gaspar wrote:
LEBRON
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez


bwgood77 wrote:

JMac1 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Sreister wrote:Thad Young sounds like he may opt out. Any chance we could lure him in as our "Redick" type vet? He was huge for Indy last year and we could use him if we try and trade one of Chriss or Bender in an attempt to acquire a PG. He was a leader on that team and is super versatile. Just not sure if we'd have the money to take him away from Indy.
I think we can't afford to bring in people who cannot shoot the 3 above avg at least.
That includes Doncic?
bwgood77 wrote:I think Doncic will be a fine shooter. I know him and Trae struggled when defenses picked them up halfcourt and they took a lot of shots off the dribble, but they are both big time shot makers.
I mean I wouldn't rule out adding Ayton, Doncic or Young just because they shot below NBA league avg from 3 because I think they can can get there....Doncic and Young especially will benefit from so much more spacing and less defensive attention.
I'm talking about free agency here in the free agency and trade thread and spending a lot of money on a vet addition.

darealjuice wrote:bwgood77 wrote:I think Doncic will be a fine shooter. I know him and Trae struggled when defenses picked them up halfcourt and they took a lot of shots off the dribble, but they are both big time shot makers.
I mean I wouldn't rule out adding Ayton, Doncic or Young just because they shot below NBA league avg from 3 because I think they can can get there....Doncic and Young especially will benefit from so much more spacing and less defensive attention.
I'm talking about free agency here in the free agency and trade thread and spending a lot of money on a vet addition.
I think Doncic will be fine too, but it's probably worth mentioning that Trae still shot 5% better on the same number of total attempts in half the games played. In the right situation I could easily see Trae shooting around 40% from 3 on day 1. His ~36% from NBA 3 in college also puts him right around NBA league average for this year.
Not trying to discredit Luka, I just think Trae shouldn't be looped into the guys that have questions about their NBA range.

JMac1 wrote:
Straight truth. The players know exactly what they are gonna do. Dumb JR already told everyone that Lebron was going to LAL. He and Paul George are already teaming up. Like it has been mentioned, I don't think James cares all that much about winning and its about his kids and quality of life. There is no place better in America to be filthy rich than LA.
Saberestar wrote:Fo-Real wrote:DarkHawk wrote:
The problem with Warren is:
Not the greatest defender (though he's improved)
Can't shoot the 3 (this will likely never come if it hasn't already).
He's making 12mil a year. Not a terrible number, but that's starter money and he likely won't be a starter much longer.
If there's a deal for a player like Kemba or a deal that nets us Luka, moving Warren shouldn't be the hold-up IMO.
Also those problems make him more valuable to us than others. He is not going to tip the scales on any deal because to us he is worth more than his 12 mil easily, but to others he is about right at that. Makes trading him just academic rather than helpful. Might as well keep him.
I agree and I want to add that he has never played for $12M per year yet.
His new contract starts next season, his production has always been under rookie's contract.
This is kind of a tough question. It's a better deal than a lot of the contracts handed out a couple summers ago but I'm not sure he would have got that deal as a RFA this summer. Its a very tight market and he's kind of an odd fit on some teams.Fo-Real wrote:Saberestar wrote:Fo-Real wrote:
Also those problems make him more valuable to us than others. He is not going to tip the scales on any deal because to us he is worth more than his 12 mil easily, but to others he is about right at that. Makes trading him just academic rather than helpful. Might as well keep him.
I agree and I want to add that he has never played for $12M per year yet.
His new contract starts next season, his production has always been under rookie's contract.
But you agree that going forward that he is well worth his 12 million dollar contract in today's market correct?
WeekapaugGroove wrote:This is kind of a tough question. It's a better deal than a lot of the contracts handed out a couple summers ago but I'm not sure he would have got that deal as a RFA this summer. Its a very tight market and he's kind of an odd fit on some teams.Fo-Real wrote:Saberestar wrote:I agree and I want to add that he has never played for $12M per year yet.
His new contract starts next season, his production has always been under rookie's contract.
But you agree that going forward that he is well worth his 12 million dollar contract in today's market correct?
Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
Fo-Real wrote:Saberestar wrote:Fo-Real wrote:
Also those problems make him more valuable to us than others. He is not going to tip the scales on any deal because to us he is worth more than his 12 mil easily, but to others he is about right at that. Makes trading him just academic rather than helpful. Might as well keep him.
I agree and I want to add that he has never played for $12M per year yet.
His new contract starts next season, his production has always been under rookie's contract.
But you agree that going forward that he is well worth his 12 million dollar contract in today's market correct?

bwgood77 wrote:
Everything already points to him going to the Lakers.


Kerrsed wrote:bwgood77 wrote:GoranTragic wrote:
LEBRON
Everything already points to him going to the Lakers.
I dont know.....i think the Clippers could put a better team around him. Still would be in LA and wouldnt be like every other player going to the Lakers to try to win their 257th title, could be the first guy to do it under the Clippers banner, which in my opinion would do more for his legacy than doing it as a Laker.


carey wrote:It is 2-time, every time.
bwgood77 wrote:JMac1 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
I think we can't afford to bring in people who cannot shoot the 3 above avg at least.
That includes Doncic?
I think Doncic will be a fine shooter. I know him and Trae struggled when defenses picked them up halfcourt and they took a lot of shots off the dribble, but they are both big time shot makers.
I mean I wouldn't rule out adding Ayton, Doncic or Young just because they shot below NBA league avg from 3 because I think they can can get there....Doncic and Young especially will benefit from so much more spacing and less defensive attention.
I'm talking about free agency here in the free agency and trade thread and spending a lot of money on a vet addition.