XtremeDunkz wrote:14-34.......
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
14-36
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
XtremeDunkz wrote:14-34.......
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Concernedcad wrote:Mitchell is unreal. He has to be ROTY.
RB34 wrote:XtremeDunkz wrote:14-34.......
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
14-36
clyde21 wrote:RB34 wrote:XtremeDunkz wrote:14-34.......
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
14-36
So what? He's a rookie. The fact that he's carrying the offense load for Utah almost single-handedly and not backing down is incredible. Defenses are throwing the entire book on him and he's still producing.
#Legend
RB34 wrote:clyde21 wrote:RB34 wrote:
14-36
So what? He's a rookie. The fact that he's carrying the offense load for Utah almost single-handedly and not backing down is incredible. Defenses are throwing the entire book on him and he's still producing.
#Legend
Just trying to look at it the same way Ben Simmons get looked at.
Patsfan1081 wrote:michaelm wrote:Black Mage wrote:
The game is 4 quarters. If not for his teammates carrying the load for 3/4's of a game it wouldn't even matter what DM did in the 4th.
Simmons plays a full 3 to 4 quarters every game, whether it is scoring, or getting his teammates going or playing lockdown defense.
To be clear, I am Australian and an out and out Simmons fan, but am annoyed by those who feel the need to deride another great young player in Mitchell.
And yes the game is played over 4 quarters, and what matters I would have thought is a player's team winning the game, whether by a consistent level of play over the whole 4 quarters or by better play/clutch shooting in the 4th quarter. Both players haven't played 82 games yet, and both Simmons' heady and consistent play as a rookie PG and Mitchell's ability to win games for his team by clutch shooting in the 4th quarter are remarkable given the inexperience of both players.
Mitchell's shooting in the clutch stats are 38/24%, how exactly is that remarkable? Compare that to Simmons, who is 67/0 or even Tatum 62/67%...
clyde21 wrote:RB34 wrote:clyde21 wrote:
So what? He's a rookie. The fact that he's carrying the offense load for Utah almost single-handedly and not backing down is incredible. Defenses are throwing the entire book on him and he's still producing.
#Legend
Just trying to look at it the same way Ben Simmons get looked at.
Ben Simmons doesn't have the onus of carrying the entire Sixers offense on his shoulders, and I don't think he'll ever have to shoot it 35 times. It's a non-point.
RB34 wrote:clyde21 wrote:RB34 wrote:
Just trying to look at it the same way Ben Simmons get looked at.
Ben Simmons doesn't have the onus of carrying the entire Sixers offense on his shoulders, and I don't think he'll ever have to shoot it 35 times. It's a non-point.
You think Simmons does not effect the 6ers offence? You’re kidding yourself.
clyde21 wrote:RB34 wrote:clyde21 wrote:
So what? He's a rookie. The fact that he's carrying the offense load for Utah almost single-handedly and not backing down is incredible. Defenses are throwing the entire book on him and he's still producing.
#Legend
Just trying to look at it the same way Ben Simmons get looked at.
Ben Simmons doesn't have the onus of carrying the entire Sixers offense on his shoulders, and I don't think he'll ever have to shoot it 35 times. It's a non-point.
clyde21 wrote:RB34 wrote:clyde21 wrote:
Ben Simmons doesn't have the onus of carrying the entire Sixers offense on his shoulders, and I don't think he'll ever have to shoot it 35 times. It's a non-point.
You think Simmons does not effect the 6ers offence? You’re kidding yourself.
Lol...are you ok? When the heck did I say that? Read that sentence again.
Black Mage wrote:clyde21 wrote:RB34 wrote:
You think Simmons does not effect the 6ers offence? You’re kidding yourself.
Lol...are you ok? When the heck did I say that? Read that sentence again.
I read your post the same as RB34. Maybe you know what you meant, but it certainly didn't come out as you think it did.
clyde21 wrote:RB34 wrote:XtremeDunkz wrote:14-34.......
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
14-36
So what? He's a rookie. The fact that he's carrying the offense load for Utah almost single-handedly and not backing down is incredible. Defenses are throwing the entire book on him and he's still producing.
#Legend
michaelm wrote:Patsfan1081 wrote:michaelm wrote:To be clear, I am Australian and an out and out Simmons fan, but am annoyed by those who feel the need to deride another great young player in Mitchell.
And yes the game is played over 4 quarters, and what matters I would have thought is a player's team winning the game, whether by a consistent level of play over the whole 4 quarters or by better play/clutch shooting in the 4th quarter. Both players haven't played 82 games yet, and both Simmons' heady and consistent play as a rookie PG and Mitchell's ability to win games for his team by clutch shooting in the 4th quarter are remarkable given the inexperience of both players.
Mitchell's shooting in the clutch stats are 38/24%, how exactly is that remarkable? Compare that to Simmons, who is 67/0 or even Tatum 62/67%...
Who cares ?. What matters is winning the games (which Utah didn't end up doing tonight obviously), not the shooting percentage of a player instrumental in winning.
I am a Simmons partisan as I said, and as has been posted elsewhere his point guard play seems to be ever improving and his team is winning more now imo significantly as a consequence of this, as well as having bolstered their bench, without him needing to score more points than he does. The 76ers also imo will end up the better team this season, although I accept arguments this shouldn't necessarily be a factor in deciding ROTY.
bebopdeluxe wrote:clyde21 wrote:RB34 wrote:
14-36
So what? He's a rookie. The fact that he's carrying the offense load for Utah almost single-handedly and not backing down is incredible. Defenses are throwing the entire book on him and he's still producing.
#Legend
Dude shot 14-for-35 (40%)...4–for-13 from 3 (31%). You call that producing?
I call that high-volume, high-usage chucking.
Seriously. This guy has ridiculously high usage, is a completely undisciplined 3-point shooter, but HE GETS POINTZ!!!...so it’s all good.
And, as was pointed out above, his “clutch” shooting numbers are nothing to write home about either.
THIRTY FIVE shots. Wow.
Snyder has given the kid the keys to the candy store, and the kid is EATING. He is an unquestioned talent. But given his insane usage %, and the insane minutes he is playing for a rookie, the fact that Simmons is STILL smoking Mitchell from an analytical/statistical perspective just reinforces how inefficient Mitchell is.
(and I am a Sixers/Iverson fan...so I understand the challenges of rooting for a volume shooter/scorer)
clyde21 wrote:bebopdeluxe wrote:clyde21 wrote:
So what? He's a rookie. The fact that he's carrying the offense load for Utah almost single-handedly and not backing down is incredible. Defenses are throwing the entire book on him and he's still producing.
#Legend
Dude shot 14-for-35 (40%)...4–for-13 from 3 (31%). You call that producing?
I call that high-volume, high-usage chucking.
Seriously. This guy has ridiculously high usage, is a completely undisciplined 3-point shooter, but HE GETS POINTZ!!!...so it’s all good.
And, as was pointed out above, his “clutch” shooting numbers are nothing to write home about either.
THIRTY FIVE shots. Wow.
Snyder has given the kid the keys to the candy store, and the kid is EATING. He is an unquestioned talent. But given his insane usage %, and the insane minutes he is playing for a rookie, the fact that Simmons is STILL smoking Mitchell from an analytical/statistical perspective just reinforces how inefficient Mitchell is.
(and I am a Sixers/Iverson fan...so I understand the challenges of rooting for a volume shooter/scorer)
I get why Sixers fans are hating on Mitchell. It makes sense.
clyde21 wrote:Black Mage wrote:clyde21 wrote:
Lol...are you ok? When the heck did I say that? Read that sentence again.
I read your post the same as RB34. Maybe you know what you meant, but it certainly didn't come out as you think it did.
How did it come out? I'm curious.
Here it is again:
"Simmons doesn't have the onus of carrying the entire Sixers offense on his shoulders."
Somehow in your head that translates into:
"Simmons does not effect the 6ers offense"
???
clyde21 wrote:Black Mage wrote:clyde21 wrote:
Lol...are you ok? When the heck did I say that? Read that sentence again.
I read your post the same as RB34. Maybe you know what you meant, but it certainly didn't come out as you think it did.
How did it come out? I'm curious.
Here it is again:
"Simmons doesn't have the onus of carrying the entire Sixers offense on his shoulders."
Somehow in your head that translates into:
"Simmons does not effect the 6ers offense"
???
RB34 wrote:clyde21 wrote:Black Mage wrote:
I read your post the same as RB34. Maybe you know what you meant, but it certainly didn't come out as you think it did.
How did it come out? I'm curious.
Here it is again:
"Simmons doesn't have the onus of carrying the entire Sixers offense on his shoulders."
Somehow in your head that translates into:
"Simmons does not effect the 6ers offense"
???
There were 4 other Jazz players in double figures including 2 with 20. Mitchell doesn’t carry the entire offence, stop.
RB34 wrote:clyde21 wrote:Black Mage wrote:
I read your post the same as RB34. Maybe you know what you meant, but it certainly didn't come out as you think it did.
How did it come out? I'm curious.
Here it is again:
"Simmons doesn't have the onus of carrying the entire Sixers offense on his shoulders."
Somehow in your head that translates into:
"Simmons does not effect the 6ers offense"
???
There were 4 other Jazz players in double figures including 2 with 20. Mitchell doesn’t carry the entire offence, stop.
Black Mage wrote:clyde21 wrote:Black Mage wrote:
I read your post the same as RB34. Maybe you know what you meant, but it certainly didn't come out as you think it did.
How did it come out? I'm curious.
Here it is again:
"Simmons doesn't have the onus of carrying the entire Sixers offense on his shoulders."
Somehow in your head that translates into:
"Simmons does not effect the 6ers offense"
???
I don't know how you can say the primary play initiator and team leader in assists doesn't have the onus of the offense put on him. He doesn't score it like Embiid, I get that, but he orchestrates the offense and tells guys where to go or where they need to be.