root for players always, organizations sometimes.

I don't know how I'm ever going to forgive the Clippers' new front office.
wassuphomeboy
Junior
Posts: 457
And1: 236
Joined: Dec 08, 2012
   

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#49 » by wassuphomeboy » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:42 am

TucsonClip wrote:Dont overlook the fact that this is a test year for the Rockets. CP3 can join up with LeBron next summer quite easily. I dont think its anywhere near a lock he re-ups on a full max in Houston. However, next season is the final chance he'll have a signing a 5 year deal (over 38 rule).


Do we have the cap space to bring CP3/LeBron/rest of the Brotherhood back in 2018? I honestly think this is the best chance to contend in both the short and long-term future and should be the #1 priority of the organization.
I root for players always, organizations sometimes.

I don't know how I'm ever going to forgive the Clippers' new front office.
User avatar
Neddy
RealGM
Posts: 15,865
And1: 3,908
Joined: Jan 28, 2012
     

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#50 » by Neddy » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:05 pm

wassuphomeboy wrote:
nickhx2 wrote:he informed the team he was going to leave so they could get assets back and not be left with nothing... why don't you read the reports coming out of it all? otherwise he was opting out and leaving. you seriously can't comprehend that chris paul was tired of being here and that he really wanted to play with harden? desirable means nothing when you have eyes on someone else.

you just don't want to believe it and instead would rather believe ballmer is a trashbag do-nothing owner on the level of dts, for god knows what reason. that's cool but just know that you are lying to yourself. my only hope is that nobody else reading your posts believes the insanity that you do.


I am talking about CP3's entire tenure with the team. The organization failed to surround him with a championship level roster, hence the reason he ended up leaving. Superstars are valuable and they win titles. The sooner we realize this, the better off we'll be. I'm not sure fans of this team realize how valuable a true superstar is, considering how few of them have been around throughout our history.

If CP3 was deadset on going to Houston, why did most reports have him looking at the Spurs and the Rockets' link only come out a day ahead of time? Most expected him to re-sign if anything. At worst, he gave careful consideration to all 3 teams, but it was far from a certainty he was leaving, and if there was even a chance he was staying, the organization should have done everything within reason to keep him.

I never said Ballmer was a terrible owner, just very unproven and a bit overrated so far. Which is true, but not close to the same thing.

He's obviously been an upgrade over our former owner.

But, just because he's better than He-who-should-not-be-named doesn't mean we have to lower our standards to that level. It's a very low bar to cross, and there is a HUGE difference between "better than the guy on the tape" and a championship-level organization.

Having low standards enables complacency and mediocrity, two things this organization can LEAST afford at this period in time.

Just my two cents.


son, don't tell me about how many stars or whom have come through this franchise, and try to lecture any of us the "fans of this team" about it.
ehhhhh f it.
wassuphomeboy
Junior
Posts: 457
And1: 236
Joined: Dec 08, 2012
   

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#51 » by wassuphomeboy » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:22 pm

Neddy wrote:
wassuphomeboy wrote:
nickhx2 wrote:he informed the team he was going to leave so they could get assets back and not be left with nothing... why don't you read the reports coming out of it all? otherwise he was opting out and leaving. you seriously can't comprehend that chris paul was tired of being here and that he really wanted to play with harden? desirable means nothing when you have eyes on someone else.

you just don't want to believe it and instead would rather believe ballmer is a trashbag do-nothing owner on the level of dts, for god knows what reason. that's cool but just know that you are lying to yourself. my only hope is that nobody else reading your posts believes the insanity that you do.


I am talking about CP3's entire tenure with the team. The organization failed to surround him with a championship level roster, hence the reason he ended up leaving. Superstars are valuable and they win titles. The sooner we realize this, the better off we'll be. I'm not sure fans of this team realize how valuable a true superstar is, considering how few of them have been around throughout our history.

If CP3 was deadset on going to Houston, why did most reports have him looking at the Spurs and the Rockets' link only come out a day ahead of time? Most expected him to re-sign if anything. At worst, he gave careful consideration to all 3 teams, but it was far from a certainty he was leaving, and if there was even a chance he was staying, the organization should have done everything within reason to keep him.

I never said Ballmer was a terrible owner, just very unproven and a bit overrated so far. Which is true, but not close to the same thing.

He's obviously been an upgrade over our former owner.

But, just because he's better than He-who-should-not-be-named doesn't mean we have to lower our standards to that level. It's a very low bar to cross, and there is a HUGE difference between "better than the guy on the tape" and a championship-level organization.

Having low standards enables complacency and mediocrity, two things this organization can LEAST afford at this period in time.

Just my two cents.


son, don't tell me about how many stars or whom have come through this franchise, and try to lecture any of us the "fans of this team" about it.


Don't "son" me. I have a right to expect the best from this team, as any fan should. I've been a fan through plenty of seasons of fruitless hope and am certainly not willing to sit through more indefinite losing/non-contending seasons just for some misguided "nostalgia" about the past. It really isn't a badge of honor or anything like that. If anything, it's the exact mentality that needs to be changed to bring this team back to the top where it belongs.
I root for players always, organizations sometimes.

I don't know how I'm ever going to forgive the Clippers' new front office.
User avatar
Neddy
RealGM
Posts: 15,865
And1: 3,908
Joined: Jan 28, 2012
     

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#52 » by Neddy » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:27 pm

wassuphomeboy wrote:
Neddy wrote:
wassuphomeboy wrote:
I am talking about CP3's entire tenure with the team. The organization failed to surround him with a championship level roster, hence the reason he ended up leaving. Superstars are valuable and they win titles. The sooner we realize this, the better off we'll be. I'm not sure fans of this team realize how valuable a true superstar is, considering how few of them have been around throughout our history.

If CP3 was deadset on going to Houston, why did most reports have him looking at the Spurs and the Rockets' link only come out a day ahead of time? Most expected him to re-sign if anything. At worst, he gave careful consideration to all 3 teams, but it was far from a certainty he was leaving, and if there was even a chance he was staying, the organization should have done everything within reason to keep him.

I never said Ballmer was a terrible owner, just very unproven and a bit overrated so far. Which is true, but not close to the same thing.

He's obviously been an upgrade over our former owner.

But, just because he's better than He-who-should-not-be-named doesn't mean we have to lower our standards to that level. It's a very low bar to cross, and there is a HUGE difference between "better than the guy on the tape" and a championship-level organization.

Having low standards enables complacency and mediocrity, two things this organization can LEAST afford at this period in time.

Just my two cents.


son, don't tell me about how many stars or whom have come through this franchise, and try to lecture any of us the "fans of this team" about it.


Don't "son" me. I have a right to expect the best from this team, as any fan should. I've been a fan through plenty of seasons of fruitless hope and am certainly not willing to sit through more losing seasons just for some misguided "nostalgia" about the past. It really isn't a badge of honor or anything like that. That's the exact mentality that needs to change to bring this team back to the top where it belongs.


you don' like to be called a son, but you keep acting like a child. don't have patience? go follow the Warriors like so many who were laker fans back in the 80, turned into the Bulls fans in the 90s.

when you get old and have seen sports for 4 decades like me or DonTommy, you learn that everything in life has a rise and fall. even the most mighty names. so SON, stop whining.
ehhhhh f it.
wassuphomeboy
Junior
Posts: 457
And1: 236
Joined: Dec 08, 2012
   

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#53 » by wassuphomeboy » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:34 pm

Neddy wrote:
wassuphomeboy wrote:
Neddy wrote:
son, don't tell me about how many stars or whom have come through this franchise, and try to lecture any of us the "fans of this team" about it.


Don't "son" me. I have a right to expect the best from this team, as any fan should. I've been a fan through plenty of seasons of fruitless hope and am certainly not willing to sit through more losing seasons just for some misguided "nostalgia" about the past. It really isn't a badge of honor or anything like that. That's the exact mentality that needs to change to bring this team back to the top where it belongs.


you don' like to be called a son, but you keep acting like a child. don't have patience? go follow the Warriors like so many who were laker fans back in the 80, turned into the Bulls fans in the 90s.

when you get old and have seen sports for 4 decades like me or DonTommy, you learn that everything in life has a rise and fall. even the most mighty names. so SON, stop whining.


Didn't realize we weren't allowed to want the best for this team now. If I didn't have patience, I'd have hopped the bandwagon a longggg time ago. But I haven't.

Would be nice to see an actual "rise" in this team soon, or maybe you just have low standards. But don't drag me down with you.

And no, I detest the Warriors and everything they stand for, which is why I want this team to reach a level where they can surpass the Warriors, but thanks for asking.
I root for players always, organizations sometimes.

I don't know how I'm ever going to forgive the Clippers' new front office.
User avatar
TucsonClip
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,535
And1: 950
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
Contact:
 

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#54 » by TucsonClip » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:23 pm

wassuphomeboy wrote:
TucsonClip wrote:Dont overlook the fact that this is a test year for the Rockets. CP3 can join up with LeBron next summer quite easily. I dont think its anywhere near a lock he re-ups on a full max in Houston. However, next season is the final chance he'll have a signing a 5 year deal (over 38 rule).


Do we have the cap space to bring CP3/LeBron/rest of the Brotherhood back in 2018? I honestly think this is the best chance to contend in both the short and long-term future and should be the #1 priority of the organization.


We potentially could open $50 mil in cap. Im going off memory but that's a rough estimate.
Plus, why would I want to go to the NBA? Duke players suck in the pros.

- Shane Battier
User avatar
TucsonClip
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,535
And1: 950
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
Contact:
 

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#55 » by TucsonClip » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:29 pm

TucsonClip wrote:Dont overlook the fact that this is a test year for the Rockets. CP3 can join up with LeBron next summer quite easily. I dont think its anywhere near a lock he re-ups on a full max in Houston. However, next season is the final chance he'll have a signing a 5 year deal (over 38 rule).


Going to correct myself here. Paul's birthday is in May and he'll be 33 by the time free agency starts, so he's not eligible for a 5 year deal next season. Haven't dug deep into the bylaws on this, but the Nene contract saga pretty much confirms this.
Plus, why would I want to go to the NBA? Duke players suck in the pros.

- Shane Battier
User avatar
Ranma
RealGM
Posts: 14,456
And1: 4,062
Joined: Jun 13, 2011
Location: OC, CA
Contact:
       

Over 38 Rule 

Post#56 » by Ranma » Sun Jul 2, 2017 9:26 pm

TucsonClip wrote:Going to correct myself here. Paul's birthday is in May and he'll be 33 by the time free agency starts, so he's not eligible for a 5 year deal next season. Haven't dug deep into the bylaws on this, but the Nene contract saga pretty much confirms this.


Read on Twitter
LA Legends: Kershaw & Koufax_ Image _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
User avatar
Quake Griffin
RealGM
Posts: 15,460
And1: 4,676
Joined: Jul 06, 2012
     

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#57 » by Quake Griffin » Sun Jul 2, 2017 9:31 pm

But he can sign a 4 year deal to take him to 37 right?




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
“I’ve always felt that drafting is the life blood of any organization.” - Jerome Alan West.
User avatar
Ranma
RealGM
Posts: 14,456
And1: 4,062
Joined: Jun 13, 2011
Location: OC, CA
Contact:
       

Not Quite a Retirement Contract 

Post#58 » by Ranma » Sun Jul 2, 2017 9:44 pm

Quake Griffin wrote:But he can sign a 4 year deal to take him to 37 right?


I don't know the technicalities or full details but it sounds like it.
LA Legends: Kershaw & Koufax_ Image _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
User avatar
TucsonClip
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,535
And1: 950
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
Contact:
 

Re: Same old Clippers 

Post#59 » by TucsonClip » Sun Jul 2, 2017 10:07 pm

Quake Griffin wrote:But he can sign a 4 year deal to take him to 37 right?


Correct.
Plus, why would I want to go to the NBA? Duke players suck in the pros.

- Shane Battier

Return to Los Angeles Clippers