Welcome back Big Sauce!

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
carey wrote:It is 2-time, every time.
jcsunsfan wrote:bwgood77 wrote:dantley4prez wrote:We all had high hopes for Brandon Knight. Maybe we didn't all like the deal, but he was 23 and he was shooting 40% from 3 for Milwaukee. I'm not the only one who thought it was a good deal. I can't be the only one who was excited about BK's potential.
Now we may trade unprotected picks for another 40% shooter who's 25, who plays similarly to Brandon Knight, albeit at a much higher level.
Lets learn a lesson and trade protected picks only.
NBA Fiend wrote:Said Cleveland basically said no way without Jackson but Suns will still keeps lines open. Cleveland said they want a blue chip prospect and since he mentioned Minny some are connecting Wiggins. Don't tinier hiw that will work now that they signed Teague
LukasBMW wrote:If the Lakers win the lottery next year then the BK trade could go down as one of the worst in NBA history.
NBA HISTORY!
Think about that .
dantley4prez wrote:Kerrsed wrote:
If Ulis gets hurt......it's the Mike James show. Oh boy.
Kerrsed wrote:
NavLDO wrote:LukasBMW wrote:If the Lakers win the lottery next year then the BK trade could go down as one of the worst in NBA history.
NBA HISTORY!
Think about that .
Not even close...at least we got a halfway decent year out him...when we are talking worst trades of all time, I'm thinking, while we are on the subject of Irving, the unprotected pick that netted Kyrie, and Baron Davis, for Mo Williams, who gave them 74 'meh' games and only 24 starts, who was then traded for Lamar Odom...yeah, now THAT's bad! At least Knight was a rising star at the time and thought to be on an upward trajectory. Mo Williams was 28 and only hitting 27% of his 3s at the time...
...and then there's the Harden trade, Barkley trade, Joe Johnson trade (last two we benefitted from, of course), so Knight doesn't come close, in my eyes. Shoot, the Dragic trade looks worse, IMO. Dragic may be better, but those two picks may be worth more than the one...you never know...
bwgood77 wrote:NBA Fiend wrote:Said Cleveland basically said no way without Jackson but Suns will still keeps lines open. Cleveland said they want a blue chip prospect and since he mentioned Minny some are connecting Wiggins. Don't tinier hiw that will work now that they signed Teague
I won't be surprised if Cleveland waits until December and tries to do a Wiggins/Teague for Kyrie swap, or even pushes for a George Hill/DeAaron Fox package if the Kings are really interested.
bwgood77 wrote:dantley4prez wrote:Kerrsed wrote:
If Ulis gets hurt......it's the Mike James show. Oh boy.
Why not Bledsoe? And what does that have to do with Kendall Marshall? And why is Kendall Marshall a fan of Kerrsed? And the biggest question, why would Kerrsed put his name next to Justin Bieber?
bwgood77 wrote:jcsunsfan wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Now we may trade unprotected picks for another 40% shooter who's 25, who plays similarly to Brandon Knight, albeit at a much higher level.
Lets learn a lesson and trade protected picks only.
I agree. If we don't trade Jackson, I imagine they will want picks, and they will really want our pick for next year without protection, because they will want one of those top guys. I can't see Chriss, Bender or Warren being guys they think our their "blue chippers" in a Kyrie deal. It would probably be more than one pick as well...maybe 2018 and 2020.
NavLDO wrote:LukasBMW wrote:If the Lakers win the lottery next year then the BK trade could go down as one of the worst in NBA history.
NBA HISTORY!
Think about that .
Not even close...at least we got a halfway decent year out him...when we are talking worst trades of all time, I'm thinking, while we are on the subject of Irving, the unprotected pick that netted Kyrie, and Baron Davis, for Mo Williams, who gave them 74 'meh' games and only 24 starts, who was then traded for Lamar Odom...yeah, now THAT's bad! At least Knight was a rising star at the time and thought to be on an upward trajectory. Mo Williams was 28 and only hitting 27% of his 3s at the time...
...and then there's the Harden trade, Barkley trade, Joe Johnson trade (last two we benefitted from, of course), so Knight doesn't come close, in my eyes. Shoot, the Dragic trade looks worse, IMO. Dragic may be better, but those two picks may be worth more than the one...you never know...
bwgood77 wrote:dantley4prez wrote:Kerrsed wrote:
If Ulis gets hurt......it's the Mike James show. Oh boy.
Why not Bledsoe? And what does that have to do with Kendall Marshall? And why is Kendall Marshall a fan of Kerrsed? And the biggest question, why would Kerrsed put his name next to Justin Bieber?
bwgood77 wrote:NavLDO wrote:LukasBMW wrote:If the Lakers win the lottery next year then the BK trade could go down as one of the worst in NBA history.
NBA HISTORY!
Think about that .
Not even close...at least we got a halfway decent year out him...when we are talking worst trades of all time, I'm thinking, while we are on the subject of Irving, the unprotected pick that netted Kyrie, and Baron Davis, for Mo Williams, who gave them 74 'meh' games and only 24 starts, who was then traded for Lamar Odom...yeah, now THAT's bad! At least Knight was a rising star at the time and thought to be on an upward trajectory. Mo Williams was 28 and only hitting 27% of his 3s at the time...
...and then there's the Harden trade, Barkley trade, Joe Johnson trade (last two we benefitted from, of course), so Knight doesn't come close, in my eyes. Shoot, the Dragic trade looks worse, IMO. Dragic may be better, but those two picks may be worth more than the one...you never know...
It's too early to judge. It's really bad, but if it's a pick that ends up being a superstar, it will be up there.