ImageImageImageImageImage

Otto Porter Part 2

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,158
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1601 » by DCZards » Wed Jul 5, 2017 12:30 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Wall won't sign that extension this year. I'm near certain of that. But if he did, it wouldn't come into effect until 2019-2020.

Leonsis won't wake up. Ernie is his useful scapegoat who he knows he won't ever have to fire because the local media sucks and the fan base has been demoralized for almost 4 decades.


Actually, the fan base--at least those who show up at the Verizon Center regularly--got a real jolt of energy and positivity last season. Question now is whether the Zards can carry that vibe into next season by continuing to play well and win games, especially at home.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,508
And1: 22,955
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1602 » by nate33 » Wed Jul 5, 2017 12:43 pm

TheNetsFan wrote:I'm obviously biased, but if I'm Washington I make calls over the next few days before matching. See what they could get with a $23+mil trade exception. If you believe in Oubre & depth is your biggest issue, $23mil could plug a few holes. If you can find depth, a sign & trade becomes an option. My understanding is that terms have been agreed upon, but nothing signed yet.

The Nets appeared to be the only team willing to extend a max. The Wizards are swallowing hard to match it. Basically, everyone likes Porter, but nobody really likes him much at that price. What makes you think Porter, on that contract, has enough value as a trade asset to bring back something useful in return?
Wizardspride
RealGM
Posts: 17,425
And1: 11,620
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Olney, MD/Kailua/Kaneohe, HI
       

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1603 » by Wizardspride » Wed Jul 5, 2017 12:44 pm

DCZards wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
Wall won't sign that extension this year. I'm near certain of that. But if he did, it wouldn't come into effect until 2019-2020.

Leonsis won't wake up. Ernie is his useful scapegoat who he knows he won't ever have to fire because the local media sucks and the fan base has been demoralized for almost 4 decades.


Actually, the fan base--at least those who show up at the Verizon Center regularly--got a real jolt of energy and positivity last season. Question now is whether the Zards can carry that vibe into next season by continuing to play well and win games, especially at home.



:nod:

President Donald Trump referred to African countries, Haiti and El Salvador as "shithole" nations during a meeting Thursday and asked why the U.S. can't have more immigrants from Norway.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1604 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 5, 2017 12:47 pm

Twitter is absolutely driving me crazy with the ignorant Otto Porter hate. These are the same people that would hype up the Twolves young core of Lavine-Wiggins-Towns lol
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,490
And1: 2,782
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1605 » by Kanyewest » Wed Jul 5, 2017 1:29 pm

NatP4 wrote:


This man could EASILY average 20 PPG with higher usage, also could get him more minutes at the 4 and post up him up WAY MORE, use him as a screener to get him even more shots. Should be taking the 2nd most shots on the team every night. Otto could easily be a 20 point 7 rebound 4 assist player if we just used him more.

Don't rule out the big leap next season. It's not really up to him though.


I like Porter and the video shows some nice moves against players like Kawhi and Covington. Still, a lot of the plays were against poor defenders including an aging Vince Carter, Damian Lillard, Ben McClemore, Bobby Portis JJ Reddick, Gordon Hayward, Ryan Anderson, Kelly Olynyk, Carmelo,LaMarcus Aldridge, and Seth Curry. Sometimes the defenders gave relatively poor effort like LeBron, Jonas, and Thadeus Young.

THat being said, I think Porter has room to grow his game and could develop to become even better. I wonder down the line if Washington will regret not giving Porter that extra year. We will have to wait and see.
User avatar
Doug_Blew
Junior
Posts: 442
And1: 378
Joined: Jul 19, 2003
Location: West Side

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1606 » by Doug_Blew » Wed Jul 5, 2017 1:34 pm

I was high on Porter in the playoffs 2 years ago when it looked like he could be something special. But I have lost the excitement for him. This year he was basically a 3 point specialist up until the all star break (maybe a little later). On offense he basically gave us what Rasual Buttler and Jared Dudley gave us. Both of them kind of faded towards the end of the year as well.

The only way i'd match this contract is if Porter is tradeable. If there's a trade kicker that makes it difficult to trade him, then I dont match. I think this could be the straw that breaks the camel's back with John Wall. I could easily seeing this being Juwan Howard part deux. If John Wall moves on, ala Webber, and leaves us with an above average Porter and a very good Beal running the show, i could see the boo birds showing up at the Verizon Center.

Porter makes it more difficult to shed contracts next season to get some cap space to sign Boogie or PGIII.
User avatar
Meliorus
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 1,185
Joined: Apr 16, 2015
 

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1607 » by Meliorus » Wed Jul 5, 2017 1:36 pm

NatP4 wrote:Twitter is absolutely driving me crazy with the ignorant Otto Porter hate. These are the same people that would hype up the Twolves young core of Lavine-Wiggins-Towns lol


PPG baby!! Barnes is so much better than Otto!! 20 PPG!! Wiggins best scorer!!
VeeJay24
Starter
Posts: 2,081
And1: 11
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Washington DC
       

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1608 » by VeeJay24 » Wed Jul 5, 2017 1:38 pm

NatP4 wrote:


This man could EASILY average 20 PPG with higher usage, also could get him more minutes at the 4 and post up him up WAY MORE, use him as a screener to get him even more shots. Should be taking the 2nd most shots on the team every night. Otto could easily be a 20 point 7 rebound 4 assist player if we just used him more.

Don't rule out the big leap next season. It's not really up to him though.


Exactly, He could be so much better; if the coach used him more. Otto is multi talented and could easily avg. 20 and at least 7 to 8 rbs, plus 3-4 assts. The coach needs to design an offense that's not heavy Wall/Beal oriented.

Also, the best thing for the Wizards is for the Pels to be out of the playoff race by the trade deadline. Try to get him at the trade deadline an obtain the bird rights.
Sportz Gza
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,487
And1: 2,136
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1609 » by Dark Faze » Wed Jul 5, 2017 1:52 pm

Man get your ass out there and get up shots.

Tired of excuses about what a coach allows someone to do or not do. This is a grownup league. Markieff Morris came from this team after being vilified as a horrible teammate coming from Phoenix--he had every reason to come in here and stfu and just play defense and not rock the boat--and right off the bat he put up more shots than Otto in his first and second season here. Do you guys really think the coach gave out some kind of order for Kieff to take a ton of shots? Or this past season did he tell Gortat to drop his field goal attempts per game by 2 shots?

All of that stuff is aggressiveness and confidence. Otto can absolutely put up more shots--but please don't try to say dumb stuff like "but it's not up to him."
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,625
And1: 5,233
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1610 » by tontoz » Wed Jul 5, 2017 2:34 pm

This was only Porter's second season as a starter. It isn't exactly unusual for a young guy to defer to vets. He averaged 14.9 pts per 36 minutes with a TS of 63.5% and people are complaining lol.

Morris averaged only 1.2 pts more per 36.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,508
And1: 22,955
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1611 » by nate33 » Wed Jul 5, 2017 2:34 pm

Dark Faze wrote:Man get your ass out there and get up shots.

Tired of excuses about what a coach allows someone to do or not do. This is a grownup league. Markieff Morris came from this team after being vilified as a horrible teammate coming from Phoenix--he had every reason to come in here and stfu and just play defense and not rock the boat--and right off the bat he put up more shots than Otto in his first and second season here. Do you guys really think the coach gave out some kind of order for Kieff to take a ton of shots? Or this past season did he tell Gortat to drop his field goal attempts per game by 2 shots?

All of that stuff is aggressiveness and confidence. Otto can absolutely put up more shots--but please don't try to say dumb stuff like "but it's not up to him."

Agreed. It's up to Otto to be more aggressive. From what we know, Brooks and Porter's teammates are consistently encouraging him to shoot more. Don't blame them.
TheNetsFan
Head Coach
Posts: 7,424
And1: 2,823
Joined: Feb 11, 2007
   

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1612 » by TheNetsFan » Wed Jul 5, 2017 2:56 pm

nate33 wrote:
TheNetsFan wrote:I'm obviously biased, but if I'm Washington I make calls over the next few days before matching. See what they could get with a $23+mil trade exception. If you believe in Oubre & depth is your biggest issue, $23mil could plug a few holes. If you can find depth, a sign & trade becomes an option. My understanding is that terms have been agreed upon, but nothing signed yet.

The Nets appeared to be the only team willing to extend a max. The Wizards are swallowing hard to match it. Basically, everyone likes Porter, but nobody really likes him much at that price. What makes you think Porter, on that contract, has enough value as a trade asset to bring back something useful in return?

My point is that if the offer sheet has only been agreed upon, and not yet signed (likely), the Wizards could S&T him to the Nets, and receive back cheap depth (e.g. RHJ ) and a massive trade exception ($23+mil). That trade exception could then be shopped to receive S&T of other FAs or players from teams trying to shed some payroll (Portland, OKC, Boston, etc.). Boston would be the best fit talent-wise (e.g. Crowder), but it's doubtful that they'd help a division rival unless they had no other choice.
User avatar
BigA
Analyst
Posts: 3,091
And1: 999
Joined: Oct 05, 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1613 » by BigA » Wed Jul 5, 2017 3:02 pm

TheNetsFan wrote:
nate33 wrote:
TheNetsFan wrote:I'm obviously biased, but if I'm Washington I make calls over the next few days before matching. See what they could get with a $23+mil trade exception. If you believe in Oubre & depth is your biggest issue, $23mil could plug a few holes. If you can find depth, a sign & trade becomes an option. My understanding is that terms have been agreed upon, but nothing signed yet.

The Nets appeared to be the only team willing to extend a max. The Wizards are swallowing hard to match it. Basically, everyone likes Porter, but nobody really likes him much at that price. What makes you think Porter, on that contract, has enough value as a trade asset to bring back something useful in return?

My point is that if the offer sheet has only been agreed upon, and not yet signed (likely), the Wizards could S&T him to the Nets, and receive back cheap depth (e.g. RHJ ) and a massive trade exception ($23+mil). That trade exception could then be shopped to receive S&T of other FAs or players from teams trying to shed some payroll (Portland, OKC, Boston, etc.). Boston would be the best fit talent-wise (e.g. Crowder), but it's doubtful that they'd help a division rival unless they had no other choice.

Talent-wise, paying Porter is likely to be the best use of that $, by far.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,335
And1: 7,439
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1614 » by FAH1223 » Wed Jul 5, 2017 3:03 pm

DCZards wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
Wall won't sign that extension this year. I'm near certain of that. But if he did, it wouldn't come into effect until 2019-2020.

Leonsis won't wake up. Ernie is his useful scapegoat who he knows he won't ever have to fire because the local media sucks and the fan base has been demoralized for almost 4 decades.


Actually, the fan base--at least those who show up at the Verizon Center regularly--got a real jolt of energy and positivity last season. Question now is whether the Zards can carry that vibe into next season by continuing to play well and win games, especially at home.


Last season was fun. But the elephant in the room is Grunfeld and he represents failure of 4 decades spanning to the last Finals appearence this franchise has had.
Image
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,487
And1: 2,136
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1615 » by Dark Faze » Wed Jul 5, 2017 3:07 pm

nate33 wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:Man get your ass out there and get up shots.

Tired of excuses about what a coach allows someone to do or not do. This is a grownup league. Markieff Morris came from this team after being vilified as a horrible teammate coming from Phoenix--he had every reason to come in here and stfu and just play defense and not rock the boat--and right off the bat he put up more shots than Otto in his first and second season here. Do you guys really think the coach gave out some kind of order for Kieff to take a ton of shots? Or this past season did he tell Gortat to drop his field goal attempts per game by 2 shots?

All of that stuff is aggressiveness and confidence. Otto can absolutely put up more shots--but please don't try to say dumb stuff like "but it's not up to him."

Agreed. It's up to Otto to be more aggressive. From what we know, Brooks and Porter's teammates are consistently encouraging him to shoot more. Don't blame them.


For what its worth I have a feeling he's going to be much more productive this year. It would help to get him more minutes. He should be averaging 35 minutes a night easy. Maybe it requires Kelly to spend more time on the floor with Otto, but that shouldn't be a problem.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,625
And1: 5,233
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1616 » by tontoz » Wed Jul 5, 2017 3:09 pm

TheNetsFan wrote:My point is that if the offer sheet has only been agreed upon, and not yet signed (likely), the Wizards could S&T him to the Nets, and receive back cheap depth (e.g. RHJ ) and a massive trade exception ($23+mil). That trade exception could then be shopped to receive S&T of other FAs or players from teams trying to shed some payroll (Portland, OKC, Boston, etc.). Boston would be the best fit talent-wise (e.g. Crowder), but it's doubtful that they'd help a division rival unless they had no other choice.


Deals can't be signed until the 7th. We are going to match. I can't see any SNT deals happening.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,335
And1: 7,439
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1617 » by FAH1223 » Wed Jul 5, 2017 3:29 pm

Kevin and Becker wrote this

Read on Twitter
Image
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1618 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 5, 2017 3:57 pm

Meliorus wrote:
NatP4 wrote:Twitter is absolutely driving me crazy with the ignorant Otto Porter hate. These are the same people that would hype up the Twolves young core of Lavine-Wiggins-Towns lol


PPG baby!! Barnes is so much better than Otto!! 20 PPG!! Wiggins best scorer!!



"I COULD AVERAGE 13 PPG GIVE ME 100 MILLION"
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1619 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 5, 2017 4:07 pm

Dark Faze wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:Man get your ass out there and get up shots.

Tired of excuses about what a coach allows someone to do or not do. This is a grownup league. Markieff Morris came from this team after being vilified as a horrible teammate coming from Phoenix--he had every reason to come in here and stfu and just play defense and not rock the boat--and right off the bat he put up more shots than Otto in his first and second season here. Do you guys really think the coach gave out some kind of order for Kieff to take a ton of shots? Or this past season did he tell Gortat to drop his field goal attempts per game by 2 shots?

All of that stuff is aggressiveness and confidence. Otto can absolutely put up more shots--but please don't try to say dumb stuff like "but it's not up to him."

Agreed. It's up to Otto to be more aggressive. From what we know, Brooks and Porter's teammates are consistently encouraging him to shoot more. Don't blame them.


For what its worth I have a feeling he's going to be much more productive this year. It would help to get him more minutes. He should be averaging 35 minutes a night easy. Maybe it requires Kelly to spend more time on the floor with Otto, but that shouldn't be a problem.



Except that is a problem.....because despite it being our best lineup, Brooks refuses to use it. And we don't run a single set for Otto, Wall and Morris take all the shots that he should be getting.

He should be averaging 35 minutes a night, he should be playing big minutes at power forward, he should be handling the rock in pick and rolls just as much as Brad, he should be posted up 3-4 times per game, hell, he should be given the rock to ISO a few times per night, he can score in isolation also.

We have the same problem with KO to a lesser extent, with Randy, KO would drive recklessly at the basket and handle the ball in pick and rolls even if it was a disaster, but with Brooks he's been told to just stand in the corner and spot up shoot, they don't even let him push the ball after a rebound. We basically completely quit developing Oubre as a secondary scorer at all. He watches Bojan fail at scoring or Marcus Thornton disgrace the game of basketball.

Now the difference is, Otto actually has the skill, Oubre probably not, but the question is, does our environment/offense even allow for another young player to develop into a star offensive player if he isn't a selfish ISO scorer?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,508
And1: 22,955
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Otto Porter Part 2 

Post#1620 » by nate33 » Wed Jul 5, 2017 4:22 pm

NatP4 wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:
nate33 wrote:Agreed. It's up to Otto to be more aggressive. From what we know, Brooks and Porter's teammates are consistently encouraging him to shoot more. Don't blame them.


For what its worth I have a feeling he's going to be much more productive this year. It would help to get him more minutes. He should be averaging 35 minutes a night easy. Maybe it requires Kelly to spend more time on the floor with Otto, but that shouldn't be a problem.



Except that is a problem.....because despite it being our best lineup, Brooks refuses to use it. And we don't run a single set for Otto, Wall and Morris take all the shots that he should be getting.

He should be averaging 35 minutes a night, he should be playing big minutes at power forward, he should be handling the rock in pick and rolls just as much as Brad, he should be posted up 3-4 times per game, hell, he should be given the rock to ISO a few times per night, he can score in isolation also.

We have the same problem with KO to a lesser extent, with Randy, KO would drive recklessly at the basket and handle the ball in pick and rolls even if it was a disaster, but with Brooks he's been told to just stand in the corner and spot up shoot, they don't even let him push the ball after a rebound. We basically completely quit developing Oubre as a secondary scorer at all. He watches Bojan fail at scoring or Marcus Thornton disgrace the game of basketball.

Now the difference is, Otto actually has the skill, Oubre probably not, but the question is, does our environment/offense even allow for another young player to develop into a star offensive player if he isn't a selfish ISO scorer?

Otto has some minor durability issues. Usually his back or his hip flexor starts to bother him halfway through the season. I think that's why he plays 30 minutes a game and not 35-36. It's not problems with roster balance or an unwillingness to play him at PF.

Return to Washington Wizards