ImageImageImage

An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

7r5ur
RealGM
Posts: 11,949
And1: 5,080
Joined: Feb 26, 2005

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#61 » by 7r5ur » Fri Nov 3, 2017 5:30 am

Blkbrd671 wrote:
BDM22 wrote:
hoophabit wrote:I can't believe people are peeing their pants over this, and I'm a big Kennard fan? They're 5-3 and 1st in the Central following an early west coast trip? If the team were struggling rather than contending, and Kennard was getting no look, okay, why not? I suppose all I'm saying is that it's kind of jumping the gun at this point.

Oh we've seen this story. See: Ellenson, Henry. It's not an anomaly it's a pattern.

If you drafted a guy in the lottery and you can't even dress them despite a solid decade of losing, you probably drafted the wrong guy.

Either Stan is a bad drafter or he's bad a developing talent.

Stanley should be way better than he is. Henry hasn't done anything. Luke is on pace to be a non-factor for the foreseeable future given the roster with Bradley/Galloway. That's 3 first round picks (2 in the lottery). You could probably land a Jimmy Butler/Paul George type of deal with 3 first rounders. It's just a waste.


WTH

you guys are under-estimating the leap that every player has to take from college to pro's. and that for majority of players drafted, that leap is made by very few players in their first and 2nd years, and even through their rookie contract.

Hindsights 20/20

You guys are severely overreacting to our draft picks. This isn't 2K, in reality players need development.

Wait... isn't that exactly what we're saying?

Or are you one of those who believes players become experienced vets by sitting in street clothes?

You dress them. You play them in most games, even if it's just a few minutes. A season of DNP's just means he comes in next year looking like a 22 year old rookie (See Henry this year), and Stan won't want to play him then either.

We're talking about a lotto pick who isn't some raw 19 year old, and he's sitting because of Reggie Bullock, who has never even managed to become a consistent member of a rotation in his career.
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#62 » by Blkbrd671 » Fri Nov 3, 2017 5:41 am

BDM22 wrote:Wait... isn't that exactly what we're saying?

Or are you one of those who believes players become experienced vets by sitting in street clothes?


If he can't even out play RB and LG , then f* yes he needs to be sitting his a* on the bench. You guys act like LK is already a allstar and SVG just choosing not to play him.

You do realize SVG and assistant coaches see him every day in practice??

We've been through 8 games and you guys already acting like LK's going to be a bust because SVG's not force feeding him minutes at the determent to the team . I simply can't agree with that.

Another way to develop is to realize that your not playing well enough to even beat out the back ups so you need to step your sh* up. In reality this has more to do with LK's learning curve

You dress them. You play them in most games, even if it's just a few minutes. A season of DNP's just means he comes in next year looking like a 22 year old rookie (See Henry this year), and Stan won't want to play him then either.

We're talking about a lotto pick who isn't some raw 19 year old, and he's sitting because of Reggie Bullock, who has never even managed to become a consistent member of a rotation in his career.


He's sitting him because LK hasn't out performed RB. and defensively RB brings way more with his length and versatility. aGain dressing lotto picks, "because he's a lotto pick", makes absolutely no sense in realm of reality.
7r5ur
RealGM
Posts: 11,949
And1: 5,080
Joined: Feb 26, 2005

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#63 » by 7r5ur » Fri Nov 3, 2017 5:51 am

Blkbrd671 wrote:
BDM22 wrote:Wait... isn't that exactly what we're saying?

Or are you one of those who believes players become experienced vets by sitting in street clothes?


If he can't even out play RB and LG , then f* yes he needs to be sitting his a* on the bench. You guys act like LK is already a allstar and SVG just choosing not to play him.

You do realize SVG and assistant coaches see him every day in practice??

We've been through 8 games and you guys already acting like LK's going to be a bust because SVG's not force feeding him minutes at the determent to the team . I simply can't agree with that.

Another way to develop is to realize that your not playing well enough to even beat out the back ups so you need to step your sh* up. In reality this has more to do with LK's learning curve

You dress them. You play them in most games, even if it's just a few minutes. A season of DNP's just means he comes in next year looking like a 22 year old rookie (See Henry this year), and Stan won't want to play him then either.

We're talking about a lotto pick who isn't some raw 19 year old, and he's sitting because of Reggie Bullock, who has never even managed to become a consistent member of a rotation in his career.


He's sitting him because LK hasn't out performed RB. and defensively RB brings way more with his length and versatility. aGain dressing lotto picks, "because he's a lotto pick", makes absolutely no sense in realm of reality.


Ahh gotcha, so you're saying LK has to be an "all-star" to outplay 22% shooting Reggie Bullock. That ain't struggling though. He's a vet!

Or the steady dose of Leuer we're getting while Tolliver's role is sporadic.

But sure, Stan's rotations are all merit-based. Leuer's probably dominating in practice :lol:
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#64 » by Blkbrd671 » Fri Nov 3, 2017 6:11 am

BDM22 wrote:
Blkbrd671 wrote:
BDM22 wrote:Wait... isn't that exactly what we're saying?

Or are you one of those who believes players become experienced vets by sitting in street clothes?


If he can't even out play RB and LG , then f* yes he needs to be sitting his a* on the bench. You guys act like LK is already a allstar and SVG just choosing not to play him.

You do realize SVG and assistant coaches see him every day in practice??

We've been through 8 games and you guys already acting like LK's going to be a bust because SVG's not force feeding him minutes at the determent to the team . I simply can't agree with that.

Another way to develop is to realize that your not playing well enough to even beat out the back ups so you need to step your sh* up. In reality this has more to do with LK's learning curve

You dress them. You play them in most games, even if it's just a few minutes. A season of DNP's just means he comes in next year looking like a 22 year old rookie (See Henry this year), and Stan won't want to play him then either.

We're talking about a lotto pick who isn't some raw 19 year old, and he's sitting because of Reggie Bullock, who has never even managed to become a consistent member of a rotation in his career.


He's sitting him because LK hasn't out performed RB. and defensively RB brings way more with his length and versatility. aGain dressing lotto picks, "because he's a lotto pick", makes absolutely no sense in realm of reality.


Ahh gotcha, so you're saying LK has to be an "all-star" to outplay 22% shooting Reggie Bullock. That ain't struggling though. He's a vet!

Or the steady dose of Leuer we're getting while Tolliver's role is sporadic.

But sure, Stan's rotations are all merit-based. Leuer's probably dominating in practice :lol:


Don't change the goal post, we are discussing LK's minutes.


and it says more about LK's readiness than RB the fact he can't get minutes over a guy shooting 22%. Additionally you may want to use career numbers rather than cherry picking a small sample size of a player who just came off suspension.

You also continue to forget the other side of the ball, which probably has more to do with LK not playing. If you did watch him when he got minutes, teams were attacking him and doing it successfully. He got lost on several rotations etc. RB simply brings more to the table and has a larger body of work from the coaches to rely on .

again guys, this isn't 2K, this is real life where player development isn't just editing a players profile and increasing ratings.

LK needs to win his rotation spot in practive. Obviously he's not doing it to this point
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: RE: Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#65 » by Pharaoh » Fri Nov 3, 2017 8:24 am

BDM22 wrote:
You dress them. You play them in most games, even if it's just a few minutes.


Why?

What do you hope to gain in those minutes? What do you hope to learn? What do you hope Luke learns in those minutes?

A season of DNP's just means he comes in next year looking like a 22 year old rookie (See Henry this year), and Stan won't want to play him then either.


And SVG is aware of that so he's gonna have to learn from his mistakes with Henry & SJ here


Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
GreekAlex
Analyst
Posts: 3,201
And1: 1,815
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#66 » by GreekAlex » Sun Nov 5, 2017 6:18 am

Good news... Luke is going to log heavy minutes in his next game.

Him and Henrey are headed to Grand Rapids to play at 1pm tomorrow
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#67 » by ImHeisenberg » Sun Nov 5, 2017 5:50 pm

GreekAlex wrote:Good news... Luke is going to log heavy minutes in his next game.

Him and Henrey are headed to Grand Rapids to play at 1pm tomorrow

Really? Almost tempted to go check them out. But, the game starts in 10 minutes. It would be 45 minutes before I packed the wife and kids up and took them over there.
hoophabit
Analyst
Posts: 3,697
And1: 1,420
Joined: Jan 19, 2002
 

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#68 » by hoophabit » Sun Nov 5, 2017 8:42 pm

Young fellas represented well in the G league game:
http://gleague.nba.com/games/20171105/RAPGRD/
User avatar
whitehops
General Manager
Posts: 8,300
And1: 7,003
Joined: Dec 12, 2012
Location: Toronto
     

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#69 » by whitehops » Sun Nov 5, 2017 8:51 pm

not too much on this highlight because he went to the line 11 times, scored 26 points:

User avatar
engelbert321
Head Coach
Posts: 7,396
And1: 1,463
Joined: Jul 24, 2011
 

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#70 » by engelbert321 » Sun Nov 5, 2017 9:09 pm

whitehops wrote:not too much on this highlight because he went to the line 11 times, scored 26 points:


Encouraging
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#71 » by Pharaoh » Sun Nov 5, 2017 9:13 pm

Best place for Luke atm

LG has earnt minutes and SVG is gonna give Bullock every opportunity to get himself into gear

Henry playing in the G League is a insult and just further illustrates SVG is full of ****!

Less than a week ago SVG sits there and says Henry has earnt the right to play, he's done "everything" they've asked him to do...

Next thing you know he's getting splinters on his arse?

The more things change the more they stay the same with SVG

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
vic
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 1,101
Joined: Dec 27, 2012

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#72 » by vic » Sun Nov 5, 2017 9:23 pm

SVG is finally prioritizing defense, instead of just talking about it... so now he's getting wins. I ain't mad at him.

You can only have so many ball-handlers/dribblers on the court before they become redundant. When you want to win you have to put more defenders on the court.

That's why Galloway, bullock, and Tolliver, and Moreland are playing, plain and simple. And they are winning, and I'm not complaining
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
User avatar
GreekAlex
Analyst
Posts: 3,201
And1: 1,815
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#73 » by GreekAlex » Sun Nov 5, 2017 9:29 pm

Pharaoh wrote:Best place for Luke atm



Henry playing in the G League is a insult and just further illustrates SVG is full of ****!


Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


Did you run out of green ink?

Henry has been better on Defense this season but still gets abused on a regular basis.

Tolliver isn't a long term solution but the team clearly plays better with him rather than Henry.

They just have a different energy and as much as I like to see the young guys develop it's about wins right now to cement this new culture.

The Kennard over Bullock is a better argument at this point.

Who's minutes do you suggest Henry should get, Tolliver or Moreland?
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: RE: Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#74 » by Pharaoh » Sun Nov 5, 2017 9:37 pm

GreekAlex wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:Best place for Luke atm



Henry playing in the G League is a insult and just further illustrates SVG is full of ****!


Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


Did you run out of green ink?

Henry has been better on Defense this season but still gets abused on a regular basis.

Tolliver isn't a long term solution but the team clearly plays better with him rather than Henry.

They just have a different energy and as much as I like to see the young guys develop it's about wins right now to cement this new culture.

The Kennard over Bullock is a better argument at this point.


Green font? I'm not being sarcastic!

Tolliver should be the first big off the bench...

He should shift to the 5 when Henry comes on. Moreland (& Jon & Bobo) is there if Henry gets abused

The same people wanting Luke to play for his development surely have to think Henry deserves to play too?

Or is it a case of "shiny new toy"?

Fact is SVG is full of it and the curious case of Henry is further evidence.

IF he's earnt the right to play

IF he's done everything you've asked

Then why does he get yanked or sat so quickly?

To win? In November? For defense? Who else is getting yanked for poor D?

SVG talks a lot of rubbish - it's been proven that he's full of it, practices double standards and plays favourites.

I'm guessing he's honest with these guys once the cameras and mics aren't around cause otherwise he'd have already lost the vast majority of this roster



Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
GreekAlex
Analyst
Posts: 3,201
And1: 1,815
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: RE: Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#75 » by GreekAlex » Sun Nov 5, 2017 10:00 pm

Pharaoh wrote:
GreekAlex wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:Best place for Luke atm



Henry playing in the G League is a insult and just further illustrates SVG is full of ****!


Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


Did you run out of green ink?

Henry has been better on Defense this season but still gets abused on a regular basis.

Tolliver isn't a long term solution but the team clearly plays better with him rather than Henry.

They just have a different energy and as much as I like to see the young guys develop it's about wins right now to cement this new culture.

The Kennard over Bullock is a better argument at this point.


Green font? I'm not being sarcastic!

Tolliver should be the first big off the bench...

He should shift to the 5 when Henry comes on. Moreland (& Jon & Bobo) is there if Henry gets abused

The same people wanting Luke to play for his development surely have to think Henry deserves to play too?

Or is it a case of "shiny new toy"?

Fact is SVG is full of it and the curious case of Henry is further evidence.

IF he's earnt the right to play

IF he's done everything you've asked

Then why does he get yanked or sat so quickly?

To win? In November? For defense? Who else is getting yanked for poor D?

SVG talks a lot of rubbish - it's been proven that he's full of it, practices double standards and plays favourites.

I'm guessing he's honest with these guys once the cameras and mics aren't around cause otherwise he'd have already lost the vast majority of this roster



Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


I'm not sure how I feel about AT playing center.

In theory it sounds good but I like how the team plays with Andre & Moreland now that there are enough shooters for spacing.

Unless the other teams match ups dictate a small ball lineup, this teams seems better constructed to play with a traditional center to grab boards ard protect the paint.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#76 » by Pharaoh » Sun Nov 5, 2017 10:08 pm

GreekAlex wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:
GreekAlex wrote:
Did you run out of green ink?

Henry has been better on Defense this season but still gets abused on a regular basis.

Tolliver isn't a long term solution but the team clearly plays better with him rather than Henry.

They just have a different energy and as much as I like to see the young guys develop it's about wins right now to cement this new culture.

The Kennard over Bullock is a better argument at this point.


Green font? I'm not being sarcastic!

Tolliver should be the first big off the bench...

He should shift to the 5 when Henry comes on. Moreland (& Jon & Bobo) is there if Henry gets abused

The same people wanting Luke to play for his development surely have to think Henry deserves to play too?

Or is it a case of "shiny new toy"?

Fact is SVG is full of it and the curious case of Henry is further evidence.

IF he's earnt the right to play

IF he's done everything you've asked

Then why does he get yanked or sat so quickly?

To win? In November? For defense? Who else is getting yanked for poor D?

SVG talks a lot of rubbish - it's been proven that he's full of it, practices double standards and plays favourites.

I'm guessing he's honest with these guys once the cameras and mics aren't around cause otherwise he'd have already lost the vast majority of this roster



Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app


I'm not sure how I feel about AT playing center.

In theory it sounds good but I like how the team plays with Andre & Moreland now that there are enough shooters for spacing.

Unless the other teams match ups dictate a small ball lineup, this teams seems better constructed to play with a traditional center to grab boards ard protect the paint.

Yeah it depends on match ups but if SVG states Henry has earnt his minutes and done everything they've asked WHY isn't he getting consistent burn?

For defensive reasons? Who else has defensive issues? Are they on the choker chain too?

For those calling for Luke to play: are you also calling for Henry to play? Are you trashing SVG for BS about Henry?

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,262
And1: 9,749
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#77 » by tmorgan » Sun Nov 5, 2017 10:51 pm

I think the answer there is simple, and has been stated many times:

We're playing Bullock, who isn't playing well, over Kennard. Kennard should be the 5th guard in the rotation.

For bigs, because Ellenson isn't a defender and Leuer is passive, the only centers are Dre, Moreland, and Boban. Boban is nailed to the bench, one would assume because he's not playing well in practice or can't run the sets we want to run. Ellenson is therefore a 4, and the competition is Tobas (the obvious starter with SJ playing the 3), Leuer, and Tolliver. Leuer has stunk pretty bad, but Tolliver has been good. Tolliver is taking those minutes and playing well. Leuer may not have much of a role for a while, even when his ankle gets better.

There's simply a better replacement for Ellenson than Kennard right now. I'd like to see both, particularly in blowouts, but there haven't been many of those in either direction.
Liqourish
RealGM
Posts: 14,912
And1: 2,245
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
       

Re: An honest question for fans about Luke Kennard 

Post#78 » by Liqourish » Sun Nov 5, 2017 11:17 pm

I understand Galloway playing. I even understand Tolliver/Leuer playing when healthy. I don't understand playing Reggie Bullock. He doesn't play defense, he's horrible offensively. He should be glued to the bench. He adds nothing.

The thing that impresses me most about Kennard is his patience. He's not rushing to take errant shots. He's also actively engaged at all times. We don't know about his defense just yet but he has shown good hands.

My roster would be up to 11 deep depending on rotations and matchups:

R. Jackson 28/I. Smith 20
A. Bradley 32/L. Galloway 16/L. Kennard
S. Johnson 30/T. Harris 18/L. Kennard /H. Ellenson
T. Harris 15/A. Tolliver 20/H. Ellenson 13
A. Drummond 33/E. Moreland 15

Drummond 33
Tobias 33
Bradley 32
Johnson 30
Jackson 28
Ish 20
Tolliver 20
Galloway 16
Moreland 15
Ellenson 13
Kennard spot/matchup

If we moved Boban/Bullock/Leuer in a trade for even a draft pick or capspace to re-sign Bradley, I would love this roster.

Return to Detroit Pistons