malik959 wrote:Jay10 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:you quoted the wrong guy
i don't think we picked him because he came from a good family. i think it's because of the triangle. and i will not dispute that he does have potential and talent, but i think the triangle was the #1 factor in this pick
I get a laugh every time someone says "he was drafted for the triangle" and now that phil isn't there he's a horrible fit.
triangle offense = fundamental basketball; team ball
DSJr. and Monk are all about getting theirs.
Why this is so difficult to understand is beyond me.
Yeah I don't get it either. It kind of reminds me of all the Justice Winslow arguments. Winslow was the best defender in that draft and we all knew it and teams were drooling over that alone. The same goes for Frank. His defense is off the chain, but unlike Winslow, his handles and shot are also on point. For Frank I believe it'll be more of can he run the offense or do we move him to two. I can see lineups with Jack, Frank, and THJ. For people to say he was chosen for the triangle that's actually a good thing for if you can run the triangle then hell you can run just about any offense.
Winning and smart basketball is not for everyone. As stated, dsjr and monk are about getting theirs. Knicks tried that route with amare, then melo.
Let's not bring in **** like that anymore. I want the knicks to win, not do worse like they have been.





































