vincecarter4pres wrote:steady wrote:Lakers situation is so weird this off season.  Either they will have LeBron James and Kawhi Leonard, which would be an unheard of windfall, or they will have nothing.  
I think the latter is more likely because they cannot put together a trade package that comes close to what Celtics, Sixers etc can offer, and I think teams are probably a lot less worried Kawhi will be a one year rental than before
Idk about either of these tbh.
Ingram is a true blue chip prospect. Unless Boston would come up off Tatum or both the Memphis and Sacto picks with Brown, I like the Lakers package best if it's Ingram and picks, especially if Kuzma is also included.
And I do think teams are still nervous on Kawhi bouncing next summer and will be hesitant to give up that kind of value.
 
You're right.  Although BOS has the better assets, what they have, and what they are willing to put on the table are different things.  LAL are more desperate.  If they put down Ingram, Kuzma and a couple of future first round picks that were only lightly protected, for example, it could be enough.  
But the whole situation for LAL seems sad to me because even if they got what they wanted, LeBron just does not have that many years left, the LAL supporting cast is very green, and whether LeBron - Kawhi will have chemistry also seems a big question mark to me .  
I am not a fan of super teams in general, but this one in particular feels ill fated to me.
Edit - Kawhi to Celtics is trade that makes sense for both parties.  But it sounds like Ainge is negotiating hard.  "The Celtics, however, are operating with extreme caution due to Leonard's health issues and apparent free agent desires. The Celtics are not interested in making a risky trade for Leonard." .... 
I don't buy this.  Kyrie had health issues and expressed FA desires to play elsewhere too. Kawhi when healthy is clearly better than Kyrie. 
this sounds like the opening gambit in the Celtics negotiating dance with Spurs, ... this could take weeks.