ImageImage

ATL - Week 1 Lead Up

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,902
And1: 16,579
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#101 » by humanrefutation » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:06 pm

Well, the Bears topped our offer for him, even if we offered two firsts. I'm still surprised that a team gave up two firsts, and the Bears are a weird choice because they're still, at best, the third best team in this division with Mack.

But whatevs. I'm just glad he didn't go to a contender.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,761
And1: 27,335
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#102 » by trwi7 » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:07 pm

Really not a need for a FB in today's game no matter how much McCarthy wants one.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 21,506
And1: 7,886
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#103 » by Susan » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:10 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:
RiotPunch wrote:But seriously, do the Bears really think they even have a decent chance of making the playoffs? So stupid for a bad team to give value like that for a guy in his prime about to get a record payday. They're still going to be bad and now they won't pick next year until the 3rd round.

The value only ever made sense for a contending team. McKenzie fleeced Chicago.

It's going to be a lot of pressure on Trubisky, if he really sucks then they will probably look dumb for doing this. If he's their guy at QB then I disagree with you. Mack warrants an exception to conventional wisdom imo.


Bears fan coming in peace!

In looking at how differently they're building around Mitch vs how they built around Cutler I feel like there's significantly less pressure on Mitch than there was on Jay. They literally surrounded Jay with nothing outside of Forte, gave him multiple offense coordinators over the years and even traded Greg Olsen because he didn't fit with Martz.

Mitch has Howard/Cohen at RB, an offensive HC and we'll see what's up with Mark Helfrich as an OC in the NFL. At WR/TE they've put in a lot of work over the past 2 off-seasons and they're going to go from easily the worst WR core in the NFL to having A-Rob, Gabriel, Anthony Miller (you guys are going to hate this guy, he's going to be a star), Trey Burton, Shaheen and even Kevin White showed something this preseason.

Having an elite defense + high end running game + plenty of playmakers on the offensive side of the ball will really help Mitch ease into being a franchise QB. Having him on his rookie deal sets us up to make a move like this to go all in.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,013
And1: 55,594
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#104 » by MickeyDavis » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:11 pm

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,013
And1: 55,594
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#105 » by MickeyDavis » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:13 pm

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,937
And1: 4,994
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#106 » by RRyder823 » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:15 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:Sounds like Davante thought Mack was headed north

That's how I interpreted that, makes it seems like maybe the Packers thought they were going to pull it off which makes it sting just a bit more.
Two first round picks plus a player for the right to pay him 24 million?

With that as the price I applaud Chicago for outbidding Gute and saving him from himself

Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,937
And1: 4,994
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#107 » by RRyder823 » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:18 pm

Susan wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:
RiotPunch wrote:But seriously, do the Bears really think they even have a decent chance of making the playoffs? So stupid for a bad team to give value like that for a guy in his prime about to get a record payday. They're still going to be bad and now they won't pick next year until the 3rd round.

The value only ever made sense for a contending team. McKenzie fleeced Chicago.

It's going to be a lot of pressure on Trubisky, if he really sucks then they will probably look dumb for doing this. If he's their guy at QB then I disagree with you. Mack warrants an exception to conventional wisdom imo.


Bears fan coming in peace!

In looking at how differently they're building around Mitch vs how they built around Cutler I feel like there's significantly less pressure on Mitch than there was on Jay. They literally surrounded Jay with nothing outside of Forte, gave him multiple offense coordinators over the years and even traded Greg Olsen because he didn't fit with Martz.

Mitch has Howard/Cohen at RB, an offensive HC and we'll see what's up with Mark Helfrich as an OC in the NFL. At WR/TE they've put in a lot of work over the past 2 off-seasons and they're going to go from easily the worst WR core in the NFL to having A-Rob, Gabriel, Anthony Miller (you guys are going to hate this guy, he's going to be a star), Trey Burton, Shaheen and even Kevin White showed something this preseason.

Having an elite defense + high end running game + plenty of playmakers on the offensive side of the ball will really help Mitch ease into being a franchise QB. Having him on his rookie deal sets us up to make a move like this to go all in.


But should you guys be even looking at going "all in" right now?


Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,013
And1: 55,594
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#108 » by MickeyDavis » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:18 pm

Reports are Mack will get more than Donald. Glad it didn't happen for us.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,761
And1: 27,335
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#109 » by trwi7 » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:20 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:
Read on Twitter


I Zombo. You Zombo. He/She/Me Zombo. Zombo. Zomboing. Zombology. The study of Zombo. It's 1st grade Mickey.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,447
And1: 11,473
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#110 » by Turk Nowitzki » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:27 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:Sounds like Davante thought Mack was headed north

That's how I interpreted that, makes it seems like maybe the Packers thought they were going to pull it off which makes it sting just a bit more.
Two first round picks plus a player for the right to pay him 24 million?

With that as the price I applaud Chicago for outbidding Gute and saving him from himself

Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app

We'll see about who the player is, I haven't seen any real confirmation of that online.

I guess I don't get the hang up on the picks or the money (unless it was actually impossible for us to pay him that much, not a much of a cap guru). What are the chances that two likely late first round picks are going to make a greater impact over the next few years than Khalil Mack? Incredibly unlikely in my view. I don't know maybe something just snapped finally but I'm tired of playing it safe.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,761
And1: 27,335
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#111 » by trwi7 » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:28 pm

Has Ahmad Thomas been mentioned among the cuts?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,447
And1: 11,473
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#112 » by Turk Nowitzki » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:28 pm

trwi7 wrote:Has Ahmad Thomas been mentioned among the cuts?

Not sure if you were asking or mentioning it because it was just reported, but yeah he got cut.
Read on Twitter
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,013
And1: 55,594
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#113 » by MickeyDavis » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:29 pm

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 36,175
And1: 26,532
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#114 » by Matches Malone » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:31 pm

Interesting... thought we'd keep 4 with Oren out for a few weeks.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 21,506
And1: 7,886
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#115 » by Susan » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:35 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
Susan wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:It's going to be a lot of pressure on Trubisky, if he really sucks then they will probably look dumb for doing this. If he's their guy at QB then I disagree with you. Mack warrants an exception to conventional wisdom imo.


Bears fan coming in peace!

In looking at how differently they're building around Mitch vs how they built around Cutler I feel like there's significantly less pressure on Mitch than there was on Jay. They literally surrounded Jay with nothing outside of Forte, gave him multiple offense coordinators over the years and even traded Greg Olsen because he didn't fit with Martz.

Mitch has Howard/Cohen at RB, an offensive HC and we'll see what's up with Mark Helfrich as an OC in the NFL. At WR/TE they've put in a lot of work over the past 2 off-seasons and they're going to go from easily the worst WR core in the NFL to having A-Rob, Gabriel, Anthony Miller (you guys are going to hate this guy, he's going to be a star), Trey Burton, Shaheen and even Kevin White showed something this preseason.

Having an elite defense + high end running game + plenty of playmakers on the offensive side of the ball will really help Mitch ease into being a franchise QB. Having him on his rookie deal sets us up to make a move like this to go all in.


But should you guys be even looking at going "all in" right now?


Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app


We've been your bitches for 10 years now. If you're in a spot to get a constant DPOY candidate in his prime, you go ahead and do it and never look back. Elite pass rushers stay elite for years (look at Peppers still doing his thing in his late 30s), I think this gives us a shot.

The thing I like about Pace is he goes out and gets his guy. In the 2014 draft, Emery was 1 pick away from getting Aaron Donald. We wound up with Kyle Fuller instead. Pace has had 100% conviction on Leonard Floyd, Mitch and Anthony Miller and we'll see if he's right on these guys but I appreciate his conviction.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,937
And1: 4,994
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#116 » by RRyder823 » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:36 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:That's how I interpreted that, makes it seems like maybe the Packers thought they were going to pull it off which makes it sting just a bit more.
Two first round picks plus a player for the right to pay him 24 million?

With that as the price I applaud Chicago for outbidding Gute and saving him from himself

Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app

We'll see about who the player is, I haven't seen any real confirmation of that online.

I guess I don't get the hang up on the picks or the money
(unless it was actually impossible for us to pay him that much, not a much of a cap guru). What are the chances that two likely late first round picks are going to make a greater impact over the next few years than Khalil Mack? Incredibly unlikely in my view.


Really?

Well to lead off 24 million in cap space is generally enough cap for 3 good starting level caliber players. If Gute even lands only a single quality guy in round one that's 4 good starters for the price of acquiring Mack at minimum.

And yes 4 good starters would be better value and greater impact then only having Mack. Not only does it not put all your eggs in one basket but Mack alone doesnt make a pass rush good as we saw last year with the Raiders their pass rush was horrible and that was with Mack.





Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#117 » by Balls2TheWalls » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:36 pm

Ahmad Thomas makes sense as a cut if you have a guy who can play emergency ILB in an injury situation. I think that Clay can move over.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,761
And1: 27,335
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#118 » by trwi7 » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:37 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:
trwi7 wrote:Has Ahmad Thomas been mentioned among the cuts?

Not sure if you were asking or mentioning it because it was just reported, but yeah he got cut.
Read on Twitter


Yeah I have the JS live blog up and I'm not sure if they go in order but I looked at it and saw Ahmad Thomas and thought his name was new. Looks like they go in order just based on when the names were posted here and when they're posted on there.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#119 » by Balls2TheWalls » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:39 pm

Have we cut a receiver yet? It is starting to look like there is a chance we keep 8.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,761
And1: 27,335
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Cutdown to 53 - Packers and NFL - Mack to Bears Pending 

Post#120 » by trwi7 » Sat Sep 1, 2018 5:41 pm

Balls2TheWalls wrote:Have we cut a receiver yet? It is starting to look like there is a chance we keep 8.


Yancey
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.

Return to Green Bay Packers