gtn130 wrote:nate33 wrote:Pointgod wrote:
I’m sure you can provide primary documents that show Mccabes testimony and not just second hand information from Devin Nunes.
So you think Nunes put a blatantly false piece of information in the most scrutinized congressional memo of all time? And the entire Republican Congress, including plenty of Never Trumpers signed off on it even though the McCabe testimony will surely be released eventually? And you think I'm a conspiracy nut?
This is a critical piece of information, and because it doesn't fit your template, you're going to just ignore it? LOL
Nate, buddy, you're not good at this.
Nunes uses very specific wording. Here's what the memo actually said:
"no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information."
The Steele dossier information. Interesting, that appendage isn't it? I wonder why they wouldn't just say 'Steele dossier' there? Maybe it's because the information has been corroborated, and there are other additional sources dictating the FISA warrant application.
Nunes is being intentionally misleading here, and you're falling for it.
That's a heck of a leap to be making based on a questionable semantic interpretation. If the information was independent verified, then it would no longer be Steele dossier information. It would be "information".


















