WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2)

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#1 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:28 pm

Continuation from viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1610042

Also, quit it with the insults. If you guys can't discuss this cordially, you won't be discussing it on the GB at all. Keep it civil.
Seabass11
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,680
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 11, 2017
     

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#2 » by Seabass11 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:31 pm

BadWolf wrote:Do you really think Cavs didn't look into IT's medical documentation, scans, rehab progress and everything before the trade?

Do teams have access to this info on players from other teams? I would think the only info they have on a player's health is what the opposing team gives them...hence the very common practice of including a physical of their own in the conditions of the trade.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#3 » by MotownMadness » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:32 pm

When is the deadline on this deal?
User avatar
INKtastic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 23,259
And1: 5,027
Joined: May 26, 2003
Location: Ohio
Contact:
     

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#4 » by INKtastic » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:33 pm

BadWolf wrote:
INKtastic wrote:
BadWolf wrote:Do you really think Cavs didn't look into IT's medical documentation, scans, rehab progress and everything before the trade?


They have a new scan from the 25th that provides more accurate information than anything that was available prior.


Sure, but accusing Celtics of withholding information is weird, i'm sure Cavs looked thoroughly into all the medical data available before agreeing to a trade. And I'm just as sure danny knew they'd do additional tests and scans at the physical.


I don't think they are accusing the Celtics of withholding information, they probably are eventually asking for additional compensation to account for the new information.

If they take the trade as is, they get back less than they expected. If they reject the trade, the Celtics get back less than they thought they sent out. Accepting or rejecting the trade isn't going to change the MRI results from Friday. Both sides should be motivated to make an adjustment to the trade to take that into account.
http://www.inktastic.com/ Custom T-Shirts and more
Sactowndog
Kings Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 4,455
And1: 1,817
Joined: May 27, 2017

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#5 » by Sactowndog » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:33 pm

@karkinos FWIW I am color blind. I assume green font equals sarcasm?
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,324
And1: 61,641
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: ▼VII▲VIII
         

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#6 » by Froob » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:34 pm

MotownMadness wrote:When is the deadline on this deal?

Wednesday. Hopefully the Cavs aren't sitting on their hands and are communicating with Boston if they aren't doing it as is because that's what it looks like.
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
User avatar
John Murdoch
RealGM
Posts: 10,249
And1: 7,719
Joined: Sep 16, 2013
         

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#7 » by John Murdoch » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:35 pm

Give up Rozier and lets move on
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
User avatar
INKtastic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 23,259
And1: 5,027
Joined: May 26, 2003
Location: Ohio
Contact:
     

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#8 » by INKtastic » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:35 pm

Froob wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:When is the deadline on this deal?

Wednesday. Hopefully the Cavs aren't sitting on their hands and are communicating with Boston if they aren't doing it as is because that's what it looks like.


no, it's 10 AM Thursday. From NBA.com

The deadline for all players involved in the trade to pass physicals is on Thursday, but it can be extended with mutual agreement by both teams, according to Wojnarowski.


http://www.nba.com/article/2017/08/26/report-cleveland-cavaliers-seek-further-compensation-after-isaiah-thomas
http://www.inktastic.com/ Custom T-Shirts and more
ballbrah
Junior
Posts: 402
And1: 1,007
Joined: Oct 15, 2013
Contact:
 

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#9 » by ballbrah » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:35 pm

Let's get this deal done already! I wonder if Cle could make it a 3 way and flip IT and a pick to the Suns for Bledsoe?
Image
http://www.havejerseys.com - Home to your favorite Throwback & Movie Jerseys! Always high quality, always low prices :nod:
thatzidimitriou
Junior
Posts: 381
And1: 45
Joined: May 19, 2012

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#10 » by thatzidimitriou » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:35 pm

Is there a time limit that this trade has to be accepted or voided?

Sent from my SM-G955U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Fantaxp7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,662
And1: 3,794
Joined: Aug 05, 2010
Location: Boston

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#11 » by Fantaxp7 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:36 pm

The more I think about it I bet Ainge is having deja vu from Rondo. Attempted to have him come back after that ACL surgery to evaluate him and see if he ups his value.

Ainge probably doesn't want to take a chance that IT won't be 100% ever again and his trade value once the season starts or whenever he comes back will be much lower.
BadWolf
General Manager
Posts: 8,931
And1: 3,428
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#12 » by BadWolf » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:37 pm

INKtastic wrote:
BadWolf wrote:
INKtastic wrote:
They have a new scan from the 25th that provides more accurate information than anything that was available prior.


Sure, but accusing Celtics of withholding information is weird, i'm sure Cavs looked thoroughly into all the medical data available before agreeing to a trade. And I'm just as sure danny knew they'd do additional tests and scans at the physical.


I don't think they are accusing the Celtics of withholding information, they probably are eventually asking for additional compensation to account for the new information.

If they take the trade as is, they get back less than they expected. If they reject the trade, the Celtics get back less than they thought they sent out. Accepting or rejecting the trade isn't going to change the MRI results from Friday. Both sides should be motivated to make an adjustment to the trade to take that into account.


Cavs might not, but that's a hot topic here.
And jbk1234, i really don't know what you're talking about. You seem to think it's weird that Danny didn't ask them to void the physical? Maybe i just don't understand.

i really don't care whether this trade goes through or not, but thought it was an overpay at the time. The package with injured IT is still better then that Bucks package and could be much better if that pick gets really high.
karkinos
Head Coach
Posts: 6,285
And1: 2,060
Joined: Nov 06, 2009

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#13 » by karkinos » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:37 pm

Sactowndog wrote:@karkinos FWIW I am color blind. I assume green font equals sarcasm?

yup
i figured as much
JJ_PR
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,259
And1: 3,972
Joined: Mar 19, 2015
Location: Puerto Rico
   

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#14 » by JJ_PR » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:38 pm

I don't know why there's so much discussion regarding the subject. Simply put, the cavs thought they where getting Isaiah Thomas, Jae Crowder, Ante Zizic and the Brooklyn pick. Instead, they're getting Jae Crowder, Ante Zizic, the Brooklyn pick and a 7m expiring contract. Seems to me like Ainge tried to fleece his way into a star, like he does in all his trades. Bummer.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,309
And1: 69,927
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#15 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:38 pm

John Murdoch wrote:Give up Rozier and lets move on

No. Nothing. Just man up and rescind the deal
BadWolf
General Manager
Posts: 8,931
And1: 3,428
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#16 » by BadWolf » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:39 pm

Seabass11 wrote:
BadWolf wrote:Do you really think Cavs didn't look into IT's medical documentation, scans, rehab progress and everything before the trade?

Do teams have access to this info on players from other teams? I would think the only info they have on a player's health is what the opposing team gives them...hence the very common practice of including a physical of their own in the conditions of the trade.


No idea really, but seems logical they do.
Would you agree to trade for an injured guy before seeing the documentation?
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,846
And1: 70,144
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#17 » by clyde21 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:40 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
John Murdoch wrote:Give up Rozier and lets move on

No. Nothing. Just man up and rescind the deal


Well, that would be kind of awkward.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
Fantaxp7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,662
And1: 3,794
Joined: Aug 05, 2010
Location: Boston

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#18 » by Fantaxp7 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:41 pm

BadWolf wrote:
Seabass11 wrote:
BadWolf wrote:Do you really think Cavs didn't look into IT's medical documentation, scans, rehab progress and everything before the trade?

Do teams have access to this info on players from other teams? I would think the only info they have on a player's health is what the opposing team gives them...hence the very common practice of including a physical of their own in the conditions of the trade.


No idea really, but seems logical they do.
Would you agree to trade for an injured guy before seeing the documentation?


New business idea: PlayerFax
User avatar
INKtastic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 23,259
And1: 5,027
Joined: May 26, 2003
Location: Ohio
Contact:
     

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#19 » by INKtastic » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:41 pm

BadWolf wrote:
INKtastic wrote:
BadWolf wrote:
Sure, but accusing Celtics of withholding information is weird, i'm sure Cavs looked thoroughly into all the medical data available before agreeing to a trade. And I'm just as sure danny knew they'd do additional tests and scans at the physical.


I don't think they are accusing the Celtics of withholding information, they probably are eventually asking for additional compensation to account for the new information.

If they take the trade as is, they get back less than they expected. If they reject the trade, the Celtics get back less than they thought they sent out. Accepting or rejecting the trade isn't going to change the MRI results from Friday. Both sides should be motivated to make an adjustment to the trade to take that into account.


Cavs might not, but that's a hot topic here.
And jbk1234, i really don't know what you're talking about. You seem to think it's weird that Danny didn't ask them to void the physical? Maybe i just don't understand.

i really don't care whether this trade goes through or not, but thought it was an overpay at the time. The package with injured IT is still better then that Bucks package and could be much better if that pick gets really high.


Celtics got the best player in the trade, 2nd best player in the trade is now worth less than thought. The amount less is unknown.

And I don't know why jbk1234 keeps bringing it up either, there's no way the Cavs would have done a trade without being allowed to do their own physical. I can't think of any time that's even happened (aside from possibly a case where the traded player was going to be waived).
http://www.inktastic.com/ Custom T-Shirts and more
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,309
And1: 69,927
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: WojBomb: BOS/CLE deal could be voided after IT's physical (Part 2) 

Post#20 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:41 pm

JJ_PR wrote:I don't know why there's so much discussion regarding the subject. Simply put, the cavs thought they where getting Isaiah Thomas, Jae Crowder, Ante Zizic and the Brooklyn pick. Instead, they're getting Jae Crowder, Ante Zizic, the Brooklyn pick and a 7m expiring contract. Seems to me like Ainge tried to fleece his way into a star, like he does in all his trades. Bummer.

Ainge added the Brooklyn pick as compensation for IT being hurt. Cavs agreed. Now Cavs are having 2nd thoughts.

Cavs need to put their big boy pants on and either accept or decline the trade as it is presently.

Return to The General Board