NavLDO wrote:NTB wrote:
Oh, I hope so, or ya know, we could always TRADE Chandler and keep Monroe. Somebody please tell me what a 35 YO Chandler has over a 27 YO Monroe?
http://bkref.com/tiny/xVJwo
And before anyone mentions anything about offense, Monroe an actually shoot the ball beyond 3 feet. He also has a better DRtg (105 vs 109), more Stls, Blks, and Assts (per36) than Chandler. He has a higher FT%, lower PFs, and higher PTS. Yes, he avgs 25% less TRBs, and more TOs, but his Asst/TOV ratio vs Chandler is better (3.7/2.8...vs...0.8/1.8); which would you rather have?
Then add in Monroe's advantage in PER, WS, DBPM/OBPM, etc. and to me, it's an easy choice. Plus, $17+M for one year beats $13M over 2 for Chandler.
I swear, Chandler has pics, recorded audio/video, or some evidence of McD doing something shady, because this dude gets more opportunities than Len does, even though Len is clearly the better player at this point.
I agree, but at the same time I'd rather those 5 minutes go to Bender or Chriss than Monroe. I like Monroe a little as a player (though not at his salary). The issue is, he hurts your tank today and likely is playing for a contract elsewhere. So his purpose on this particular team is pretty limited. I think if Tyson was movable he would have been dealt already. I have an issue attaching anything more than a 2nd to move Tyson though because we are targeting 2019 FA (for good reason. There will be a lot more for us to potentially add in that class than 2018), and so getting off his salary doesn't help THAT much. It really just gives us the flexibility to take on a larger bad deal for maybe a better pick.