ImageImage

We "Don't" Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread

Moderators: yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam

User avatar
countryboi
Head Coach
Posts: 7,352
And1: 1,492
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
   

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#281 » by countryboi » Fri Nov 3, 2017 2:31 pm

I dont think my expectations of Monk are unrealistic. The sky is the limit for this kid, right now i fully expect him to just give us flashes of his awesomeness but down the road he is going to be one of the best players in this league.
The Cut Podcast, An Hilarious barbershop style discussion podcast. Watch us on Youtube and listen to us on all major Podcast Platforms. https://linktr.ee/thecut_podcast
Hornet Mania
General Manager
Posts: 9,097
And1: 8,590
Joined: Jul 05, 2014
Location: Dornbirn, Austria
     

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#282 » by Hornet Mania » Fri Nov 3, 2017 3:53 pm

I'm still happy with the Monk pick, wouldn't take anyone picked after him just yet. It's still early, of course, but Monk's strength (outside shooting) has been a huge need for us year after year.

If he pans out then we can trot out two flame-throwers at guard and we'll be Blazers East, except we'd probably play better defense.
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,386
And1: 15,926
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#283 » by fatlever » Fri Nov 3, 2017 6:53 pm

Kuzma looks fantastic. He has to be a re-draft top 10 at this point, right?

either or (based on super-early impressions)

1) ball or fox?
2) smith jr or fultz?
3) josh jackson or isaac?
4) lauri or kuzma?
5) monk or mitchell?
6) j collins or bam?
7) bell or caleb?
8) bacon or brooks?
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#284 » by BigSlam » Fri Nov 3, 2017 7:04 pm

fatlever wrote:Kuzma looks fantastic. He has to be a re-draft top 10 at this point, right?

either or (based on super-early impressions)

1) ball or fox?
2) smith jr or fultz?
3) josh jackson or isaac?
4) lauri or kuzma?
5) monk or mitchell?
6) j collins or bam?
7) bell or caleb?
8) bacon or brooks?

No Tatum?

He’s been good.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,386
And1: 15,926
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#285 » by fatlever » Fri Nov 3, 2017 8:14 pm

i couldnt think of a like for like comp for Tatum from the rooks.

Here ya go, close enough

Tatum or jaylen?
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,293
And1: 45,933
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#286 » by JDR720 » Fri Nov 3, 2017 8:49 pm

Tatum will probably be what jabari was supposed to be. So Tatum.
User avatar
amcoolio
Hornets Forum John Hancock
Posts: 17,826
And1: 10,162
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
   

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#287 » by amcoolio » Fri Nov 3, 2017 8:58 pm

Tatum = Paul Pierce 2.0

F the Celtics and their luckiness
HoopsMalone
Veteran
Posts: 2,532
And1: 1,548
Joined: Aug 22, 2017

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#288 » by HoopsMalone » Mon Nov 6, 2017 3:11 am

Really impressed with Monk's playmaking skills thus far. Steph Curry 2.0
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#289 » by mrknowitall215 » Tue Nov 14, 2017 12:39 am

As much as I like Monk, I think it's time for Clifford to limit his minutes with the return of Batum. It pains me to say that Monk has been hurting the team

Amid the few bright sparks he's made in sporadic moments with his scoring ability he's actually been a heavily net-negative player for the team. Until Monk shows some consistency in the form of efficiency and improve his shot selection he should be limited to maybe 10-15 minutes per game
Image
User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#290 » by catch20two » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:31 am

Yea the on/off court ratings so far this season do Monk no favors. I still think the smart move will be to stagger Batum into the 2nd unit as the de facto PG to get Monk playing off the ball. I know some people are excited about what MCW may bring but he’s ultra trash that’ll only make our bench that much worse. We just need to shorten the rotation to 8-9 players barring a back-to-back and injuries.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,950
And1: 16,972
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#291 » by Liver_Pooty » Tue Nov 14, 2017 2:00 pm

mrknowitall215 wrote:As much as I like Monk, I think it's time for Clifford to limit his minutes with the return of Batum. It pains me to say that Monk has been hurting the team

Amid the few bright sparks he's made in sporadic moments with his scoring ability he's actually been a heavily net-negative player for the team. Until Monk shows some consistency in the form of efficiency and improve his shot selection he should be limited to maybe 10-15 minutes per game


Completely agree.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
Snidely FC
Head Coach
Posts: 6,354
And1: 3,635
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#292 » by Snidely FC » Tue Nov 14, 2017 2:01 pm

mrknowitall215 wrote:As much as I like Monk, I think it's time for Clifford to limit his minutes with the return of Batum. It pains me to say that Monk has been hurting the team

Amid the few bright sparks he's made in sporadic moments with his scoring ability he's actually been a heavily net-negative player for the team. Until Monk shows some consistency in the form of efficiency and improve his shot selection he should be limited to maybe 10-15 minutes per game

no doubt Monk has a sweet stroke that will lead to purple patch games, but at age 19 he may be several seasons away from consistency; agreed no playoff level team in the NBA ought to rely on such a callow player to be one of their high usage scorers
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,426
And1: 15,623
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#293 » by yosemiteben » Tue Nov 14, 2017 5:03 pm

I agree with MKIA. Will be interesting to see what our rotation looks like in March and how many minutes Monk gets.
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,386
And1: 15,926
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#294 » by fatlever » Tue Nov 14, 2017 6:19 pm

I won't shed a tear if Monk is dropped from the rotation all-together until he gets his **** together. He's been awful outside of about 3 quarters.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,612
And1: 14,303
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#295 » by HornetJail » Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:29 pm

fatlever wrote:I won't shed a tear if Monk is dropped from the rotation all-together until he gets his **** together. He's been awful outside of about 3 quarters.

I think most hot/cold players like him should be given about 4-5 minutes fairly early on in each half and fire a few shots off just to test whether he's hot or not. I'd be pretty disappointed if he fell out of the rotation but I think he should have a shorter leash. When he's cold, he shouldn't be given the minutes to go 1-10. This is how I felt about Marco, Troy, Tolliver etc
investigate Adam Silver
Hornet Mania
General Manager
Posts: 9,097
And1: 8,590
Joined: Jul 05, 2014
Location: Dornbirn, Austria
     

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#296 » by Hornet Mania » Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:57 pm

He's going to look a lot better with the ball out of his hands, imo. Right now it seems like as a backup PG he enters a lot of possessions already having decided whether to pass or shoot before even probing the defense. It's not uncommon to see him pass up a wide-open look just to force a pass one possession, only to jack up a shot with a hand in his face early in the shot clock shortly thereafter.

He needs to be a complementary player until he learns how to read NBA defenses, he will be much more effective as a role player whose decision to pass/shoot is already clear by the time he gets the ball. More open looks will also only help his shooting in general, as buckets seem to snowball for that sort of player.

I'm relatively happy with the flashes Monk has shown considering he's still a teenager, I really like how his confidence has not wavered, but he has also proven he's not yet ready to be a decision-maker. If we let him be a role player for a bit it's going to make him better down the road, jumping between backup PG and SG was a lot to ask right away.
HoopsMalone
Veteran
Posts: 2,532
And1: 1,548
Joined: Aug 22, 2017

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#297 » by HoopsMalone » Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:37 pm

Hornet Mania wrote:He's going to look a lot better with the ball out of his hands, imo. Right now it seems like as a backup PG he enters a lot of possessions already having decided whether to pass or shoot before even probing the defense. It's not uncommon to see him pass up a wide-open look just to force a pass one possession, only to jack up a shot with a hand in his face early in the shot clock shortly thereafter.

He needs to be a complementary player until he learns how to read NBA defenses, he will be much more effective as a role player whose decision to pass/shoot is already clear by the time he gets the ball. More open looks will also only help his shooting in general, as buckets seem to snowball for that sort of player.

I'm relatively happy with the flashes Monk has shown considering he's still a teenager, I really like how his confidence has not wavered, but he has also proven he's not yet ready to be a decision-maker. If we let him be a role player for a bit it's going to make him better down the road, jumping between backup PG and SG was a lot to ask right away.



This is why I wanted to see him in the starting lineup. Dwight could have helped offset all the mistakes he makes defensively. Additionally, kemba takes away all the ballhandling responsibilities so he can just worry about spotting up and maybe some secondary playmaking. The problem is that gives no one for kemba to hide on defensively, im sure thats clifford's resistance to the idea. And with batum, mcw, and stone all out backup PG was a legitimate concern. I don't know why we targeted such an obvious injury prone backup PG when it was such a position of concern.

I think Lamb would have handled the primary playmaking role on the 2nd unit just fine though
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,426
And1: 15,623
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#298 » by yosemiteben » Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:15 pm

Agree with all that Hornet Mania.
Hornet Mania
General Manager
Posts: 9,097
And1: 8,590
Joined: Jul 05, 2014
Location: Dornbirn, Austria
     

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#299 » by Hornet Mania » Sun Nov 19, 2017 1:06 pm

I'm fine with benching Monk for the Clips game, but I hope it doesn't become a new trend.

The kid struggled mightily as a backup PG, but he was never (or at least I never read anyone who claimed it) was meant to be a PG, he's an undersized SG, and I'd like to see him get some steady minutes at that position off the bench.

For better or worse, Monk is one of the few guys on our roster with potential for dramatic improvement over the next few years. We need to make it a priority to feed him 5-10 minutes a night at minimum at his "real" NBA position and see how he progresses through the year.
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,950
And1: 16,972
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: We Want the Monk: The Malik Monk Thread 

Post#300 » by Liver_Pooty » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:55 pm

I think his future is at the PG position, though. We will see.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.

Return to Charlotte Hornets