ImageImageImage

Bullock

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,257
And1: 5,245
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Bullock 

Post#21 » by Kilo » Thu Jul 19, 2018 1:28 am

Actually to correct misinformation I was passing on - We have Bullock's Full Bird Rights still it seems. He signed a two year contract here but since we were re-signing him after we traded for him coming off a three year+ contract he have his FBR even after pulling his QO and making him a UFA - doing that doesn't void Bird Rights. What we don't have is the right to match an offersheet anymore as he is a UFA again, but we can offer any amount over and above to keep him.

So we'd also be trading his Bird Rights if we did move him.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
Billl
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,212
And1: 3,348
Joined: Sep 06, 2013

Re: Bullock 

Post#22 » by Billl » Thu Jul 19, 2018 1:40 pm

Not sure why people are thinking Bullock is going to sign a big contract. Realistically, he's the type of guy that any team would be happy to have ..... on the bench. The free agent market hasn't been particularly kind to those sort of players recently. Most of those guys are getting 1-2 year deals and most are at a fraction of the MLE.
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Bullock 

Post#23 » by The Penguin » Thu Jul 19, 2018 1:45 pm

Billl wrote:Not sure why people are thinking Bullock is going to sign a big contract. Realistically, he's the type of guy that any team would be happy to have ..... on the bench. The free agent market hasn't been particularly kind to those sort of players recently. Most of those guys are getting 1-2 year deals and most are at a fraction of the MLE.



Probably because they saw the old FO give $8 mil to guys who can't play at all and figure a guy who can play, even if it's limited, will cost $12 mil.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Bullock 

Post#24 » by MotownMadness » Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:45 pm

The Penguin wrote:
Billl wrote:Not sure why people are thinking Bullock is going to sign a big contract. Realistically, he's the type of guy that any team would be happy to have ..... on the bench. The free agent market hasn't been particularly kind to those sort of players recently. Most of those guys are getting 1-2 year deals and most are at a fraction of the MLE.



Probably because they saw the old FO give $8 mil to guys who can't play at all and figure a guy who can play, even if it's limited, will cost $12 mil.

Bullock should come on a decent contract. There’s going to be a ton of big FA and probably not enough money league wide like we saw somewhat this offseason.
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Bullock 

Post#25 » by The Penguin » Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:13 pm

MotownMadness wrote:
The Penguin wrote:
Billl wrote:Not sure why people are thinking Bullock is going to sign a big contract. Realistically, he's the type of guy that any team would be happy to have ..... on the bench. The free agent market hasn't been particularly kind to those sort of players recently. Most of those guys are getting 1-2 year deals and most are at a fraction of the MLE.



Probably because they saw the old FO give $8 mil to guys who can't play at all and figure a guy who can play, even if it's limited, will cost $12 mil.

Bullock should come on a decent contract. There’s going to be a ton of big FA and probably not enough money league wide like we saw somewhat this offseason.



Timing is going to be brutal.

It'll be interesting to see how teams spend this summer and next. There's a mini bump to the cap coming up and the terrible deals from 2016 begin to wash off this summer, and are all but gone next summer. A lot of teams are setting themselves up for cap room. Will they learn from 2016 (one would hope...) or are they going to be dropping crazy money all over again when they get a hint of space.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,340
And1: 19,166
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Bullock 

Post#26 » by ThunderBolt » Tue Aug 14, 2018 1:19 am

His game is exactly what the thunder need. Coming up with a trade that works for both sides isnt easy.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Bullock 

Post#27 » by vege » Tue Aug 14, 2018 11:20 am

Knrstz wrote:His game is exactly what the thunder need. Coming up with a trade that works for both sides isnt easy.


He is exactly what any team need nowadays. Low usage guy, excellent 3 point shooter, plus defender. All 30 teams could use him, and he is making only 2.5 mil.

Only way OKC acquire him is if he is part of a package for either Westbrook or George.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,257
And1: 5,245
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Bullock 

Post#28 » by Kilo » Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:12 pm

vege wrote:
Knrstz wrote:His game is exactly what the thunder need. Coming up with a trade that works for both sides isnt easy.


He is exactly what any team need nowadays. Low usage guy, excellent 3 point shooter, plus defender. All 30 teams could use him, and he is making only 2.5 mil.

Only way OKC acquire him is if he is part of a package for either Westbrook or George.


:o :crazy:
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
User avatar
whitehops
General Manager
Posts: 8,300
And1: 7,003
Joined: Dec 12, 2012
Location: Toronto
     

Re: Bullock 

Post#29 » by whitehops » Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:01 pm

i actually thought that he would be an amazing ariza replacement for houston. obviously not quite the defender ariza is but is a deadly shooter and makes peanuts which helps because they don't have a lot of cap space.

that said, i'm very glad we have him. we desperately need his shooting and movement off-ball. a lineup i'm really looking forward to seeing is jackson-kennard-bullock-griffin-drummond. tons of opportunities to create between jackson and blake with drummond setting screens and being a lob target with two great shooter flanking the wings.
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Bullock 

Post#30 » by DBC10 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:21 pm

Dude is basically Anthony Morrow, nothing great, but a sharpshooter that can get you bench points occasionally. Though, I like having him around too.

I really doubt he's going to get overpaid. There's going to be a lot of FAs coming up.
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: Bullock 

Post#31 » by Spider156 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 11:58 pm

The Penguin wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:
The Penguin wrote:

Probably because they saw the old FO give $8 mil to guys who can't play at all and figure a guy who can play, even if it's limited, will cost $12 mil.

Bullock should come on a decent contract. There’s going to be a ton of big FA and probably not enough money league wide like we saw somewhat this offseason.



Timing is going to be brutal.

It'll be interesting to see how teams spend this summer and next. There's a mini bump to the cap coming up and the terrible deals from 2016 begin to wash off this summer, and are all but gone next summer. A lot of teams are setting themselves up for cap room. Will they learn from 2016 (one would hope...) or are they going to be dropping crazy money all over again when they get a hint of space.

No they won't "learn" and I put that in quotation marks because it's not about a lesson. FA is simply that competitive and teams will outright overpay any player they really want which will 100% happen. Us? We'd pay BIG money to any FA to come here which is why I don't understand people and their love for cap space. Nobody comes to Detroit in FA. Gotta trade for them.
Defense wins championships
ByeByeDre
Rookie
Posts: 1,227
And1: 373
Joined: Apr 20, 2017

Re: Bullock 

Post#32 » by ByeByeDre » Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:41 am

Spider156 wrote: Nobody comes to Detroit in FA. Gotta trade for them.


Gotta have assets to trade, not terrible FA contracts. We’re light on assets, heavy on garbage contracts
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: Bullock 

Post#33 » by Spider156 » Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:58 am

ByeByeDre wrote:
Spider156 wrote: Nobody comes to Detroit in FA. Gotta trade for them.


Gotta have assets to trade, not terrible FA contracts. We’re light on assets, heavy on garbage contracts

Yeah cuz we just turned in assets for a FA basically. Another year and we've got good expiring contracts to trade. Also I don't believe we're done dealing. I think we're gonna get assets when players play like Jackson becomes an asset if he shows he can be healthy for half a season until he gets traded. We also have our FRP for next season. If we get a good offer for another star player, I'd give it up again.
Defense wins championships
Moses ShamMoses
Analyst
Posts: 3,551
And1: 1,463
Joined: Nov 28, 2012
   

Re: Bullock 

Post#34 » by Moses ShamMoses » Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:22 pm

If he can continue his production of 15 ppg on 45%+ FG 40%+ 3P as a starter, I could see him getting a contract similar to Avery Bradley's at 12 per year.
Jeff Van Gundy on his brother's Pistons: 'He took over the Titanic and it's sinking even quicker'
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 1,997
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Bullock 

Post#35 » by Canadafan » Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:46 pm

Moses ShamMoses wrote:If he can continue his production of 15 ppg on 45%+ FG 40%+ 3P as a starter, I could see him getting a contract similar to Avery Bradley's at 12 per year.


Those stats seem optimistic. I'd be ecstatic though!
So how does this work? Hoebmuch can we afford to give him nectar summer? Just MLE?
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Bullock 

Post#36 » by vege » Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:32 pm

DBC10 wrote:Dude is basically Anthony Morrow, nothing great, but a sharpshooter that can get you bench points occasionally. Though, I like having him around too.

I really doubt he's going to get overpaid. There's going to be a lot of FAs coming up.


Yeah right. If you ignore the fact that he is a plus defender and Morrow was a laughable defender.
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Bullock 

Post#37 » by vege » Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:35 pm

Canadafan wrote:
Moses ShamMoses wrote:If he can continue his production of 15 ppg on 45%+ FG 40%+ 3P as a starter, I could see him getting a contract similar to Avery Bradley's at 12 per year.


Those stats seem optimistic. I'd be ecstatic though!
So how does this work? Hoebmuch can we afford to give him nectar summer? Just MLE?


Nope. We actually have his bird rights If I'm not mistaken, so we can offer him whatever we want, unless we are hard capped.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 1,997
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Bullock 

Post#38 » by Canadafan » Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:48 pm

vege wrote:
Canadafan wrote:
Moses ShamMoses wrote:If he can continue his production of 15 ppg on 45%+ FG 40%+ 3P as a starter, I could see him getting a contract similar to Avery Bradley's at 12 per year.


Those stats seem optimistic. I'd be ecstatic though!
So how does this work? Hoebmuch can we afford to give him nectar summer? Just MLE?


Nope. We actually have his bird rights If I'm not mistaken, so we can offer him whatever we want, unless we are hard capped.



Lmao "give him nectar". Stupid auto correct hahaha.
Thanks for the reply. I hope youre right. For some reason I thought we didn't have bird rights.
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Bullock 

Post#39 » by vege » Wed Aug 15, 2018 10:13 pm

Canadafan wrote:
vege wrote:
Canadafan wrote:
Those stats seem optimistic. I'd be ecstatic though!
So how does this work? Hoebmuch can we afford to give him nectar summer? Just MLE?


Nope. We actually have his bird rights If I'm not mistaken, so we can offer him whatever we want, unless we are hard capped.



Lmao "give him nectar". Stupid auto correct hahaha.
Thanks for the reply. I hope youre right. For some reason I thought we didn't have bird rights.


I thought so too, since we signed him to a 2 years contract, but we had him under contract before, I may be wrong, but if we have him under contract for 3+ years we have his full bird rights.

Return to Detroit Pistons