Magic_Johnny12 wrote:bondom34 wrote:tiderulz wrote:it kinda is in NBA life. depending on the role.
Lowry, Hill, Horford, Chris Paul, Millsap, Ariza, Redick Iggy, both Gasols, Korver,Anu, Dirk are all as old or older. Orlando's current starter is a year younger and far worse.
And Dragic has at most two years left, he's almost assured to be very productive throughout this contract.
Again, not worth trading for and giving any substantial assets for. He simply doesn’t fit our timeline. I wouldn’t want Orlando to trade for any of the players you mentioned above. Us not signing IT is a perfect example of what I mean.
Nothing against Dragic, but his best days are surely behind him.
Never understood this mindset. It's also prevalent on the Knicks board. I'm of the opinion that even if a team is going with the youth movement, they still need a vet or two to pass on experience and work ethic. They're important for teaching the tricks of the trade. Having a 32 year old Dragic help take pressure off of your youngins helps them develop and improves your team overall.
But you seem to be really picky in what you want for a point guard. If simply for the expiring contracts and no other assets involved, no way to get anything you might deem "ideal."

















+
= 



