ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#21 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 5:58 pm

parker has played 3 seasons, he has one year left right?

would assume they don't wanna pay the max to a player that plays one end of the court and has had two major knee injuries.
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,152
And1: 5,852
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#22 » by 80sballboy » Wed Jul 12, 2017 6:15 pm

NatP4 wrote:parker has played 3 seasons, he has one year left right?

would assume they don't wanna pay the max to a player that plays one end of the court and has had two major knee injuries.


http://www.spotrac.com/nba/milwaukee-bucks/jabari-parker-15354/
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#23 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 6:51 pm

80sballboy wrote:
NatP4 wrote:parker has played 3 seasons, he has one year left right?

would assume they don't wanna pay the max to a player that plays one end of the court and has had two major knee injuries.


http://www.spotrac.com/nba/milwaukee-bucks/jabari-parker-15354/


oh, I guess I didn't know top picks got 5 years on the rookie deal, when is the cut off between 4 years/5 years relative to draft position?
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,567
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#24 » by LyricalRico » Wed Jul 12, 2017 7:25 pm

NatP4 wrote:
80sballboy wrote:
NatP4 wrote:parker has played 3 seasons, he has one year left right?

would assume they don't wanna pay the max to a player that plays one end of the court and has had two major knee injuries.


http://www.spotrac.com/nba/milwaukee-bucks/jabari-parker-15354/


oh, I guess I didn't know top picks got 5 years on the rookie deal, when is the cut off between 4 years/5 years relative to draft position?


My experience with most salary sites is that they include a phantom "5th" year at the end of rookie contracts to signify the qualifying offer since it counts against the cap. Since most players don't play for the qualifying offer, it means that most first round picks go 4 years on their rookie deal and then they are RFA (assuming no prior extension). Some can be less than 4 years if the team doesn't pick up their 3rd or 4th year, and of course second round picks are a different ball game.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,824
And1: 9,212
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#25 » by payitforward » Wed Jul 12, 2017 8:06 pm

No on acquiring Parker for... yet another R1 pick! Does no one have any ideas other than to give away R1 picks?

Anyway, Jabari Parker has proved to be a pretty bad player. Not interested.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,488
And1: 2,140
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#26 » by Dark Faze » Wed Jul 12, 2017 8:27 pm

funny thing is the bucks fans said no from the opposite side on their board lol

I guess everyone just values their own huh
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,824
And1: 9,212
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#27 » by payitforward » Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:16 pm

Dark Faze wrote:funny thing is the bucks fans said no from the opposite side on their board lol

I guess everyone just values their own huh

Yup, fans have a tendency to over-value their players. I imagine they don't exactly see Markieff Morris as bringing very much in such a deal. Which would be correct.

Fans -- ours & theirs -- also tend to give insufficient value to R1 picks, which after all are abstractions -- not players they root for & get attached to.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,563
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#28 » by gambitx777 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:43 pm

I would not trade a first for jabari as injury prone as he is. Not Morris either. Not I would drop a first and mahinmi to the bucks for Henson and Parker if Parker agrees to a reasonable extension before the trade. If that's the case sure. Something like 8-9 mill a year is fair for a 3 year extension. But that probably would not happen
User avatar
Meliorus
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 1,185
Joined: Apr 16, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#29 » by Meliorus » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:34 pm

Parker is so bad. Classic team-better-when-you're-in-a-suit. If he can't play a lick of defense in an environment that prides itself in defense, the true physical limitations will always be there.
User avatar
adarsh1
Junior
Posts: 470
And1: 62
Joined: Dec 04, 2004
Contact:

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#30 » by adarsh1 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 3:50 am

You can't use him as a Sixth man immediate offense scoring guy? I feel like he and Jahlil Okafor are classic buy-low guys that add a boatload of scoring.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#31 » by NatP4 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 4:21 am

adarsh1 wrote:You can't use him as a Sixth man immediate offense scoring guy? I feel like he and Jahlil Okafor are classic buy-low guys that add a boatload of scoring.


It's funny cause people drool over KAT and Wiggins who are actually just as bad defensively. But I guess it depends on just how buy low it would really be. Everyone could use a 20&6&3 guy.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,827
And1: 7,961
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#32 » by montestewart » Thu Jul 13, 2017 4:45 am

NatP4 wrote:
adarsh1 wrote:You can't use him as a Sixth man immediate offense scoring guy? I feel like he and Jahlil Okafor are classic buy-low guys that add a boatload of scoring.


It's funny cause people drool over KAT and Wiggins who are actually just as bad defensively. But I guess it depends on just how buy low it would really be. Everyone could use a 20&6&3 guy.

Hey bucko, I know how to spot fake news. Wiggins is as bad defensively, and consequently not many people drool over him. He just has some ancy fass moves. Towns is far better offensively, and consequently people rate him as a far better player.

Okafor or Parker are not really efficiently productive players. I could see them being such in a compressed and more tightly defined sixth man role that took advantage of matchups. I'm thinking along the lines of Antawn Jamison in his one year with the Mavs, when he was Sixth Man of the Year and his FG% and TS% were far higher than any other year. It would have to be for much less money than they probably want.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,563
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#33 » by gambitx777 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 4:47 am

Borris diow and joe johnson for mahinmi and 2018 second and Aaron White. They really need a back up center and they are trying to trade diow and joe is a bit redundant on tht team.
User avatar
Meliorus
Analyst
Posts: 3,646
And1: 1,185
Joined: Apr 16, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#34 » by Meliorus » Thu Jul 13, 2017 4:49 am

NatP4 wrote:
adarsh1 wrote:You can't use him as a Sixth man immediate offense scoring guy? I feel like he and Jahlil Okafor are classic buy-low guys that add a boatload of scoring.


It's funny cause people drool over KAT and Wiggins who are actually just as bad defensively. But I guess it depends on just how buy low it would really be. Everyone could use a 20&6&3 guy.


No Okafor is bad on offense and HORRIBLE DANGEROUSLY BAD on defense. Add it together you have a contender for worst players in the league. KAT is really good on offense, and he started playing inspired defense after the All-Star break. Wiggins sucks. Jabari sucks.

KAT is the only one of the four who will likely be good (he already is quite good).
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#35 » by NatP4 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 4:51 am

montestewart wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
adarsh1 wrote:You can't use him as a Sixth man immediate offense scoring guy? I feel like he and Jahlil Okafor are classic buy-low guys that add a boatload of scoring.


It's funny cause people drool over KAT and Wiggins who are actually just as bad defensively. But I guess it depends on just how buy low it would really be. Everyone could use a 20&6&3 guy.

Hey bucko, I know how to spot fake news. Wiggins is as bad defensively, and consequently not many people drool over him. He just has some ancy fass moves. Towns is far better offensively, and consequently people rate him as a far better player.

Okafor or Parker are not really efficiently productive players. I could see them being such in a compressed and more tightly defined sixth man role that took advantage of matchups. I'm thinking along the lines of Antawn Jamison in his one year with the Mavs, when he was Sixth Man of the Year and his FG% and TS% were far higher than any other year. It would have to be for much less money than they probably want.



...which is why I was talking about defense and a potential "buy low" situation. No one is talking about buying low on 6th man Karl Anthony Towns.
deneem4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 1,263
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#36 » by deneem4 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:27 am

gambitx777 wrote:Borris diow and joe johnson for mahinmi and 2018 second and Aaron White. They really need a back up center and they are trying to trade diow and joe is a bit redundant on tht team.


I was thinking about that but including gortat instead considering mahinmi value
Pay your beals....or its lights out!!!
Bron, Bosh, Wade is like Mike, Hakeem, barkley...3 top 5 picks from same draft
mike, hakeem and Barkley on the same team!!!!
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#37 » by NatP4 » Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:29 am

Read on Twitter


There you have it, Gortat frustrated because of Walls poor on ball defense that he gets blamed for, wants Wall to be a better leader and two way player.


Side note: wall busy referring to other teammate as role player and complaining about first team all defense exclusion. This is bad. Per usual, fanbase will throw 33 year old role player under the bus to deflect criticism from star player/leader
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,827
And1: 7,961
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#38 » by montestewart » Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:21 pm

NatP4 wrote:
Read on Twitter


There you have it, Gortat frustrated because of Walls poor on ball defense that he gets blamed for, wants Wall to be a better leader and two way player.


Side note: wall busy referring to other teammate as role player and complaining about first team all defense exclusion. This is bad. Per usual, fanbase will throw 33 year old role player under the bus to deflect criticism from star player/leader


From the article:
Wall has acknowledged that his conditioning has to be better to be a more effective two-way player and appease Gortat's desire to see him improve as a leader.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,488
And1: 2,140
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#39 » by Dark Faze » Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:38 pm

its a give and take thing--we'd love for Wall to be a better two way player, but I'd let him be terrible defensively if he could be a consistent 27/11/4 guy on great efficiency.

When Gortats offensive responsibility goes down, the expectation is for his defense to go up. The problem people have with Gortat is they see his role offensively has declined (his fault or not doesn't matter) but there was no noticeable uptick defensively. I think its a fair argument. It's one I use with Porter as well--the idea that if you're going to be low usage, then I want to see more from you defensively since you have the energy for it.

I do think with Wall some of it is more horrific defensive IQ than it is effort.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIV 

Post#40 » by Ruzious » Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:57 pm

payitforward wrote:No on acquiring Parker for... yet another R1 pick! Does no one have any ideas other than to give away R1 picks?

Anyway, Jabari Parker has proved to be a pretty bad player. Not interested.

Parker and Giannis both dramatically improved last season before the very unfortunate 2nd ACL injury Parker's suffered. It was fun to watch them develop together. Parker's a tremendous offensive talent, got in the best shape of his career, and even finally played a little defense. It probably makes little sense for Milwaukee to trade him or for anyone to trade for him given the uncertainty about his health and his contract situation. He's expected back sometime in February.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams

Return to Washington Wizards