getrichordie wrote:Do you understand what a motion offense is?
Yes. Do you? When you're 29th in touches per game, 29th in distance covered on offense per game and 28th in average speed on offense, there is no 'motion'. Everybody who watches Thunder games can tell you that 60 % of our lineup at any given time doesn't do ****. Standing around is the opposite of being in motion.
getrichordie wrote:You might not see it fully utilized because of the personnel we have doesn’t really fit it well.
Donovan has already gone through 36 total players in the 3 seasons he has been here. What are the chances this so called 'system' can't be run with 3 different rosters?
getrichordie wrote:It’s a simplified version (again, due to lack of appropriate personnel), but yes there is a system.A lot of you just don’t like it. Doesn’t mean there isn’t a system because you don’t like it. It just means you think there is a better system out there to be ran, but I’m still waiting on suggestions on what offense would have benefited this group more this year.
'Give the ball to Russell and let's see where it takes us' is not a system.
'Let Enes post somebody up and you watch' is not a system.
'Let Jerami draw fts' is not a system.
'Everybody don't move, we don't want to spook the opponent' is not a system.
'Just give Paul/Kevin the ball and let him struggle to do anything while you bench guys give him space' is not a system.
Donovan's 'system' is relying on individual players to carry his lineups. That's the so called 'system'. Running some weave every two weeks is not a 'system'. The bench passing around the perimeter because they can't create a shot is not a 'system'. Running the Hawk set twice per game even though everybody knows what's coming is not a 'system'.
Donovan's 'system' looks like the way I play NBA 2K when the plays break down and nothing is happening: Run a PnR and see where that takes us.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said