ImageImageImage

We need shooting. Who do we get?

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,302
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#101 » by thinktank » Tue Jul 4, 2017 4:16 pm

So dump Aldrich for Milos.
User avatar
prefuse73
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,572
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: W1T1SG
         

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#102 » by prefuse73 » Tue Jul 4, 2017 4:18 pm

I don't think there is any team that would just absorb Aldrich for cap. Centers are dying in front of our eyes.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,746
And1: 5,234
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#103 » by minimus » Tue Jul 4, 2017 4:27 pm

gold0259 wrote:
minimus wrote:
Jammer wrote:
Yes, but they can only be signed for minimum.

You lose the right to pay 20% on top of their previous salary when they are renounced to make room for Teague and Gibson. This may cause Rush to walk to a bigger payday than the 9 year vet minimum of $2.1 million. Rush made $3.5 million last season.

Rush and Casspi won't actually be renounced until the paper work with Teague's and Gibson's signature's can be submitted to the league office. It's sort of simultaneous, but one preceeds the other, technically, by a millisecond.


Crap... I thought we can afford 4.2 mil to Rush which is a fair deal. To Casspi I'd offer only a vet.min. So Thibs better to start hunting player who are willing to accept minimum offers.



Rush is not worth 4.2 million period!


In comparison with Jordan Hill and Adrian Payne he is worth every cent.
MN7725
Veteran
Posts: 2,967
And1: 1,274
Joined: Jun 19, 2017

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#104 » by MN7725 » Tue Jul 4, 2017 5:04 pm

prefuse73 wrote:I don't think there is any team that would just absorb Aldrich for cap. Centers are dying in front of our eyes.


I don't think any team would for Dieng either

Guys like Valuncunias and Vucevic have been available forever and can't be moved
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,474
And1: 12,341
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#105 » by Worm Guts » Tue Jul 4, 2017 5:14 pm

thinktank wrote:So dump Aldrich for Milos.


As much as I would love to take a shot at Milos I have hard time spending resources on a backup PG when we have no backup wings.
User avatar
Loyal[]Wolf
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,282
And1: 455
Joined: Jan 25, 2017
Location: Florida
 

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#106 » by Loyal[]Wolf » Tue Jul 4, 2017 5:35 pm

Read on Twitter


Looks like we are still after him.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,305
And1: 6,350
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#107 » by KGdaBom » Tue Jul 4, 2017 6:16 pm

Loyal[]Wolf wrote:
Read on Twitter


Looks like we are still after him.

I've never been a fan, but based on last years stats he would be a bargain for the room exception. Shot over 40% from 3 on good volume.
Howard Cosell
Rookie
Posts: 1,181
And1: 313
Joined: Jun 01, 2013

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#108 » by Howard Cosell » Tue Jul 4, 2017 6:23 pm

Now that Gordon Hayward is signing with Celtics it's time for Thibs to get on phone with Ainge and offer...

Deing + 2018 1st RD Pick (OKC) for Crowder + Bradley or Smart.

C's need a BIG

Let's go!!!
User avatar
Maefteda
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,600
And1: 575
Joined: Feb 18, 2012
     

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#109 » by Maefteda » Tue Jul 4, 2017 6:26 pm

Celtics need to trade someone to fit Hayward's max in there. Crowder being the most likely one. There are probably a couple of deals in place already, so there might be something announced later today.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,456
And1: 19,508
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#110 » by shrink » Tue Jul 4, 2017 6:29 pm

MN7725 wrote:
prefuse73 wrote:I don't think there is any team that would just absorb Aldrich for cap. Centers are dying in front of our eyes.


I don't think any team would for Dieng either

Guys like Valuncunias and Vucevic have been available forever and can't be moved

I would make a small distinction.

I agree that the market for traditional 5's is drying up, as many teams go smaller. It's nice to have a big on the end of your bench when match ups demand it, but now you can probably get them pretty cheaply (and when we signed Cole in 2016, his contract WAS "cheaply.") So guys like Valuncunias, Vucevic, Kanter, and Okafor are not worth what hey once were. Those guys can score in the post, but they can't switch, get out to a three point shooter, or most importantly, defend the rim.

Cole is smart, can defend a little, play some pick and role, and protect the rim a little. He isn't as immovable as the other guys because he has a use. I agree that a team wouldn't absorb him into cap space, but he has a use with a team's plan, and so I think he isn't immovable like the other guys.

As for Dieng, $14-17 for a traditional center is a lot right now, but Dieng does so many important little things, that I don't consider him a bad deal. I don't think Taj is going to start over Gorgui. And Dieng is a particularly good fit for what Thibs is trying to do. I wouldn't mind seeing the wolves get off his money, but I think to Thibs and his two-big line ups, he has more value to the Wolves than to most other teams, and is unlikely to be traded.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,305
And1: 6,350
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#111 » by KGdaBom » Tue Jul 4, 2017 6:48 pm

shrink wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
prefuse73 wrote:I don't think there is any team that would just absorb Aldrich for cap. Centers are dying in front of our eyes.


I don't think any team would for Dieng either

Guys like Valuncunias and Vucevic have been available forever and can't be moved

I would make a small distinction.

I agree that the market for traditional 5's is drying up, as many teams go smaller. It's nice to have a big on the end of your bench when match ups demand it, but now you can probably get them pretty cheaply (and when we signed Cole in 2016, his contract WAS "cheaply.") So guys like Valuncunias, Vucevic, Kanter, and Okafor are not worth what hey once were. Those guys can score in the post, but they can't switch, get out to a three point shooter, or most importantly, defend the rim.

Cole is smart, can defend a little, play some pick and role, and protect the rim a little. He isn't as immovable as the other guys because he has a use. I agree that a team wouldn't absorb him into cap space, but he has a use with a team's plan, and so I think he isn't immovable like the other guys.

As for Dieng, $14-17 for a traditional center is a lot right now, but Dieng does so many important little things, that I don't consider him a bad deal. I don't think Taj is going to start over Gorgui. And Dieng is a particularly good fit for what Thibs is trying to do. I wouldn't mind seeing the wolves get off his money, but I think to Thibs and his two-big line ups, he has more value to the Wolves than to most other teams, and is unlikely to be traded.

We all know that teams are going with more small ball lineups. However, there is a very true saying in sports. Big and talented beats small and talented most of the time. Durant would not be as successful as he is if he were 6'5" instead of 6'9". If LeBron was 220 instead of 250 he wouldn't do as well either. So if a team can put bigger lineups with as much or more talent than smaller lineups the bigger team is going to win most of the time.
User avatar
Loyal[]Wolf
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,282
And1: 455
Joined: Jan 25, 2017
Location: Florida
 

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#112 » by Loyal[]Wolf » Tue Jul 4, 2017 7:33 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
Loyal[]Wolf wrote:
Read on Twitter


Looks like we are still after him.

I've never been a fan, but based on last years stats he would be a bargain for the room exception. Shot over 40% from 3 on good volume.


Career 37.6% from 3PT.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,456
And1: 19,508
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#113 » by shrink » Tue Jul 4, 2017 7:59 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
shrink wrote:I would make a small distinction.

I agree that the market for traditional 5's is drying up, as many teams go smaller. It's nice to have a big on the end of your bench when match ups demand it, but now you can probably get them pretty cheaply (and when we signed Cole in 2016, his contract WAS "cheaply.") So guys like Valuncunias, Vucevic, Kanter, and Okafor are not worth what hey once were. Those guys can score in the post, but they can't switch, get out to a three point shooter, or most importantly, defend the rim.

Cole is smart, can defend a little, play some pick and role, and protect the rim a little. He isn't as immovable as the other guys because he has a use. I agree that a team wouldn't absorb him into cap space, but he has a use with a team's plan, and so I think he isn't immovable like the other guys.

As for Dieng, $14-17 for a traditional center is a lot right now, but Dieng does so many important little things, that I don't consider him a bad deal. I don't think Taj is going to start over Gorgui. And Dieng is a particularly good fit for what Thibs is trying to do. I wouldn't mind seeing the wolves get off his money, but I think to Thibs and his two-big line ups, he has more value to the Wolves than to most other teams, and is unlikely to be traded.

We all know that teams are going with more small ball lineups. However, there is a very true saying in sports. Big and talented beats small and talented most of the time. Durant would not be as successful as he is if he were 6'5" instead of 6'9". If LeBron was 220 instead of 250 he wouldn't do as well either. So if a team can put bigger lineups with as much or more talent than smaller lineups the bigger team is going to win most of the time.


I agree with you. In a game of match-ups, being more talented trumps all. This is why contracts would be huge for the best players, and necessitated the max deal rules.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,305
And1: 6,350
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#114 » by KGdaBom » Tue Jul 4, 2017 8:03 pm

Loyal[]Wolf wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
Loyal[]Wolf wrote:
Read on Twitter


Looks like we are still after him.

I've never been a fan, but based on last years stats he would be a bargain for the room exception. Shot over 40% from 3 on good volume.


Career 37.6% from 3PT.

That's solid. However, maybe on a team like ours that can get him more open shots than he got In LA he can keep up the 40%. Even though he annoys me, I would have no problem with us signing him.
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#115 » by Biggsohnasty » Tue Jul 4, 2017 8:46 pm

I'm shocked that Thibs would want Nick Young. Unless it's just playing in L.A where every little dumb thing gets magnified and all we hear about Young is the clown show but there's a lot more to him that goes unnoticed maybe.

On paper his shooting can fit. Does he guard anybody? I've always felt like Young is just a player who makes losing plays. Maybe there's a lot more to him though.

I'd prefer they take the route of sign two wings - one vet and one youngster.

Vets I'd like (for room exception most likely): Afflalo, Miles, Sefolosha, Dunleavy, Young, Jeff Green
Youngsters I'd take a shot at (minimum deal as 4th wing): McDaniels, Young, Bullock, Jerami Grant

I also don't think it's wise to just hand the backup PG keys to Jones. I like him as a third guard but there a number of professional backup PGs that I'd rather pay to run a second unit than even a true backup wing. Lots of teams play multiple PGs on the floor.

If you have a bench of 'backup PG', 'Backup Wing', Bjelica and Dieng you can stagger your rotations and maybe play Teague and backup Pg at the same time.

Guys I'd look at to either be the backup or at least compete with Jones and serve as a parachute include Brandon Jennings, Ty Lawson, Aaron Brooks, Sessions, Stuckey
User avatar
Ace_Rockola
Rookie
Posts: 1,245
And1: 567
Joined: Jul 01, 2010
Location: Minnesota
 

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#116 » by Ace_Rockola » Tue Jul 4, 2017 8:56 pm

For a backup wing, I just don't care about defense. The best defender in the league does what? Drop a 40% 3pt shooter to 37%? Make them work a little harder? They're going to score anyway, we need someone who will hit shots and keep pace with them.
User avatar
C-Dub47
Junior
Posts: 428
And1: 233
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
 

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#117 » by C-Dub47 » Tue Jul 4, 2017 9:05 pm

Loyal[]Wolf wrote:
Read on Twitter


Looks like we are still after him.


Sign me up. Prefer Miles, but he'd fit the bill.
Duke4life831 wrote:Winslow > Wiggins
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#118 » by Biggsohnasty » Tue Jul 4, 2017 9:07 pm

Ace_Rockola wrote:For a backup wing, I just don't care about defense. The best defender in the league does what? Drop a 40% 3pt shooter to 37%? Make them work a little harder? They're going to score anyway, we need someone who will hit shots and keep pace with them.


Depends on what you want in your backup

If your backup wing is playing 20 minutes a night, a sieve on defense can tank a game for you.

If Butler or Wiggins sustains an injury and miss a couple weeks - backup wing has to start - if they are a sieve defensively you are now in big trouble.

They obviously aren't going to find an elite shooter+defender at this point but if they can find someone who is professional on both ends, I'd take that over a guy who's 'elite' (relative to what is available at this point) at one or the other.

The team was atrocious defensively - adding two good defenders isn't going to suddenly fix that. Yes they need more shooting. They also need a roster that will get more stops.
User avatar
prefuse73
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,572
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: W1T1SG
         

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#119 » by prefuse73 » Wed Jul 5, 2017 12:42 am

Hayward now on his way to Boston. Dieng and Pick for Crowder and Bradley would be nice if at all possible... I don't know. Sign Udoh into our room exception. Dunleavy for vet min.

Towns - Udoh - Aldrich
Gibson - Bjelica
Butler - Crowder - Dunleavy
Wiggins - (Butler / Bradley)
Teague - Bradley - Jones
Biggsohnasty
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
       

Re: We need shooting. Who do we get? 

Post#120 » by Biggsohnasty » Wed Jul 5, 2017 12:48 am

^ that would be amazing thought I'd be shocked if Boston didn't have better offers for both Bradley and Crowder.

Killer small ball lineups there too with either four of Bradley/Butler/Wiggins/Crowder/Teague on the floor late game plus KAT.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves