johnnyvann840 wrote:Houston_Bulls wrote:johnnyvann840 wrote:I don't know why people keep talking about a 1+1 deal or things like this. Here's what is going to happen. We have already heard this from Paxson. Three times in the last month he's said it. Bulls are going to let Zach go out and get an offer. That offer sheet has to be for 3 years at least. Rule. Then, he will come back with his best offer and the Bulls will either match the offer or say goodbye to Zach. That's it. There won't be any preemptive offer from the Bulls for anything close to $20M per year as some are suggesting. That would be pure idiocy. If nobody offers more than $15M per year for 3 or 4 years, the Bulls probably match and it's probably a good gamble. Worst case is we have a tradeable contract that should be fairly easy to move.
I wouldn't spend 15% of the cap on a guy who's likely upside is good sixth man. I wouldn't spend 45 million on the 3% chance that he morphs into CJ McCollum or Bradley Beal.
I'm with you all the way on this.
Personally, I would let him walk for anything more than $8M per year. I know that is unrealistic, so I guess the number is more like $14M, which for the level of player he is and the impact he has is a GROSS overpay. Look, we aren't paying for him to win the dunk contest, or to be the highest jumper. We want winning basketball players. Players that help you on the scoreboard and not just on highlight reels.
ESPN has LaVine as the 19th Best Free Agent.
That's like Tony Snell territory, who got 4y/46M last year.
Apparently there is even less FA money out there this year, maybe 4y/45M is actually doable.
If the market does dry up, it would be savvy of LaVine to invest in himself and take the QO.
Maybe the Bulls get lucky and leverage a guy who needs some money now in a dry market after an underwhelming year.