ImageImageImageImageImage

2017 Nets Offseason Thread III

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
TheBrooklynKidd
Head Coach
Posts: 7,208
And1: 3,726
Joined: Jul 31, 2013
     

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#961 » by TheBrooklynKidd » Sat Jul 15, 2017 1:53 pm

oldjim wrote:
hood30 wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:I hear that, but sometimes I feel like we start getting into the mode of thinking that all these guys are actually going to develop, when some of them won't even be in the league in 3 years. Or a lot of times when you look at successful role players, they don't wind up effective players until 6 or 7 years down the line, while on their 3rd team, no matter which organization drafted them.

I mean I do like both these guys, but sometimes you have to look at it from the outside. If these 2 were on a different team, would we really believe they were either valuable, or that they were likely to ever be more than a standard issue 12mpg rotation guy and 2 or 3 seasons down the line?

These guys are pretty expendable imho, at least in a deal like this.


Agree with this..Sometimes, people talk as if all these young guys are guaranteed to eventually improve into players good enough to be starters in this league...Some of that is based on the idea Kenny can magically turn any average looking young player into a good player, so even a guy like RHJ can't be traded for an older very good player.

DLo is the only guy that has a chance of actually become a star...LeVert bar is as a good starting role player...After that, most of other young guys will probably only become role players off the bench....You can't treat all of them the same as for development.


whitehead will be better than patrick beverly ,he is athletic. A very good role player or starter level player.
levert will be next batum, a star player but not allstar.
russell , if he improve his defense at least to the foye's defensive level, he will be a star player , but not allstar level. he is not athletic.


I respectfully disagree with your projections. Personally I don't think white head will be as good as Patrick Beverly on defense but could end up being a better penetrator.

I'm also higher on LeVert than most people. I'm actually in the very small minority that thinks that LeVert has a higher ceiling than DLo. I know the Harden comparison is thrown around for DLo a lot, but I think that LeVert is more likely to reach that level, along with being a great defender. IMO he's just a much more unique and dynamic offensive player and could be truly dominant with his mix of size, athleticism, ball handling and versatile scoring ability. I think DLo is more likely to turn into Kemba Walker, and will be better than LeVert for a decent amount of time but I could see LeVert passing him eventually.
User avatar
TheBrooklynKidd
Head Coach
Posts: 7,208
And1: 3,726
Joined: Jul 31, 2013
     

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#962 » by TheBrooklynKidd » Sat Jul 15, 2017 2:12 pm

JoseRizal wrote:I don't know with you guys but I'm a bit disappointed with us not being able to sign KCP.

Not to assume, but I think we could've gotten him for 4/60 or 4/70. There were no reports that our FO met with him and his rep. More years means better security from a player's standpoint. We could've easily beaten LA's 1-year offer.

Having a KCP would've added legit starters to the team as well as strong competition with our wings. He will keep Dlo, CLV, IW and the rest of our youngsters up in their toes. Now, we have no choice but to roll the season with half of our summer league team, unless there are last minute acquisitions/transactions to be made.

He may have flaws in his game, but KCP is a competitor and a very good defender. It would make our team a bit respectable and competitive. He's still young and would've been either a part of our core or a good tradeable asset to have.

I really don't understand why Marks didn't pursue him. He would've been a good consolation prize after lucking out on Porter at almost half the price. Now we're left with bread crumbs and a large unused capspace.

Do we really need to add more dead weight contracts for a late pick? We already have Mozgov, Carroll & Nicholson. Having a young former-lotto pick with starter experience would've been really big in our campaign. It's a no-brainer gamble imo.

I really hope Marks proves me wrong and that he has a better plan. So far, this is the only letdown I have in the Marksman regime...


Well, personally I think there were a bunch of factors that played into Marks decision making regarding KCP:

1. Marks probably offered KCP what his actual worth was since he was UFA and Marks didn't have to outbid a incumbent team. This is apparent because KCP took a 1 year 18 mill deal which means his other offers were probably lower than the Pistons offer of 5years/16 a year.

2. Marks probably foresaw the roster log jam and drama that would unfold. KCP wasnt really a sf and having him on the roster would force one of Lin/DL/LeVert to the bench and make LeVert a forward exclusively in the future, which from my understanding isn't what the want him to play.

3. Marks probably realized how difficult it would be to do the Carroll trade, sign KCP to a contract his agent liked and still be able to go after RFAs next offseason. In fact if they signed KCP to something like 4 years/16 a year, they would have had to convince Lin to opt out just to make enough space to make a viable bid. The RFA group next season is much stronger IMO and a better fit than this years. Next years RFA is packed with forwards like Wiggins, Parker, Gordon and Randle all who would fill a need on this team and not impede on the LeVert/Russell backcourt.

So overall I'm not really disappointed about the move. He was a weird fit and took away some of our teams potential size advantages on the wings. I also believe that his offensive production and role could be replaced by a much cheaper player.
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#963 » by Netaman » Sat Jul 15, 2017 2:23 pm

I think it's highly likely KCP wasn't going to sign long term unless he got a better deal than what he passed up from Detroit (5/80). The AAV on that comes out to 16M per, and he allegedly thought he was worth closer to 20m. I assume the 18m from the Lakers was the biggest AAV he could get since 1 year deals are usually inflated, which means us and anyone else with offers on the table for him were likely around the Pistons offer and 1 year less. Starting at SG in LA for a year isn't the worst thing anyone has ever chosen to do vs. coming off the bench in Brooklyn. Reddick essentially made the same decision.
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#964 » by Netaman » Sat Jul 15, 2017 2:34 pm

Also I agree with those who are disappointed that we could land KCP. This team needs more talent and he's a respectable, young, starting caliber player who plays tough D. Like Ian Eagle said I don't think Marks is done, at least until we see him start adding vets on 1 year deals like he did last year with Foye/Vazquez/Scola, so I'm hopeful he has another move up his sleeve. Monroe for 1 year would be really interesting because he's a pretty good fit for what we need. Faried is interesting as well even though he's not the best compliment for Mozgov. If they come with draft picks even better.
hood30
Rookie
Posts: 1,108
And1: 229
Joined: Nov 30, 2015

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#965 » by hood30 » Sat Jul 15, 2017 2:38 pm

TheBrooklynKidd wrote:
JoseRizal wrote:I don't know with you guys but I'm a bit disappointed with us not being able to sign KCP.

Not to assume, but I think we could've gotten him for 4/60 or 4/70. There were no reports that our FO met with him and his rep. More years means better security from a player's standpoint. We could've easily beaten LA's 1-year offer.

Having a KCP would've added legit starters to the team as well as strong competition with our wings. He will keep Dlo, CLV, IW and the rest of our youngsters up in their toes. Now, we have no choice but to roll the season with half of our summer league team, unless there are last minute acquisitions/transactions to be made.

He may have flaws in his game, but KCP is a competitor and a very good defender. It would make our team a bit respectable and competitive. He's still young and would've been either a part of our core or a good tradeable asset to have.

I really don't understand why Marks didn't pursue him. He would've been a good consolation prize after lucking out on Porter at almost half the price. Now we're left with bread crumbs and a large unused capspace.

Do we really need to add more dead weight contracts for a late pick? We already have Mozgov, Carroll & Nicholson. Having a young former-lotto pick with starter experience would've been really big in our campaign. It's a no-brainer gamble imo.

I really hope Marks proves me wrong and that he has a better plan. So far, this is the only letdown I have in the Marksman regime...



Well, personally I think there were a bunch of factors that played into Marks decision making regarding KCP:

1. Marks probably offered KCP what his actual worth was since he was UFA and Marks didn't have to outbid a incumbent team. This is apparent because KCP took a 1 year 18 mill deal which means his other offers were probably lower than the Pistons offer of 5years/16 a year.

2. Marks probably foresaw the roster log jam and drama that would unfold. KCP wasnt really a sf and having him on the roster would force one of Lin/DL/LeVert to the bench and make LeVert a forward exclusively in the future, which from my understanding isn't what the want him to play.

3. Marks probably realized how difficult it would be to do the Carroll trade, sign KCP to a contract his agent liked and still be able to go after RFAs next offseason. In fact if they signed KCP to something like 4 years/16 a year, they would have had to convince Lin to opt out just to make enough space to make a viable bid. The RFA group next season is much stronger IMO and a better fit than this years. Next years RFA is packed with forwards like Wiggins, Parker, Gordon and Randle all who would fill a need on this team and not impede on the LeVert/Russell backcourt.

So overall I'm not really disappointed about the move. He was a weird fit and took away some of our teams potential size advantages on the wings. I also believe that his offensive production and role could be replaced by a much cheaper player.


Marks didn't sign KCP because he simply didn't think he was better than Lin even as a SG..That simple...You don't make him the highest paid player on the team unless you are sure his offensive productivity would be higher than both DLo and Lin....

Marks is high on a 2-play-maker system and Lin fits perfectly alongside Russell for that other guard spot...They wouldn't sign Redick, a more productive player although older because they thought Lin was the more rounded player for what they wanted for their system.
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,272
And1: 1,323
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#966 » by Netaman » Sat Jul 15, 2017 2:44 pm

I think the simplest answer to why Marks didn't sign KCP is that he wanted more $ than Marks thought he was worth. No need to overcomplicate.
User avatar
imanshar
Sophomore
Posts: 221
And1: 54
Joined: Dec 18, 2015
       

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#967 » by imanshar » Sat Jul 15, 2017 6:11 pm

Remaining free agents:

Shabbaz, Mirotic, Green, Speights, Mbah a Moute

Do you think Marks will go after any of them?
User avatar
Claud
Starter
Posts: 2,005
And1: 880
Joined: May 16, 2015
Location: Austin, TX
   

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#968 » by Claud » Sat Jul 15, 2017 6:19 pm

imanshar wrote:Remaining free agents:

Shabbaz, Mirotic, Green, Speights, Mbah a Moute

Do you think Marks will go after any of them?



Maybe Green or Mirotic... don't see the point of Shabbaz or Mbah a moute.

We still need a stretch big tbh.
Roy Tarpley
Veteran
Posts: 2,888
And1: 987
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
     

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#969 » by Roy Tarpley » Sat Jul 15, 2017 6:22 pm

I don't see why Marks would go after any of these dudes. The team is basically stocked at every position and playing time will be a concern. We might need a little help at C, but Booker and Nicholson can play spot minutes there in a small ball lineup.

The only other move I see is maybe if there's a salary dump situation where we get rid of Nicholson and get back a draft pick. But since we're already in the 2018 draft now, there's no real urgency for draft picks either.
User avatar
Claud
Starter
Posts: 2,005
And1: 880
Joined: May 16, 2015
Location: Austin, TX
   

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#970 » by Claud » Sat Jul 15, 2017 6:23 pm

For those asking the other day...

. If the Raptors wind up in the lottery, the pick will transfer to Brooklyn in the first year Toronto is out of the lottery through 2023. If the pick still hasn’t been transferred, the Nets get the Raptors second rounders in 2023 and 2024. (The Nets own pick goes to the Celtics, the result of the 2013 trade for Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett and Jason Terry.)


In regards to Nets/Raps trade According to NI.
FlipFlopShot
Pro Prospect
Posts: 985
And1: 330
Joined: Jun 12, 2015
     

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#971 » by FlipFlopShot » Sat Jul 15, 2017 6:46 pm

Simmons is off the table.
User avatar
Hello Brooklyn
RealGM
Posts: 17,547
And1: 13,324
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
   

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#972 » by Hello Brooklyn » Sat Jul 15, 2017 6:53 pm

Very good off season for Sean Marks.

-No bad contracts
-Acquired a First Round Pick in a stacked draft
-Got a potential all-star in D-Lo

I give him an A

I know some of you are sad about passing on KCP, but its clear that he wanted a huge contract. His deal in LA is made specifically for him to get a big pay day after the season. Hes essentially betting on himself.

When we look back on this time, I am sure we will be happy we didn't invest 100 million in a Shooting Guard who cannot shoot. That's just my opinion.
User avatar
TheBrooklynKidd
Head Coach
Posts: 7,208
And1: 3,726
Joined: Jul 31, 2013
     

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#973 » by TheBrooklynKidd » Sat Jul 15, 2017 7:30 pm

Hello Brooklyn wrote:Very good off season for Sean Marks.

-No bad contracts
-Acquired a First Round Pick in a stacked draft
-Got a potential all-star in D-Lo

I give him an A

I know some of you are sad about passing on KCP, but its clear that he wanted a huge contract. His deal in LA is made specifically for him to get a big pay day after the season. Hes essentially betting on himself.

When we look back on this time, I am sure we will be happy we didn't invest 100 million in a Shooting Guard who cannot shoot. That's just my opinion.


I agree especially if we turn around and use that money on a RFA next year that actually fits our young core.
Ror1997
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 911
Joined: Jun 30, 2014

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#974 » by Ror1997 » Sat Jul 15, 2017 7:49 pm

Claud wrote:
imanshar wrote:Remaining free agents:

Shabbaz, Mirotic, Green, Speights, Mbah a Moute

Do you think Marks will go after any of them?



Maybe Green or Mirotic... don't see the point of Shabbaz or Mbah a moute.

We still need a stretch big tbh.


Speights is a stretch big. Been saying for weeks we need to get him on the team.

Also I like Green or Mitotic. I'd do 3/27-3/33 on both but I only want one of them obviously
User avatar
moonpie
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 2,692
Joined: Dec 14, 2010
     

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#975 » by moonpie » Sat Jul 15, 2017 7:57 pm

Nikola Mirotic (Age: 26) stats in games with at least 28 minutes played last season (20 games):

16.7 PPG
7.8 RPG
1.5 APG
0.8 SPG
0.7 BPG
49.1% FG (avg 11.3 attempts per)
40.7% 3PT (avg 7.5 attempts per)
77.3% FT (avg 3.3 attempts per)
65.5% TS%
32.8 MPG






Sleepyazn
Sophomore
Posts: 233
And1: 55
Joined: Jul 01, 2017
   

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#976 » by Sleepyazn » Sat Jul 15, 2017 8:07 pm

mirotic wants 18million a year, stop dreaming about him
User avatar
TheBrooklynKidd
Head Coach
Posts: 7,208
And1: 3,726
Joined: Jul 31, 2013
     

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#977 » by TheBrooklynKidd » Sat Jul 15, 2017 8:33 pm

Sleepyazn wrote:mirotic wants 18million a year, stop dreaming about him


He'll never get it. I'm pretty sure there's only like one team that even has space left to offer him 18 mill and its the Bulls :lol:
Ror1997
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 911
Joined: Jun 30, 2014

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#978 » by Ror1997 » Sat Jul 15, 2017 10:42 pm

Sleepyazn wrote:mirotic wants 18million a year, stop dreaming about him



Doesn't mean he'll get it.
RevolDas
Sophomore
Posts: 113
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 17, 2015
   

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#979 » by RevolDas » Sat Jul 15, 2017 10:44 pm

Lurker for awhile, first time poster here.

I'm somewhat satisfied with what we have now. If the only thing Marks does is to sign a few vet to 1 year deal I'm okay with. Of course if Marks can do some more magic and achieve more that would be even better. But to me the 3 goals must be equally weighted:

1. Win as much as we can
2. Develop the future core (DRuss, Levert)
3. Without hindering next year's cap

Having the 3 main goals in mind, what possible targets for us at this point?
Ror1997
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 911
Joined: Jun 30, 2014

Re: 2017 Nets Offseason Thread III 

Post#980 » by Ror1997 » Sat Jul 15, 2017 10:57 pm

RevolDas wrote:Lurker for awhile, first time poster here.

I'm somewhat satisfied with what we have now. If the only thing Marks does is to sign a few vet to 1 year deal I'm okay with. Of course if Marks can do some more magic and achieve more that would be even better. But to me the 3 goals must be equally weighted:

1. Win as much as we can
2. Develop the future core (DRuss, Levert)
3. Without hindering next year's cap

Having the 3 main goals in mind, what possible targets for us at this point?


Sign Mirotic or Green to strengthen the front court. Neither of them will break the bank, but are positive editions to the team.

Not sure what targets we have trade wise. Those 2 are the only guys I can think of FA wise that meet those goals.

Return to Brooklyn Nets