Maul Merchant wrote:By strong-arming the Cavs to give horrendous contracts to clients of his agency?
First, Cavs had very limited options of improving their roster because of a bloated payroll and having mediocre players on immovable contracts. Now, one of the reasons mentioned about Kyrie's request was that he didn't like what the roster would look like when/if LeBron leaves in 2018 - he most likely meant Thompson and Smith, who will still be on the books for another 2 years and $66 million then.
IF LeBron would actually prefer to stay in Cleveland, his constant game of non-commitment and creating leverages to get what he wants for himself kind of backfired.
He may have. Interestingly enough, he and Chris Paul (VP and President of the Players' Union at the time) also lobbied the NBAPA to support a 1-year cap spike over smoothing, and we all know what happened as a result of that.
