stuporman wrote:WajaBawl wrote:stuporman wrote:
So you know for sure that those 3 teams are taking back the contract in the process or are you just talking out of your ass? A salary that constitutes about 25% of the whole cap that is dead money, all 3 of them are willing to swallow it?
It's a simple question I'm asking about the contract and if they want to trade it without the contract, there will be many more teams interested in it.
I'm not the one talking out of my ass here buddy. They are fine with keeping the pick and getting a top prospect. It's pretty damn obvious that the contract has to be included in any sort of trade discussions. Don't really know where you're getting at here.
That's their choice if they want but I asked how many teams are willing to eat the contract and offer a top 10 pick, you acted as if you knew what's being said in those phone calls and which teams are taking the contract. You don't, "buddy".

the grizzlies would be insane to trade the 4th pick in this draft
however they have a ton of pressure we dont
they have a high payroll, an aging team of guys like conley and gasol, and a low turnout equalling a team that doesn't even break even in cost.
Parsons must be a nightmare for them.
that said if they have any serious intention of winning with Conley and Gasol they need to keep that pick
but Im more than happy to eat any contract we have to to get it
Ill take parsons and 4 for thomas, lee, 36 and cash. Id package 4 and Mudiay or Burke and a 2nd next year or whatever for 2 and let the kings get Porter and us get Luca
hold frank if we can, hold the 9th if we can, get luca if we can, and most of all hold future picks if we can
pick luca and Knox and we have a new team