Pointgod wrote:TGW wrote:Pointgod wrote:
You guys are arguing with a rabid anti Clinton and anti Democratic party whacko. When after he's been pointed out where he's wrong from his own article he just ignores it and makes up his own facts. This is what happens when you take people like Glen Greenwald as gospel.
And you're a rabid hillary whore. You watch conspiracy theorists like Rachel Maddow, who's a running joke btw, and take her nonsense as gospel. You're as much a partisan hack as a loyalist Trump supporter. Unlike you and the other hillary whores, I don't wave pompoms like a brainwashed moron for a candidate. I support POLICIES, period. If you're part of the DC swamp, I don't care if you're a D or an R...GTFO!
Awww you're so adorable when you try to be a tough guy. First of all I'm a neutral observer who's not even American so your insane obsession with calling me some Hillary supporter just shows how reactionary you are. Plus I'm on your of the political spectrum since I live in a socialist country that you want to emulate. I'm just call things like I see them and rely on actual facts and evidence instead of pre established biases. Fact is Hillary was the most qualified candidate running and got screwed our of the Presidency by a combination of Russia and Comey. Another fact is that Bernie wasn't screwed out of the primaries he just ran a poor campaign and went up against a more recognised politician. Another fact is that only a complete moron would think the way to get Progressive policies passed is to have a divided Democratic party and let Republicans win. Finally I realize that the idea of a Socialist paradise is way down the line. Americans as a whole are too selfish and individualistic to accept the type of sacrifices and changes that come with implementing more Progressive policies. That's why a lot of Bernies ideas while well intentioned aren't completely honest about the costs that are required to implement these programs.
Wait...so you live in a socialist country? Which one? and why is it so good that we should want that in the USA? I mean do you have wealthy oligarchs...well tell me the country...i gotta see this. I'll do my own research.
I mean, here's the thing...isn't the point of socialism to redistribute the wealth? Like take the money from the uber wealthy aholes? Thats the point right? And I am on board with that...but if socialism is just a guise tom completely kill off the upwardly mobile middle class than count me the eff out!! I want a world where the uber wealthy dont exist and their money is redistributed....but i also want a world where harder workers and/or smarter or more talented workers can make more money.
there has to be tiers of income based on the jobs market place, IMO. just not at out of control wealth disparity.
for example...I would accept an income bracket something like;
top entertainers and top CEO's: 2-5 million per year given that they work at least 25 hours per week.
Top professional: 1-2 million
Top small business owners: 2-5 million
average pros: 100K-300K
average-top skilled emplowyees: 40K-80K
unkilled-low skilled: 25K-40K
and i think on the lower end this is what we basically have today. the problem is at the high end salaries are much bigger than above.
and of course corp profits are entirely out of control.
like i said, its a full rebuild.