ImageImage

2018 Brewers Discussion - Yelich Signing on Page 45

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,632
And1: 4,467
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1621 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Feb 12, 2018 3:58 pm

Given the rumors that the Dodgers said that their Darvish offer was contingent on making moves to get under the tax threshold, even though Haudricourt is a boob most of the time, I do think I may believe him on this. The Cubs were literally the only large market in the bidding and I think Stearns was trying to keep them honest.

Also, I think they'd have taken a lowballed Darvish contract to Milwaukee because I think Stearns also sees this as the offseason of opportunity given that all of the heavy hitters are sitting out the big free agent contracts.

I will walk back this theory if in the coming week(s) we see teams like Boston or the Dodgers sign themselves over the threshold with Arrieta or something, but I think that the Cubs were truly in a great spot bidding against almost no peers and Stearns had to step in and at least try to pretend that somebody could compete with their offers.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,495
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1622 » by Turk Nowitzki » Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:20 pm

This is from Heyman and it has to be some straight from Scott Boras BS or Arrieta is going to regret this:

Darvish was the focus by that point, but with some uncertainty about whether he’d take the deal, Epstein made the call to Arrieta to see where he stood. And to no one’s surprise, while Arrieta surely appreciated the gesture, he wasn’t immediately prepared to accept a six-year deal for what was believed to be for a similar annual salary, which was important for the Cubs, who are intent on staying under the $197 million threshold that has become an impediment in the free-agent market.
DingleJerry
RealGM
Posts: 15,219
And1: 10,851
Joined: Jul 09, 2015
       

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1623 » by DingleJerry » Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:27 pm

Just kind of antsy to see the next flurry of moves that Darvish finally signing hopefully triggers. Can't believe we're days away from spring training with likely lots of moves to happen still for the whole league. I'd be surprised if MKE doesn't end up with a SP somehow.
Resident Lillard truther since 2015.
User avatar
Gianstoppable
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,585
And1: 1,743
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1624 » by Gianstoppable » Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:55 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:This is from Heyman and it has to be some straight from Scott Boras BS or Arrieta is going to regret this:

Darvish was the focus by that point, but with some uncertainty about whether he’d take the deal, Epstein made the call to Arrieta to see where he stood. And to no one’s surprise, while Arrieta surely appreciated the gesture, he wasn’t immediately prepared to accept a six-year deal for what was believed to be for a similar annual salary, which was important for the Cubs, who are intent on staying under the $197 million threshold that has become an impediment in the free-agent market.


So Arrieta wants MORE than Yu got? Or am I reading that wrong. Also, 6 years on Jake? Yikes. Id go 3-4 max. Hard pass.
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,632
And1: 4,467
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1625 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:05 pm

Could also be the Cubs who were pissed by his hard-bargaining and they've released this news and they're fudging the supposed offer a bit as well but trying to tell the public that they were trying to be loyal to their old friend.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,495
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1626 » by Turk Nowitzki » Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:20 pm

Yeah, that could be it too. The whole wording of that statement was very vague, probably on purpose.
User avatar
Wisky4life
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,328
And1: 1,232
Joined: Feb 05, 2014
Contact:

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1627 » by Wisky4life » Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:12 am

3 years $75-$100 mil for Arrieta with Team option year 4. Would be a sweet deal.
“We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees.” –Jason Kidd
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1628 » by El Duderino » Tue Feb 13, 2018 1:14 am

Turk Nowitzki wrote:This is from Heyman and it has to be some straight from Scott Boras BS or Arrieta is going to regret this:

Darvish was the focus by that point, but with some uncertainty about whether he’d take the deal, Epstein made the call to Arrieta to see where he stood. And to no one’s surprise, while Arrieta surely appreciated the gesture, he wasn’t immediately prepared to accept a six-year deal for what was believed to be for a similar annual salary, which was important for the Cubs, who are intent on staying under the $197 million threshold that has become an impediment in the free-agent market.


If Boras is intent on getting six years for Arrieta, they both should be prepared for him to miss the season because i'd be shocked to see any team give him six years,
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,632
And1: 4,467
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1629 » by Kerb Hohl » Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:08 am

El Duderino wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:This is from Heyman and it has to be some straight from Scott Boras BS or Arrieta is going to regret this:

Darvish was the focus by that point, but with some uncertainty about whether he’d take the deal, Epstein made the call to Arrieta to see where he stood. And to no one’s surprise, while Arrieta surely appreciated the gesture, he wasn’t immediately prepared to accept a six-year deal for what was believed to be for a similar annual salary, which was important for the Cubs, who are intent on staying under the $197 million threshold that has become an impediment in the free-agent market.


If Boras is intent on getting six years for Arrieta, they both should be prepared for him to miss the season because i'd be shocked to see any team give him six years,


Agree...I could see it if some desperate large market lost out on other key targets, but the large markets are not participating in this offseason save for the Cubs having room for one big deal (Darvish).
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,103
And1: 42,343
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1630 » by ReasonablySober » Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:57 am

Read on Twitter
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,662
And1: 55,960
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1631 » by MickeyDavis » Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:38 am

Funny (not really) to hear about Cubs, Yankees and other big market teams trying to stay under $197 million while the Brewers, at most, can go to around $110 or so. I hate baseball's salary structure. Looking forward to Harper in our division next year.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1632 » by El Duderino » Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:51 am

Kerb Hohl wrote:
El Duderino wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:This is from Heyman and it has to be some straight from Scott Boras BS or Arrieta is going to regret this:



If Boras is intent on getting six years for Arrieta, they both should be prepared for him to miss the season because i'd be shocked to see any team give him six years,


Agree...I could see it if some desperate large market lost out on other key targets, but the large markets are not participating in this offseason save for the Cubs having room for one big deal (Darvish).


The Red Sox are looking for a bat, but even they are balking at giving JD Martinez and Boras the number of years they want.

Given nobody else seems heavily in on Martinez, Boston can sit back and not negotiate against themselves.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,632
And1: 4,467
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1633 » by Kerb Hohl » Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:54 am

El Duderino wrote:
Kerb Hohl wrote:
El Duderino wrote:
If Boras is intent on getting six years for Arrieta, they both should be prepared for him to miss the season because i'd be shocked to see any team give him six years,


Agree...I could see it if some desperate large market lost out on other key targets, but the large markets are not participating in this offseason save for the Cubs having room for one big deal (Darvish).


The Red Sox are looking for a bat, but even they are balking at giving JD Martinez and Boras the number of years they want.

Given nobody else seems heavily in on Martinez, Boston can sit back and not negotiate against themselves.


I think since Boston is already over, they may be willing to just sit in the tax again and pay up for Martinez after his price comes down from having minimal competition as you say.

They are the only possible big market left and it’s still not totally clear that they’re willing to spend yet...maybe they trade themselves back under the threshold, but they probably will go for Martinez eventually.
User avatar
Gianstoppable
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,585
And1: 1,743
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1634 » by Gianstoppable » Tue Feb 13, 2018 1:52 pm

Kerb Hohl wrote:
El Duderino wrote:
Kerb Hohl wrote:
Agree...I could see it if some desperate large market lost out on other key targets, but the large markets are not participating in this offseason save for the Cubs having room for one big deal (Darvish).


The Red Sox are looking for a bat, but even they are balking at giving JD Martinez and Boras the number of years they want.

Given nobody else seems heavily in on Martinez, Boston can sit back and not negotiate against themselves.


I think since Boston is already over, they may be willing to just sit in the tax again and pay up for Martinez after his price comes down from having minimal competition as you say.

They are the only possible big market left and it’s still not totally clear that they’re willing to spend yet...maybe they trade themselves back under the threshold, but they probably will go for Martinez eventually.


For some reason I just now noticed the numbers JD put up last year. Holy ****
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
Gianstoppable
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,585
And1: 1,743
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1635 » by Gianstoppable » Tue Feb 13, 2018 1:54 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Funny (not really) to hear about Cubs, Yankees and other big market teams trying to stay under $197 million while the Brewers, at most, can go to around $110 or so. I hate baseball's salary structure. Looking forward to Harper in our division next year.


At least they are trying to stay under 197 and not 300. Baby steps lol
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,632
And1: 4,467
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1636 » by Kerb Hohl » Tue Feb 13, 2018 2:10 pm

Well all of those teams will likely rocket back up next year. Just trying to reset the lux tax penalty.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,662
And1: 55,960
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1637 » by MickeyDavis » Tue Feb 13, 2018 2:13 pm

First spring training game Friday
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Tfence92
Starter
Posts: 2,476
And1: 435
Joined: Feb 14, 2015

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1638 » by Tfence92 » Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:12 pm

Apparently Stearns responding to a question about Braun replied with, "We have him penciled in at 1B vs LHP at the moment"
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,605
And1: 4,463
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1639 » by MVP2110 » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:52 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:First spring training game Friday


Next Friday isn't it?
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
Tfence92
Starter
Posts: 2,476
And1: 435
Joined: Feb 14, 2015

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Out On Darvish, pg 79. 

Post#1640 » by Tfence92 » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:54 pm

MVP2110 wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:First spring training game Friday


Next Friday isn't it?


Yes, 2/23

Return to Milwaukee Brewers