GeraldsGreenery wrote:Finally some clarity
Who is tweeted that? Never heard of him
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
GeraldsGreenery wrote:Finally some clarity
AtheJ415 wrote:BobbieL wrote:ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
The Cavs went after him whenever he was on the floor in the playoffs. It's the problem you face with even great defensive small guards - can't recover to shooters, can't handle big wings on a switch. But then again, there aren't a ton of PGs out there that don't have this problem (but see Holliday, Smart), and for the most part, they try to compensate with great outside shooting (see Curry, Collinson, VanVleet).
For the reasons you list about Van Fleet, Collison, smaller PGs - Suns have to at least make a call to Smart. I get the shot - what 30% ---its pretty bad. But the defense is there, floor general stuff or was that Stevens. Still , worth a call
Beverly - truly the best target next to Booker. Wonder what the Clippers would take. One year deal - but he would be ideal.
It's not just pretty bad. It is the worst shot for a PG in 30 years. Modern basketball has not seen a worse shooting PG. Not just that but his passing is not great and neither are his turnovers, so yeah, he's a disaster on offense.
VanVleet is a really good defender. The gap between his defense and Smart's is not what you would think, although Smart is obviously fantastic on that end. Meanwhile, the gap between the 2 offensively is enormous.
AtheJ415 wrote:Maze wrote:I don't understand the VanVleet love.I was listening to 98.7 yesterday, and one of the host was gushing about this guy.Went and looked up his stats.....8 pts 3 assist and 42% FG
That's not all that impressive.His 3pt numbers look good, but still.What am I missing here?
The advanced stats. So while he isn't a physical specimen by any means he is a great positional defender and thus rates really well on that end, combined with the 41% 3 point shooting. He is also super heady, so he doesn't turn the ball over. So basically, you have an elite 3 point shooter with good to great defense and low turnovers. He nearly won 6th man of the year last year.
I don't know if he can be the starter. I think if we got him he would start because he is clearly better than our other options, but he probably is best positioned to be an elite 6th man or 5th wheel starter. He works for our purposes though. Whether it is a good signing or not would depend on the price. We'd still have to hope Okobo turns into the starter long-term imo.
Sunsdeuce wrote:GeraldsGreenery wrote:Finally some clarity
Who is tweeted that? Never heard of him
Sunsdeuce wrote:GeraldsGreenery wrote:Finally some clarity
Who is tweeted that? Never heard of him
AtheJ415 wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:The kings are weird so who knows but he seems like a horrid horrid fit with Bagley. Not sure how those two could be on the court at the same time. Might be the worst defensive front court ever assembled.DarkHawk wrote:
This probably is more about what-ifs. I don't think he's a real option for us. Especially with Warren on the roster. I hope he goes to the Kings are rumored. They could use a scorer like him.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
If the Kings start a frontcourt of Bagley and Parker I will make them mandatory viewing on league pass just to laugh at the defense played by those 2.
AtheJ415 wrote:Maze wrote:I don't understand the VanVleet love.I was listening to 98.7 yesterday, and one of the host was gushing about this guy.Went and looked up his stats.....8 pts 3 assist and 42% FG
That's not all that impressive.His 3pt numbers look good, but still.What am I missing here?
The advanced stats. So while he isn't a physical specimen by any means he is a great positional defender and thus rates really well on that end, combined with the 41% 3 point shooting. He is also super heady, so he doesn't turn the ball over. So basically, you have an elite 3 point shooter with good to great defense and low turnovers. He nearly won 6th man of the year last year.
I don't know if he can be the starter. I think if we got him he would start because he is clearly better than our other options, but he probably is best positioned to be an elite 6th man or 5th wheel starter. He works for our purposes though. Whether it is a good signing or not would depend on the price. We'd still have to hope Okobo turns into the starter long-term imo.
Revived wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:The kings are weird so who knows but he seems like a horrid horrid fit with Bagley. Not sure how those two could be on the court at the same time. Might be the worst defensive front court ever assembled.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
If the Kings start a frontcourt of Bagley and Parker I will make them mandatory viewing on league pass just to laugh at the defense played by those 2.
Kings plan to start Giles who projects to be a defensive menace.
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:Maze wrote:I don't understand the VanVleet love.I was listening to 98.7 yesterday, and one of the host was gushing about this guy.Went and looked up his stats.....8 pts 3 assist and 42% FG
That's not all that impressive.His 3pt numbers look good, but still.What am I missing here?
The advanced stats. So while he isn't a physical specimen by any means he is a great positional defender and thus rates really well on that end, combined with the 41% 3 point shooting. He is also super heady, so he doesn't turn the ball over. So basically, you have an elite 3 point shooter with good to great defense and low turnovers. He nearly won 6th man of the year last year.
I don't know if he can be the starter. I think if we got him he would start because he is clearly better than our other options, but he probably is best positioned to be an elite 6th man or 5th wheel starter. He works for our purposes though. Whether it is a good signing or not would depend on the price. We'd still have to hope Okobo turns into the starter long-term imo.
VanVleet had the benefit of playing with a lot of solid defenders (i.e., not a lot of time on the court with Val), most teams don't tailor their game plans to each matchup, and most teams don't have enough talent to really exploit the occasional shorty on any given night.
Things change in the playoffs, though. At even money, Smart >>> VanVleet, easy call. But the money won't be even, because NBA GM's aren't fools.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Blonde wrote:I’d be interested in signing Noel and having him back up Ayton. He can be a huge defensive presence. Let Chandler ride the pine for his final year. The Rich Paul factor probably forecloses this option but it seems low risk high reward.
BobbieL wrote:ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:
The advanced stats. So while he isn't a physical specimen by any means he is a great positional defender and thus rates really well on that end, combined with the 41% 3 point shooting. He is also super heady, so he doesn't turn the ball over. So basically, you have an elite 3 point shooter with good to great defense and low turnovers. He nearly won 6th man of the year last year.
I don't know if he can be the starter. I think if we got him he would start because he is clearly better than our other options, but he probably is best positioned to be an elite 6th man or 5th wheel starter. He works for our purposes though. Whether it is a good signing or not would depend on the price. We'd still have to hope Okobo turns into the starter long-term imo.
VanVleet had the benefit of playing with a lot of solid defenders (i.e., not a lot of time on the court with Val), most teams don't tailor their game plans to each matchup, and most teams don't have enough talent to really exploit the occasional shorty on any given night.
Things change in the playoffs, though. At even money, Smart >>> VanVleet, easy call. But the money won't be even, because NBA GM's aren't fools.
So, based on your assessment of Smart - what Stretch 4 makes sense - a more offense oriented or would Mbah Moute still work. Suns aren't getting say Ariza and Smart unless deals are TRULY a lot less or the Suns make a trade moving say Daniels and Chriss for instance to get 6m more cap space.
Besides Sacrament and Philadelphia, some other teams that have surfaced as potential landing spots for Parker Chicago, Utah, Indiana, Atlanta, Phoenix and Brooklyn. The latter team has been quite active in free agency in recent years, including having extended a max offer to small forward Otto Porter, which Washington matched. The Nets also made a huge offer to guard Tyler Johnson, which Miami matched.
NTB wrote: