flintsky21 wrote:Doncic has that "basketball prodigy" feel in him for what it's worth and so I'd be picking him 1.
rUBIO had that feel
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
flintsky21 wrote:Doncic has that "basketball prodigy" feel in him for what it's worth and so I'd be picking him 1.
Ballerhogger wrote:Suns need a young big they have brooker .
7thshield wrote:Ballerhogger wrote:Suns need a young big they have brooker .
Who brooker?
KHRICH wrote:flintsky21 wrote:Doncic has that "basketball prodigy" feel in him for what it's worth and so I'd be picking him 1.
rUBIO had that feel
flintsky21 wrote:Doncic has that "basketball prodigy" feel in him for what it's worth and so I'd be picking him 1.
flintsky21 wrote:KHRICH wrote:flintsky21 wrote:Doncic has that "basketball prodigy" feel in him for what it's worth and so I'd be picking him 1.
rUBIO had that feel
Agreed. Now imagine if Rubio is 4 inches taller and can shoot.
iggymcfrack wrote:flintsky21 wrote:KHRICH wrote:rUBIO had that feel
Agreed. Now imagine if Rubio is 4 inches taller and can shoot.
The year before declaring for the NBA draft, a 20-year old Rubio averaged 6/3/4 in Europe on .324/.252/.797 splits.
The year before declaring for the draft, a 18/19-year old Doncic averaged 15/5/5 in Europe on .456/.309/.801 splits.
I don't really see these two as being comparable at all. Ayton over Doncic is going to be this generation's Bowie over Jordan.
NoBias wrote:iggymcfrack wrote:flintsky21 wrote:Agreed. Now imagine if Rubio is 4 inches taller and can shoot.
The year before declaring for the NBA draft, a 20-year old Rubio averaged 6/3/4 in Europe on .324/.252/.797 splits.
The year before declaring for the draft, a 18/19-year old Doncic averaged 15/5/5 in Europe on .456/.309/.801 splits.
I don't really see these two as being comparable at all. Ayton over Doncic is going to be this generation's Bowie over Jordan.
Hes not comparing their skill sets. Its the hype. Almost every European who had been hyped didnt necessarily fail in the NBA. but werent as good as their hype alluded them to be. Notice how most European who was picked later in the draft became great as opposed to the ones chosen early? Of course theres some outliers, but its not the norm.
ubernathan wrote:You gotta take Mo Bamba. You can't teach that size and length.
contestedlayups wrote:No you're not the only one. Bamba's ceiling is sky high, and I think he can reach it. Not a knock on Ayton though, as Ayton will get the offense run through him from day one. Doncic is going to be awesome, but I think he's scared away a bunch of teams due to his buyout clause and the need for many of these high lottery teams to select a player that can contribute right away. Rather than potentially stashing a player like Doncic that could wind up not coming to the NBA for a couple years like Rubio or Mirotic, I think his slide on recent draft boards is due to things outside of his basketball skill which is a shame.
Which player projects the best is a complete toss up, much more so than many drafts in previous years. It's all about fit, and if the correct team selects the player that fits their style nad culture best, then many of these high level prospects can thrive.
NoBias wrote:iggymcfrack wrote:flintsky21 wrote:Agreed. Now imagine if Rubio is 4 inches taller and can shoot.
The year before declaring for the NBA draft, a 20-year old Rubio averaged 6/3/4 in Europe on .324/.252/.797 splits.
The year before declaring for the draft, a 18/19-year old Doncic averaged 15/5/5 in Europe on .456/.309/.801 splits.
I don't really see these two as being comparable at all. Ayton over Doncic is going to be this generation's Bowie over Jordan.
Hes not comparing their skill sets. Its the hype. Almost every European who had been hyped didnt necessarily fail in the NBA. but werent as good as their hype alluded them to be. Notice how most European who was picked later in the draft became great as opposed to the ones chosen early? Of course theres some outliers, but its not the norm.
Pachinko_ wrote:NoBias wrote:iggymcfrack wrote:
The year before declaring for the NBA draft, a 20-year old Rubio averaged 6/3/4 in Europe on .324/.252/.797 splits.
The year before declaring for the draft, a 18/19-year old Doncic averaged 15/5/5 in Europe on .456/.309/.801 splits.
I don't really see these two as being comparable at all. Ayton over Doncic is going to be this generation's Bowie over Jordan.
Hes not comparing their skill sets. Its the hype. Almost every European who had been hyped didnt necessarily fail in the NBA. but werent as good as their hype alluded them to be. Notice how most European who was picked later in the draft became great as opposed to the ones chosen early? Of course theres some outliers, but its not the norm.
Yeah well that's why they call it hype, the definition of hype is "extravagant or intensive publicity or promotion, often exaggerating benefits". Hyper-excess-hyperbole.
But thankfully we have gone to school, we can read numbers, and we can use them to make our own assessments.
OrangeBlueSkies wrote:I know it’s not an easy question... but am I the only one who thinks Mo Bamba will be better than Ayton?
KHRICH wrote:... Jesus christ people are sensitive noone said hes not skilled or different he made a comment about prodigy and I stated rubio was called that as well. It is that simple.