NoLayupRule wrote:louieOrr wrote:NoLayupRule wrote:How do you continue to. It get it?
He wants to stay here because he loves NYC
He wants to stay here because his kid lives here, has a life here, goes to school here
He doesn't want to uproot his life because the team that committed to him has failed and changed its course.
He's not collecting a check.
And if he was there wouldn't be anything wrong with doing so
Quit the bs
That's all fine and good then. Were going to look at this from a perspective like this is a regular job. The reasoning sited here is not basketball related.
Assuming these are his priorities at this point, he should be cool to do what is asked of him by his employer correct?
He still gets to stay in the city he loves.
He doesn't have to uproot his child, or if that is not an option due to LALA he doesn't have to be away from his child.
If his child is the first priority, I certainly don't disagree with that.
But that goes out the window if he gets to play with his buddies in HOU?
IM calling BS
for starters you can't look at it like a regular job because its one in the public eye, celebrity based, and his "brand" is his person
But to us a "regular job" analogy were talking about a job where your employers told you they were building the company around you and gave you a contract of the kind that would keep you from going to a competitor. To sweeten the pot they told you they couldn't break the contract, only you could. and then after a couple years they started badmouthing you around town and talked about your flaws as a professional. then they decided to move you and your contract. But you didn't want to go. So you said no. then a couple of your friends joined up and a rival company and you said ok, thats one place I'm willing to go to. not that you want to go but you will allow that one destination.
sorry, but thats not unreasonable
its lame for us as fans because we want to move Melo to a place thats gonna benefit this team
but its not melos fault
its the teams fault. all day long.
be pissed at Jackson
ehhh... it can't be that simple because the ceo of the company brought you in on an impulse over the misgivings of a different management team. the core issue with the ceo is, although he has oodles of $$$, he has no clue or care as to price versus value, and this is easily glossed over because his product still makes $$$ for him. since that time the ceo has changed management teams at least twice, but the core flaw in the company history with you remains what they had been willing to give you with not much thought as to price versus value. and you yourself have only cared about your price with not much thought to your own value. you are a success in the former but the latter? best leave that alone, since that involves another type of success: winning.
all of which is fine...
until the latest management team brings this core issue to the forefront of their negotiations.