HotelVitale wrote:Love Holmes and think he's the funnest Sixers to watch after Embiid, but we Sixers fans might have forgotten what a real NBA rotation looks like. Holmes has looked like he deserves a spot in the NBA, but there's a difference between that and being one of the best 20 or so centers on the planet. Holmes has some real flaws and more importantly he now looks like a good not great player; I'd say that him getting 16mpg as a 2nd year player is a good scenario for him, nothing we have to feel bad about.
For comparison's sake, look at someone like Brandan Wright: he's an excellent finisher who also blocks shots and everywhere he's gone he's posted good to great advanced stats--he's very productive and he's a legit wizard around the hoop and on the roll. He's also never averaged more than 19mpg in his 9-year career because he's pretty skinny and doesn't play like a real center and isn't the best option for a full-time anchor. So he ends up being what he is: a nice back-up who can come in and kill it some nights for 25mpg and other nights play a decent 10-12mpg while the starter gets some rest. He's productive when gets time, but good teams prefer to find someone else to be their full-time answer.
I don't even think that Holmes is even a GOOD player. I think that he is basically what he will always be.
He is undersized. I mean he is probably like 6'7 or 6'8, but he is a center. I disagree with the folks who think that he can play the 4.
He is a poor rebounder, and has no offensive skill. He can hit a wide open 3 every once in a while, but he isn't good enough to justify him being on the court to space the floor.
He is aggressive and can dunk the ball and block some shots. I'm not saying that he doesn't deserve to be in the league, but I don't think he will ever deserve 20 mpg.
If he and Embiid were the only centers on the roster I would argue that we would need to find another to supplement them because he can be relied on to cover for Embiid when he is out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk