Greed wrote:You mean an old, past-their-prime Celtics team who hadn't won a championship in years? (Basically the same as what Jordan did with the Pistons, except the Pistons core was younger when Jordan was going up against them)
You're forgetting quite a few things. That "old, past-their-prime" Celtics team still made it to the Eastern Conference Finals as a 4th seed. The narrative at the time was that those Celtics were comprised of composed savvy veterans that knew how to win. The Heat, on the other hand, had just lost Chris Bosh for the ECF series due to injury. Dwyane Wade was also playing injured. So that left LeBron James versus Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, Ray Allen and Rajon Rondo.
And when those Celtics went up 3-1 nobody was saying that they were old and past their prime. That only came out of critics' mouths
after LeBron ripped their hearts out.
You're also wrong about the Pistons comparison because Isaiah Thomas was playing injured for most of the end of that season. His injury was well covered at the time and many predicted that the Pistons reign was going to end because of it, even long before the playoffs began. This is what was written in a newspaper about Thomas' injury in
January of 1991:
Their (The Pistons) chances of winning the Eastern Conference championship - or even the Central Division title - may have vanished the instant the announcement was made that Thomas would be reporting to sick bay instead of the scorer's table for the next three months.
So the 1991 Jordan/Pippen/Grant Bulls faced a hobbled Pistons in the ECF. And the 2012 Garnett/Pierce/Allen Celtics faced a hobbled Heat in the ECF. The difference between Jordan and LeBron here is obvious.
Greed wrote:See above. You mean those geriatric Spurs with Tim and Manu being 36 and 35 respectively? How exactly do you reconcile this with the criticisms against Jordan against the Pistons?
Those "geriatric" Spurs that lost to LeBron were the #1 seed in the West (62 wins) the very next season, and then they won the NBA title. I.e. LeBron beat that Spurs team when they were still championship quality. They didn't play like geriatrics.
The Pistons that Jordan beat in 1991 were in no way on the level of either the 2013 San Antonio Spurs (whom LeBron beat in the Finals) or the 2014 San Antonio Spurs (whom LeBron didn't beat in the Finals).
Greed wrote:But he lost against a team that only won 67 games the very next season, 4-1. Why's that?
Well, obviously because Golden State added Kevin Durant and because LeBron's #2 and #3 were still notoriously bad defensive players that often need to be taken out of the game because they are so bad on defense. In other words, the addition of KD to Golden State made up for everything that LeBron had been doing to make up for the fact that he wasn't playing with good defensive teammates.
This is why the addition of Crowder (and to a lesser extent Jeff Green) was so important to Cleveland.
Greed wrote:Actually, as shown above, Jordan had very similar situations in his championship career. See Pistons/Celtics.
Jordan never beat the Bird/McHale/Parrish Celtics in the playoffs. He only got swept by them. And, as I mentioned above, in 1991 the Pistons were playing with an injured Isaiah Thomas who missed several months of that season. Those are poor examples.