The-Power wrote:doordoor123 wrote:I dropped them both. I like to take risks. Jaren Jackson I don’t have till 10. I love him and think he can be really good, but he fouls a lot and doesn’t have much of an offensive game. He needs to learn the game and gain weight.
I don't think that claim can be substantiated by either the numbers nor the footage of him. For his age Jackson is actually pretty advanced offensively for a big man – certainly for one who projects to be an elite defensive prospect. He's also already pretty strong physically for his age, just doesn't always know how and when to use his body properly.
In the ability to create his own shot? I don’t think so. Yes, he’s a good three point shooter, can dribble on the fast break, and has solid timing in the P&R, but he’s not a good screen setter yet, it’s going to be hard for him to finish the same way in the NBA (example: Willie Cauley-Stein), he doesn’t have a diverse post game and can’t overpower guys in the same way in the NBA, etc. Hes a good shooter, but he needs to develop the rest of his game. He needs diversity. Dayonta Davis was also had similar issues coming out of college and as of now had a similar profile (except Davis is shorter and is shooting less threes).
Don’t get me wrong, I think he’s going to be really good in time, but I don’t have faith in his offense translating as much as I do other players. Players who are better passers and can create for themselves/more advanced at that age are better prospects. I would rather have a player that can get a last second bucket or pass and make the team better by getting other players buckets.