11/25 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (81) - (97) Dallas Mavericks

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

Player(s) of the Game

Carmelo Anthony | 16 PTS (6-12 FG, 4-7 3P)
5
19%
Steven Adams | 6 PTS (3-8 FG), 3 REB
1
4%
Russell Westbrook | 28 PTS (9-19 FG, 4-8 3P), 12 REB, 7 AST
7
26%
Terrance Ferguson | 7 PTS (3-5 FG, 1-3 3P)
6
22%
Nick Collison | 4 PTS (2-2 FG), 3 REB
7
26%
Other (specify below)
1
4%
 
Total votes: 27

User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: 11/25 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (81) - (97) Dallas Mavericks 

Post#61 » by Old Man Game » Sun Nov 26, 2017 3:46 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
Old Man Game wrote:This is why you don't just sub in random guys who aren't used to playing (especially rookies):

Read on Twitter


Old Man Game wrote:This whole thread is great:

Read on Twitter


I find it hard to pinpoint why are offense is so terrible, but his kinda shows something I've been feeling for a long time: It doesn't look all 5 guys are on the same page. It doesn't look like everybody is working towards a common goal on offense. We don't do A in order to do B so we can do C. We have no real flow offensively safe for when we can run after turnovers.

If I remember correctly, Donovan has talked about the offense 'reading what the defense gives them' multiple times. Sometimes it looks like that's our only strategy. And once that fails, we're reverting to the 'GIve me the ball, I'll get us some points' approach.
There has to be at least some kind of underlying strategy.


The thing of it is, if someone on the periphery of basketball like Miky Berra can spot these issues, you have to assume Donovan and his staff does as well. Yet the issues persist. Why is that? That question is pretty damning of his abilities to lead this team.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 11/25 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (81) - (97) Dallas Mavericks 

Post#62 » by Pillendreher » Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:02 pm

Old Man Game wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Old Man Game wrote:This is why you don't just sub in random guys who aren't used to playing (especially rookies):

Read on Twitter


Old Man Game wrote:This whole thread is great:

Read on Twitter


I find it hard to pinpoint why are offense is so terrible, but his kinda shows something I've been feeling for a long time: It doesn't look all 5 guys are on the same page. It doesn't look like everybody is working towards a common goal on offense. We don't do A in order to do B so we can do C. We have no real flow offensively safe for when we can run after turnovers.

If I remember correctly, Donovan has talked about the offense 'reading what the defense gives them' multiple times. Sometimes it looks like that's our only strategy. And once that fails, we're reverting to the 'GIve me the ball, I'll get us some points' approach.
There has to be at least some kind of underlying strategy.


The thing of it is, if someone on the periphery of basketball like Miky Berra can spot these issues, you have to assume Donovan and his staff does as well. Yet the issues persist. Why is that? That question is pretty damning of his abilities to lead this team.


Sometimes I think we make the mistake of thinking 'They can't be this stupid, right?!'. Sometimes people really are. Some people are good at their job, some are bad.

Either way: It's probable they see things, but maybe they just can't get it across. There's a difference between knowing something and teaching it to other people and getting them to act accordingly.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
sleestak33
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 17, 2017
   

Re: 11/25 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (81) - (97) Dallas Mavericks 

Post#63 » by sleestak33 » Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:21 pm

Donovan recipe for losing: Continue to start the worst offensive wing player in the history of the NBA and don't run any sort of offensive system whatsoever. As you can see when one of the big3 is completely off with George going 1-12 they're pretty much done even when it's against a weak opponent like Dallas because they have a decent offensive flow and consistently get easier shots from movement, screens, etc. Can somebody explain how the hell this is different from Scott Brooks? If they didn't even have a coach and were just going out there and doing whatever I don't see how this team would look any different. They are pretty much 20 games into the season and they just got throttled by a team that isn't going to make the playoffs. Panic button is ready to be hit...
Atomic Punk
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 328
Joined: Jul 03, 2017
Location: Earth

Re: 11/25 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (81) - (97) Dallas Mavericks 

Post#64 » by Atomic Punk » Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:27 pm

sleestak33 wrote:Donovan recipe for losing: Continue to start the worst offensive wing player in the history of the NBA and don't run any sort of offensive system whatsoever. As you can see when one of the big3 is completely off with George going 1-12 they're pretty much done even when it's against a weak opponent like Dallas because they have a decent offensive flow and consistently get easier shots from movement, screens, etc. Can somebody explain how the hell this is different from Scott Brooks? If they didn't even have a coach and were just going out there and doing whatever I don't see how this team would look any different. They are pretty much 20 games into the season and they just got throttled by a team that isn't going to make the playoffs. Panic button is ready to be hit...


Dre played 15 minutes last night, his offense was hardly the problem. In fact, his defense would have been usefull.
User avatar
ozwizard8
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,009
And1: 1,174
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
 

Re: 11/25 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (81) - (97) Dallas Mavericks 

Post#65 » by ozwizard8 » Mon Nov 27, 2017 8:31 am

sleestak33 wrote:Donovan recipe for losing: Continue to start the worst offensive wing player in the history of the NBA and don't run any sort of offensive system whatsoever. As you can see when one of the big3 is completely off with George going 1-12 they're pretty much done even when it's against a weak opponent like Dallas because they have a decent offensive flow and consistently get easier shots from movement, screens, etc. Can somebody explain how the hell this is different from Scott Brooks? If they didn't even have a coach and were just going out there and doing whatever I don't see how this team would look any different. They are pretty much 20 games into the season and they just got throttled by a team that isn't going to make the playoffs. Panic button is ready to be hit...

They need to solve this coaching issues.

At the end of the day OKC cant trade WB. Melo and P.George dont have trade value too.
Presti doesnt have any other move than firing Donovan.

Before firing him its time to force Donovan to change his rotations and offense. Donovan must feel the pressure. If he continue to suck then you fire him and get another coach.
sleestak33
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 17, 2017
   

Re: 11/25 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (81) - (97) Dallas Mavericks 

Post#66 » by sleestak33 » Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:01 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
sleestak33 wrote:Donovan recipe for losing: Continue to start the worst offensive wing player in the history of the NBA and don't run any sort of offensive system whatsoever. As you can see when one of the big3 is completely off with George going 1-12 they're pretty much done even when it's against a weak opponent like Dallas because they have a decent offensive flow and consistently get easier shots from movement, screens, etc. Can somebody explain how the hell this is different from Scott Brooks? If they didn't even have a coach and were just going out there and doing whatever I don't see how this team would look any different. They are pretty much 20 games into the season and they just got throttled by a team that isn't going to make the playoffs. Panic button is ready to be hit...


Dre played 15 minutes last night, his offense was hardly the problem. In fact, his defense would have been usefull.


He played 16 minutes and was 0-2 on a couple of wide open, completely unguarded 3 pointers (one of them hit the top of the backboard) and as usual passed up several wide open shots that any remotely decent NBA wing would have made and also botched several plays that would have been layups. He didn't cost them the game but if you put a remotely decent offensive wing out there it certainly would have closed the gap considerably in the final score.
Atomic Punk
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 328
Joined: Jul 03, 2017
Location: Earth

Re: 11/25 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (81) - (97) Dallas Mavericks 

Post#67 » by Atomic Punk » Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:15 pm

sleestak33 wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:
sleestak33 wrote:Donovan recipe for losing: Continue to start the worst offensive wing player in the history of the NBA and don't run any sort of offensive system whatsoever. As you can see when one of the big3 is completely off with George going 1-12 they're pretty much done even when it's against a weak opponent like Dallas because they have a decent offensive flow and consistently get easier shots from movement, screens, etc. Can somebody explain how the hell this is different from Scott Brooks? If they didn't even have a coach and were just going out there and doing whatever I don't see how this team would look any different. They are pretty much 20 games into the season and they just got throttled by a team that isn't going to make the playoffs. Panic button is ready to be hit...


Dre played 15 minutes last night, his offense was hardly the problem. In fact, his defense would have been usefull.


He played 16 minutes and was 0-2 on a couple of wide open, completely unguarded 3 pointers (one of them hit the top of the backboard) and as usual passed up several wide open shots that any remotely decent NBA wing would have made and also botched several plays that would have been layups. He didn't cost them the game but if you put a remotely decent offensive wing out there it certainly would have closed the gap considerably in the final score.


16 minutes, got it.

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder