NFL Draft Discussion

Moderator: bwgood77

User avatar
Mich3006
Head Coach
Posts: 6,492
And1: 3,682
Joined: Jul 04, 2009
Location: Lower Bavaria, Germany
     

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#961 » by Mich3006 » Fri Apr 27, 2018 4:39 am

If the Giants get Will Hernandez (please, Cleveland) they‘re back on track.

This draft is crazy, such good draft choices and trades for most of the teams.
User avatar
PhilBlackson
RealGM
Posts: 31,773
And1: 46,517
Joined: May 02, 2017
Location: No Wastemans Land
     

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#962 » by PhilBlackson » Fri Apr 27, 2018 4:44 am

Ballerhogger wrote:Winners for round 1
Bills, Broncos , ravens


Personally I don't feel like the Bills were winners, I don't like Allen at all. He's all measurements, no performance. With the NFL it's almost impossible to be 100% certain of anything but his performance in college was nothing like Wentz like they're trying to compare him to based on measurements. Reminds me of Bruno Cabaclo being compared to Giannis in the NBA. We'll see I guess...

Ballerhogger wrote:Browns should got chub or Barkley first then got mayfield . Bad picks


I agree they should have taken Chubb but there was obviously no need to take him 1st overall when he was there for them at 4th (as it was pretty much guaranteed one of Barkley or Chubb would be). Personally not a huge fan of taking Mayfield but since they were high on them it was smarter of them to take him first since he was long rumored to be the guy the Jets had their eyes on at 3.

Ballerhogger wrote:
laika wrote:I guess the Tom Brady era might not be over yet.
they should draft mason Rudolph


I always thought Rudolph was a far more likely pick than Jackson for the Pats. Didn't make any sense that an ol school coach like BB would suddenly pick a guy that is the opposite of that n requires a completely new age/style of play.
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<< :guitar: *INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON*
Image
Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
Papi_swav
General Manager
Posts: 9,301
And1: 4,880
Joined: Jan 03, 2016
     

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#963 » by Papi_swav » Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:08 am

Not really feeling the Hurst pick when we had Edmunds and James at 16 but really happy on the Lamar Jackson pick, I think we gave up a little too much though.
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,250
And1: 9,955
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#964 » by TyCobb » Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:19 am

Darnold is the best QB in this draft. He has 'it'. Enjoy New York, you got a good one.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,383
And1: 29,315
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
       

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#965 » by blazza18 » Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:02 am

Hearing some of the quotes from the Giants GM about Eli and taking a RB at 2 and I can't stop laughing. So glad to be in their division.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,660
And1: 2,190
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#966 » by High 5 » Fri Apr 27, 2018 7:41 am

Happy with the Ridley pick. We needed a replacement for Gabriel and Ridley can be much more. Now we just need Sark to do something with all of these weapons...
laika
Analyst
Posts: 3,044
And1: 1,996
Joined: Mar 22, 2011

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#967 » by laika » Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:08 pm

blazza18 wrote:Hearing some of the quotes from the Giants GM about Eli and taking a RB at 2 and I can't stop laughing. So glad to be in their division.


I agree. RB is clearly the most replaceable position in the league. A RB has to have significant hall of fame potential to justify taking him 2nd. This could turn out to be a terrible pick.

Once again Belichick made a questionable decision. The Patriots have far bigger weaknesses than running back and probably could have traded back to get Michel anyways. Also, picking a running back that can't catch is a mistake.
User avatar
Mich3006
Head Coach
Posts: 6,492
And1: 3,682
Joined: Jul 04, 2009
Location: Lower Bavaria, Germany
     

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#968 » by Mich3006 » Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:17 pm

laika wrote:
blazza18 wrote:Hearing some of the quotes from the Giants GM about Eli and taking a RB at 2 and I can't stop laughing. So glad to be in their division.


I agree. RB is clearly the most replaceable position in the league. A RB has to have significant hall of fame potential to justify taking him 2nd. This could turn out to be a terrible pick.

Once again Belichick made a questionable decision. The Patriots have far bigger weaknesses than running back and probably could have traded back to get Michel anyways. Also, picking a running back that can't catch is a mistake.

Saquon Barkley is one of the most talented RB´s of all-time and we´ve heard the same concerns the last two years regarding Elliott and Fournette as well and look what they did.

I guess the 2nd pick wasn´t unavailable but the Giants didn´t get a good offer. They did the right thing, get the best player in this year´s class.
No-Man
RealGM
Posts: 14,879
And1: 3,480
Joined: Feb 11, 2012

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#969 » by No-Man » Fri Apr 27, 2018 1:49 pm

Ayatollah wrote:Saquon Barkley is one of the most talented RB´s of all-time and we´ve heard the same concerns the last two years regarding Elliott and Fournette as well and look what they did.

I guess the 2nd pick wasn´t unavailable but the Giants didn´t get a good offer. They did the right thing, get the best player in this year´s class.

The Jags were better without Fournette last year, and although he is talented there is no way he goes close to where he went in a re-draft, same with Elliott who is much better than him, but Dallas would take Ramsey without question in that position, heck, they would have drafted Dak 4th if they knew how good he was gonna be

Gettleman comes out as really outdated and limited when it comes to scouting, the good news is, 75% of the NFL operates that way, the fact that they stick to a board and aggregated draft grades is ridiculous :lol:
XDevilBoiX
Head Coach
Posts: 7,173
And1: 2,481
Joined: Dec 05, 2014
Location: PA
       

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#970 » by XDevilBoiX » Fri Apr 27, 2018 1:58 pm

I don’t like the Eagles trade. Don’t get it, short on picks this year and to move back 20 slots to get a 2nd next year and swap 4th rd picks. The swap was 7 picks apart lol
User avatar
Mich3006
Head Coach
Posts: 6,492
And1: 3,682
Joined: Jul 04, 2009
Location: Lower Bavaria, Germany
     

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#971 » by Mich3006 » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:02 pm

Fischella wrote:
Ayatollah wrote:Saquon Barkley is one of the most talented RB´s of all-time and we´ve heard the same concerns the last two years regarding Elliott and Fournette as well and look what they did.

I guess the 2nd pick wasn´t unavailable but the Giants didn´t get a good offer. They did the right thing, get the best player in this year´s class.

The Jags were better without Fournette last year, and although he is talented there is no way he goes close to where he went in a re-draft, same with Elliott who is much better than him, but Dallas would take Ramsey without question in that position, heck, they would have drafted Dak 4th if they knew how good he was gonna be

Gettleman comes out as really outdated and limited when it comes to scouting, the good news is, 75% of the NFL operates that way, the fact that they stick to a board and aggregated draft grades is ridiculous :lol:

If they‘ll be able to draft Hernandez their oline is way better than last year and with Barkley, the Giants gave Manning one of the best offensive weapons in the league (OBJ, Sheppard, Engram and Saquon is top5 IMO)
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,653
And1: 16,358
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#972 » by Dr Positivity » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:14 pm

Liberate The Zoomers
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,934
And1: 10,332
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#973 » by HMFFL » Fri Apr 27, 2018 3:32 pm

Stud,

I'm in Saudi Arabia.

Sent from my [device_name] using [url]RealGM mobile app[/url]
Yoshun
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,915
And1: 5,549
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
       

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#974 » by Yoshun » Fri Apr 27, 2018 4:08 pm

blazza18 wrote:Hearing some of the quotes from the Giants GM about Eli and taking a RB at 2 and I can't stop laughing. So glad to be in their division.


Barkley was exactly what we needed. Eli has been playing behind a poor line with no running game for years now. We still need to work on the line, but adding a play-making running back to the team was huge. We definitely lucked out the Browns did not take Barkley first, crazy on their part.
User avatar
Otis Driftwood
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,726
And1: 2,093
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Contact:
       

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#975 » by Otis Driftwood » Fri Apr 27, 2018 4:41 pm

Guess the Cowboys need to draft a TE now...

Read on Twitter
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,024
And1: 4,464
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#976 » by LAKESHOW » Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:04 pm

Bulltalk wrote:
hermes wrote:now vita vea is a really big boy


The guy's strong as Hercules, fast as a linebacker, a total athletic beast for his 345 pounds.

Awesome pick. The last of the Sarkesian recruits. This guy and Greg Gaines at the nose. We shall finally see what Peterson can do with fully his own recruits.
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 31,895
And1: 16,005
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: The Last of Us Part II
       

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#977 » by Cactus Jack » Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:08 pm

LAKESHOW wrote:
Bulltalk wrote:
hermes wrote:now vita vea is a really big boy


The guy's strong as Hercules, fast as a linebacker, a total athletic beast for his 345 pounds.

Awesome pick. The last of the Sarkesian recruits. This guy and Greg Gaines at the nose. We shall finally see what Peterson can do with fully his own recruits.

He has a strong recruiting class coming in. :wink:
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#978 » by FNQ » Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:44 pm

Fischella wrote:The Jags were better without Fournette last year,


Ok, let's stop right there because this narrative I've heard several times, and its patently ridiculous. It's based off the idea that in the 3 games the Jags played without Fournette, their rushing yards per game went up.

But here is the reason why:

Jags won all 3 games comfortably, the closest by 16 points. They played against 2 of the worst run defenses in the league (CIN/IND) and then against the punchless Texans with TJ Yates starting.

Against HOU: 38 carries, 138 yards (3.6)
Against IND: 37 carries, 188 yards (5.1) - the majority coming on one TJ Yeldon run of 58 yards on a busted run play. Without that, 3.6 ypc.
Against CIN: 40 carries, 149 yards (3.9)


For the season, the Jags averaged 4.3 yards per carry, and ran the ball 32 times per game. In all 3 games, the Jags were running inefficiently to end the game, but gain yardage which is ludicrously used as evidence against Fournette, who was 2nd highest in YAC. Side note - Blake Bortles was great in all 3 games. Not that any of those defenses provided much of a challenge, but whatever.

No one who watches football should ever conclude that the Jaguars were better without Fournette. They got more rushing yards per game without him (12 per game) on 6 more rushing attempts per game, and if you factor out TJ Yeldon's one aberration run, its not even close. Fournette clearly impacted the game because teams forced Bortles to beat them often, and he's not so incompetent that he couldn't. Take him off the team and everyone goes right back to pressuring Bortles and the Jags go right back to being a top 10 turnover prone team. With Fournette, they dropped down to 17th, from 7th.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#979 » by FNQ » Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:50 pm

Ayatollah wrote:If they‘ll be able to draft Hernandez their oline is way better than last year and with Barkley, the Giants gave Manning one of the best offensive weapons in the league (OBJ, Sheppard, Engram and Saquon is top5 IMO)


Im not sure I would have taken him over Chubb, but the inherent value an elite RB provides is dramatically understated. The back has to be elite though, and Barkley still has to prove it. But when the RB becomes the focal point of the defense, it makes QBs much better. It makes opposing defenses take more hits on the line. It helps reduce turnovers. It absolutely can change the game. For all the bluster about Dak, he sure looked average without Zeke eating up all the defensive attention. Bortles went from junk time all star to competent game manager.

It's a fine pick and one that should dramatically improve the Giants offense. Their defense is a huge concern but there's still plenty of time to deal with that
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: NFL Draft Discussion 

Post#980 » by FNQ » Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:52 pm

Otis Driftwood wrote:Guess the Cowboys need to draft a TE now...

Read on Twitter


Hopefully he let them know pre-draft.

Cowboys' pass-catchers situation looking pretty grim right now. At least we'll see if Rico Gathers is for real?

Hurns/T-Will/Deonte... yikes. Maybe ya'll can trade for Seth Roberts? :D

Return to The General NFL Board