ImageImageImage

Greg Monroe

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Greg Monroe 

Post#1 » by MotownMadness » Wed Nov 8, 2017 12:24 am

If Phoenix buys him out should we go after him and would he have interest in coming here for the season?

He's a very low key stay out of the spotlight kinda guy and might want to come back. Obviously wouldn't pay him big money moving forward but could help us this season I would think.

IDK, seems like something to watch for with our need on a backup center and Phoenix not really wanting him anyways. Just don't want him coming in here slowing things down so he would have to accept that backup low min role.
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#2 » by mattao313 » Wed Nov 8, 2017 12:28 am

Hell yeah if we can get him for the low
Championships
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#3 » by MotownMadness » Wed Nov 8, 2017 12:29 am

mattao313 wrote:Hell yeah if we can get him for the low

If hes bought out it shouldn't cost a new team more than a couple mil for the season. Forgot about Boston though as they will go after him and it gives the best chance to up his value for the offseason.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,260
And1: 5,249
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#4 » by Kilo » Wed Nov 8, 2017 12:37 am

And Boston has that injury money to spend. They'll get the pick of post-trade deadline releases. Not sure he'd want to come back here anyways.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#5 » by mattao313 » Wed Nov 8, 2017 12:43 am

MotownMadness wrote:
mattao313 wrote:Hell yeah if we can get him for the low

If hes bought out it shouldn't cost a new team more than a couple mil for the season. Forgot about Boston though as they will go after him and it gives the best chance to up his value for the offseason.

for the min. if we can get him he is a beast backup C. He'd probably want to start somewhere to get his next contract tho.
Championships
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,855
And1: 3,444
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#6 » by theBigLip » Wed Nov 8, 2017 1:00 am

He is an old school center and the game has changed so I'd rather pass on him. I don't think he would be happy coming back and being a backup. Plus, his agent seems pretty crafty at getting Monroe paid, so I just don't see us as an option.
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#7 » by Blkbrd671 » Wed Nov 8, 2017 1:37 am

theBigLip wrote:He is an old school center and the game has changed so I'd rather pass on him. I don't think he would be happy coming back and being a backup. Plus, his agent seems pretty crafty at getting Monroe paid, so I just don't see us as an option.


Exactly

for our team, we'd be better off going with Moreland than moose. Our problem isn't offensive weapons its defensive consistency and rim protection and setting good picks. Moose brings non of that


If we could find a way to get back baynes, thats the move we should make
flow
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,671
And1: 2,840
Joined: Feb 18, 2016

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#8 » by flow » Wed Nov 8, 2017 2:41 am

Why would he want to come back here after he went out of his way to leave here? Same coach, same GM.
DET_Athletics
Pro Prospect
Posts: 983
And1: 239
Joined: Dec 17, 2014
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#9 » by DET_Athletics » Wed Nov 8, 2017 2:49 am

Blkbrd671 wrote:
theBigLip wrote:He is an old school center and the game has changed so I'd rather pass on him. I don't think he would be happy coming back and being a backup. Plus, his agent seems pretty crafty at getting Monroe paid, so I just don't see us as an option.


Exactly

for our team, we'd be better off going with Moreland than moose. Our problem isn't offensive weapons its defensive consistency and rim protection and setting good picks. Moose brings non of that


If we could find a way to get back baynes, thats the move we should make

Baynes is the equivalent or worse than moose on defense.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,727
And1: 9,562
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#10 » by bstein14 » Wed Nov 8, 2017 2:51 am

Baynes has been performing incredibly well in Boston. His advanced defensive numbers are right up near the top of all centers. He's quickly become a fan favorite in Boston. He is obviously playing with a purpose after losing money in FA this past year and is going to make $10+ million next year if he continues doing what he's doing, starting at center for someone.
jakebernat
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,960
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 26, 2014
Location: downriver, MI

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#11 » by jakebernat » Wed Nov 8, 2017 2:54 am

DET_Athletics wrote:
Blkbrd671 wrote:
theBigLip wrote:He is an old school center and the game has changed so I'd rather pass on him. I don't think he would be happy coming back and being a backup. Plus, his agent seems pretty crafty at getting Monroe paid, so I just don't see us as an option.


Exactly

for our team, we'd be better off going with Moreland than moose. Our problem isn't offensive weapons its defensive consistency and rim protection and setting good picks. Moose brings non of that


If we could find a way to get back baynes, thats the move we should make

Baynes is the equivalent or worse than moose on defense.


Wow. I guess I didn’t realize how underappreciated baynes was around here.

He was a very good one on one post defender, who had surprisingly nimble feet given his size. I thought he actually protected the rim surprisingly well. He knows how to put himself in the right position.
jakebernat
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,960
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 26, 2014
Location: downriver, MI

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#12 » by jakebernat » Wed Nov 8, 2017 2:56 am

bstein14 wrote:Baynes has been performing incredibly well in Boston. His advanced defensive numbers are right up near the top of all centers. He's quickly become a fan favorite in Boston. He is obviously playing with a purpose after losing money in FA this past year and is going to make $10+ million next year if he continues doing what he's doing, starting at center for someone.


That should’ve been this season, but his game has no glitz or glamour. He’s not doing anything we haven’t seen before, but now he’s playing on a team getting national attention.
DET_Athletics
Pro Prospect
Posts: 983
And1: 239
Joined: Dec 17, 2014
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#13 » by DET_Athletics » Wed Nov 8, 2017 3:00 am

jakebernat wrote:
DET_Athletics wrote:
Blkbrd671 wrote:
Exactly

for our team, we'd be better off going with Moreland than moose. Our problem isn't offensive weapons its defensive consistency and rim protection and setting good picks. Moose brings non of that


If we could find a way to get back baynes, thats the move we should make

Baynes is the equivalent or worse than moose on defense.


Wow. I guess I didn’t realize how underappreciated baynes was around here.

He was a very good one on one post defender, who had surprisingly nimble feet given his size. I thought he actually protected the rim surprisingly well. He knows how to put himself in the right position.

0 block shots
0help defense
0% defensive anchor
You don't get points for being able to do the minimum of what your position requires, which is stay in front of your man. Not to mention his production pissed me off when dre would foul out amd he knew he was going to get big minutes and show out, those are the only time he really played hard on both ends.
User avatar
PrivateZer0
Sophomore
Posts: 232
And1: 286
Joined: Aug 07, 2013
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#14 » by PrivateZer0 » Wed Nov 8, 2017 3:59 am

Brandon Knight and Greg Monroe love to follow each other don't they
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#15 » by Blkbrd671 » Wed Nov 8, 2017 8:21 am

DET_Athletics wrote:
jakebernat wrote:
DET_Athletics wrote:Baynes is the equivalent or worse than moose on defense.


Wow. I guess I didn’t realize how underappreciated baynes was around here.

He was a very good one on one post defender, who had surprisingly nimble feet given his size. I thought he actually protected the rim surprisingly well. He knows how to put himself in the right position.

0 block shots
0help defense
0% defensive anchor
You don't get points for being able to do the minimum of what your position requires, which is stay in front of your man. Not to mention his production pissed me off when dre would foul out amd he knew he was going to get big minutes and show out, those are the only time he really played hard on both ends.


Baynes isn't going to light up the box score, but even SVG said, he does things that don't show up.

One of the main benefits of Baynes is he's one of the best screeners in the game,defensively he's at worst average in post defense and while not a shot blocker, he does alter shots. Comparing him to moose sh* defense is laughable
DET_Athletics
Pro Prospect
Posts: 983
And1: 239
Joined: Dec 17, 2014
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#16 » by DET_Athletics » Wed Nov 8, 2017 10:36 am

Blkbrd671 wrote:
DET_Athletics wrote:
jakebernat wrote:
Wow. I guess I didn’t realize how underappreciated baynes was around here.

He was a very good one on one post defender, who had surprisingly nimble feet given his size. I thought he actually protected the rim surprisingly well. He knows how to put himself in the right position.

0 block shots
0help defense
0% defensive anchor
You don't get points for being able to do the minimum of what your position requires, which is stay in front of your man. Not to mention his production pissed me off when dre would foul out amd he knew he was going to get big minutes and show out, those are the only time he really played hard on both ends.


Baynes isn't going to light up the box score, but even SVG said, he does things that don't show up.

One of the main benefits of Baynes is he's one of the best screeners in the game,defensively he's at worst average in post defense and while not a shot blocker, he does alter shots. Comparing him to moose sh* defense is laughable

that screener thing is overplayed, because yes he can screen to get someone open, but he's hardly an option after the screen. the best screeners in the league make you pick your poison, hes a chuckers best friend.
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#17 » by Blkbrd671 » Wed Nov 8, 2017 10:56 am

DET_Athletics wrote:
Blkbrd671 wrote:
DET_Athletics wrote:0 block shots
0help defense
0% defensive anchor
You don't get points for being able to do the minimum of what your position requires, which is stay in front of your man. Not to mention his production pissed me off when dre would foul out amd he knew he was going to get big minutes and show out, those are the only time he really played hard on both ends.


Baynes isn't going to light up the box score, but even SVG said, he does things that don't show up.

One of the main benefits of Baynes is he's one of the best screeners in the game,defensively he's at worst average in post defense and while not a shot blocker, he does alter shots. Comparing him to moose sh* defense is laughable

that screener thing is overplayed, because yes he can screen to get someone open, but he's hardly an option after the screen. the best screeners in the league make you pick your poison, hes a chuckers best friend.


That is not true whatso ever, your blaming our guards lack of recognition on Baynes. His value is not only that he screens out a player but also that he seals him off and forces help side with his wide body. Yes his size and lack of height limit where the guards can throw it, but in reality, its a matter of the guards finding the passing lanes that are there.
Billl
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,213
And1: 3,351
Joined: Sep 06, 2013

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#18 » by Billl » Wed Nov 8, 2017 2:13 pm

There is 0% change moose comes back here. Seriously. The guy couldn't get out of here fast enough. He didn't want to be part of this team ---- and who could blame him at the time.

Even if he didn't have baggage here, he would be looking for someplace to get major minutes. We obviously couldn't play him and dre together, so that would mean he gets strictly backup C minutes behind a potential all-star. He's not going to go somewhere where he only gets 15 mpg unless there is mop up duty.
User avatar
Manocad
RealGM
Posts: 69,969
And1: 10,562
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Middle Fingerton
Contact:
       

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#19 » by Manocad » Wed Nov 8, 2017 2:36 pm

I was never terribly wild about young Monroe and I'm certainly not wild about older Monroe. No thanks. The team is playing well right now. Leave it alone.
Image
pistons4ever
Junior
Posts: 403
And1: 142
Joined: Jul 03, 2016
         

Re: Greg Monroe 

Post#20 » by pistons4ever » Wed Nov 8, 2017 4:52 pm

Leuer and boban for Greg??? I would do this.... I would throw a pick into this, too..


I mean Greg is not a great player but as a bench player and especially on an expiring contract... YES YES YES


BUT SUNS WOULD NEVER DO THIS

Return to Detroit Pistons