ImageImageImage

2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,357
And1: 16,994
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1801 » by Saberestar » Tue Sep 4, 2018 12:43 pm

ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:Since everyone's so eager to send out TJ in a deal for a PG, I assume the PG we get back will be a 20 PPG 6 APG caliber player, in the first year of a 4 year deal paying $50 million? And yet all the names I see being bandied about look like 12 PPG 4 APG types.

Some were afraid of seeing Marquese blow up on the Rockets, well.... you send TJ out east and I think he has an outside shot at making the ASG. I realize we've created a huge log jam at the forward spots, but giving up TJ for some mediocre Top 30 PG would be too painful.

I think (and hope) that we are not gonna trade any of Jackson, Warren or Bridges.

All of them are young and under long-term contracts, and can play minutes at multiple positions.

Ariza and Ryno are here JUST for this season. That is why McD was focused on reduce Ryno's salary if waived next season. They are not part of our future. Probably if they love the city, coachs, environment...they can work on an extension with lower salary but I do not expect it.

So I think that we are gonna use players that are not part of our future core (Daniels, Chandler) and/or future picks to get a decent but not big time PG. We can add Melton or Canaan in the trade if the other team needs a PG back.
Waylay13
Rookie
Posts: 1,164
And1: 933
Joined: Apr 10, 2016
 

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1802 » by Waylay13 » Tue Sep 4, 2018 1:35 pm

ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:Since everyone's so eager to send out TJ in a deal for a PG, I assume the PG we get back will be a 20 PPG 6 APG caliber player, in the first year of a 4 year deal paying $50 million? And yet all the names I see being bandied about look like 12 PPG 4 APG types.

Some were afraid of seeing Marquese blow up on the Rockets, well.... you send TJ out east and I think he has an outside shot at making the ASG. I realize we've created a huge log jam at the forward spots, but giving up TJ for some mediocre Top 30 PG would be too painful.


I am confused as to what skills you believe that TJ has that would led him to be traded for a 20 and 6 point guard. He is only a fair defender, a so so rebounder, doesnt pass or create for others and only scores in mid range and at the hoop; in short he is the type of player that in today's NBA has very little value. He may have been our second best player on the worst team in the NBA. To compare him to Cedric Ceballos maybe doing Ced a disservice as Ced was much better rebounder.
Just say no to idiots!!
Fo-Real
General Manager
Posts: 9,779
And1: 5,492
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
     

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1803 » by Fo-Real » Tue Sep 4, 2018 2:12 pm

I think as soon as newly signed players are available to be traded, Ariza and Anderson are on tbe table to take back a big contract with long term money someone is trying to dump.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1804 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Tue Sep 4, 2018 2:34 pm

Waylay13 wrote:
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:Since everyone's so eager to send out TJ in a deal for a PG, I assume the PG we get back will be a 20 PPG 6 APG caliber player, in the first year of a 4 year deal paying $50 million? And yet all the names I see being bandied about look like 12 PPG 4 APG types.

Some were afraid of seeing Marquese blow up on the Rockets, well.... you send TJ out east and I think he has an outside shot at making the ASG. I realize we've created a huge log jam at the forward spots, but giving up TJ for some mediocre Top 30 PG would be too painful.


I am confused as to what skills you believe that TJ has that would led him to be traded for a 20 and 6 point guard. He is only a fair defender, a so so rebounder, doesnt pass or create for others and only scores in mid range and at the hoop; in short he is the type of player that in today's NBA has very little value. He may have been our second best player on the worst team in the NBA. To compare him to Cedric Ceballos maybe doing Ced a disservice as Ced was much better rebounder.


I think the mistake implicit in this oft-repeated line of reasoning is thinking that efficient 20 PPG players grow on trees. They don't. Not in "today's NBA" or yesterday's or tomorrow's. There are several aspects of TJ's game the don't get enough credit. True, the kid isn't a facilitator. But he does get offensive rebounds and hustle points, he doesn't turn the ball over, and he gives ballhandlers an outlet for assists. He can be an integral part of a highly efficient offense if put in the right situation.

This line of reasoning exists only because TJ doesn't get any national attention, and soft-minded Suns fans let this affect their thinking. And the reason he doesn't get national attention is because he was unheralded coming out of college, and we haven't won any games. IMO, TJ is the player least responsible for this team's struggles over the last couple seasons. So it's all bull**** to me.

The latest BSOTS pod where they wanted to trade TJ+ for George Hill made me want to throw up. Whatever TJ failed to do for the Suns last season, George Hill failed to do for the King five times over. What foolishness. GTFOutta here with that noise.
Biff
Veteran
Posts: 2,740
And1: 1,533
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Contact:
 

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1805 » by Biff » Tue Sep 4, 2018 3:12 pm

ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
Waylay13 wrote:
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:Since everyone's so eager to send out TJ in a deal for a PG, I assume the PG we get back will be a 20 PPG 6 APG caliber player, in the first year of a 4 year deal paying $50 million? And yet all the names I see being bandied about look like 12 PPG 4 APG types.

Some were afraid of seeing Marquese blow up on the Rockets, well.... you send TJ out east and I think he has an outside shot at making the ASG. I realize we've created a huge log jam at the forward spots, but giving up TJ for some mediocre Top 30 PG would be too painful.


I am confused as to what skills you believe that TJ has that would led him to be traded for a 20 and 6 point guard. He is only a fair defender, a so so rebounder, doesnt pass or create for others and only scores in mid range and at the hoop; in short he is the type of player that in today's NBA has very little value. He may have been our second best player on the worst team in the NBA. To compare him to Cedric Ceballos maybe doing Ced a disservice as Ced was much better rebounder.


I think the mistake implicit in this oft-repeated line of reasoning is thinking that efficient 20 PPG players grow on trees. They don't. Not in "today's NBA" or yesterday's or tomorrow's. There are several aspects of TJ's game the don't get enough credit. True, the kid isn't a facilitator. But he does get offensive rebounds and hustle points, he doesn't turn the ball over, and he gives ballhandlers an outlet for assists. He can be an integral part of a highly efficient offense if put in the right situation.

This line of reasoning exists only because TJ doesn't get any national attention, and soft-minded Suns fans let this affect their thinking. And the reason he doesn't get national attention is because he was unheralded coming out of college, and we haven't won any games. IMO, TJ is the player least responsible for this team's struggles over the last couple seasons. So it's all bull**** to me.

The latest BSOTS pod where they wanted to trade TJ+ for George Hill made me want to throw up. Whatever TJ failed to do for the Suns last season, George Hill failed to do for the King five times over. What foolishness. GTFOutta here with that noise.


I'm not sure I'd harp on TJ's efficiency. It's not terrible but it's certainly not a reason to keep him around. His TS% is right around the median % for the SF position. If the guy could ever develop a decent 3 point shot, you could start calling him efficient.

I would agree that trading TJ for George isn't a great idea. I'm fine including him in a trade for a decent PG though, especially since we're a bit crowded on the wing.
"Now everybody wanna play for the heat and the Lakers? Let's go back to being competitive and going at these peoples!" - Kevin Durant
User avatar
LukasBMW
Suns Forum SlamDRUNK Contributor
Posts: 4,827
And1: 4,291
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & San Diego CA
 

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1806 » by LukasBMW » Tue Sep 4, 2018 6:36 pm

PhxLax wrote:The PG hunt...

Pretty sure who ever sends Suns a starting PG they would want one of the youngsters (Okobo or Melton) as well as one of the wings (Warren or Jackson) in return. If salaries need matching then you've also got one of the bigs (Chandler, Arthur). So basically you're looking at a potential trade of Warren-Okobo-Arthur or something like that if u bringing back salary.

As for star PG's, Kemba (Kupchak wants him a Hornet for life) and Lillard (not leaving Portland) is not gonna happen. Clips most likely not giving up Beverley, they really really like him. I do see the Suns having one of these 10 point guards by start of October -- no particular order:

Dragic --> prob most attainable. But does he wanna come here again?
Rozier --> Danny Ainge gonna play hard to get, he usually rips people off in trades
Teodosic --> don't play a lick of defense; I question if he is good fit w/ Booker
JJ Barea --> temporary veteran glue piece for a year w/o eating cap space, teach the kids
Ntilikina --> may be redundant w/ Shaq-Okobo-Melton, but you'd have to give up a young PG for him
Brogdon --> absolutely my choice here, but what would be the cost??? He would be awesome here!!!
D Collison --> second choice here. IND got C.Joseph, A.Holiday at PG, plus Tyreke Evans may play PG
K Dunn --> if they wanna roll LaVine at point, he could be expendable? He's a solid guy that can steal.
D. Russell --> why not? They like Dinwiddie a lot and not like he eats up cap space
G Hill ---> same as Barea, just a temporary glue veteran, but eats up cap space so not sure


+1 million interwebs to you my friend. Great post.

Brogdon would be my choice as well, but you gotta figure that the Bucks are hell bent on keeping Giannis, Middleton, and Brogdon as their core. I think a big reason why they let Jabari walk was because they knew it's going to cost them to keep those 3 guys.
Image
User avatar
LukasBMW
Suns Forum SlamDRUNK Contributor
Posts: 4,827
And1: 4,291
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & San Diego CA
 

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1807 » by LukasBMW » Tue Sep 4, 2018 6:49 pm

http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y9s6wl38

Who says no?

Miami salary dumps. They get rid of Whiteside and exchange Dragic for Bledsoe. They also get the Bucks pick from us.

The Bucks get Whiteside and Dragic in exchange for Henson and Bledsoe. That's a good deal. It also costs them Brogdon, BUT they get back either Oboko or Melton from us AND dump Tony Snell's contract.

Bodgdon costs us 3 years of Tony Snell, the Bucks pick, and one of our PG prospects.


Your 2018-2019 Suns:

Brogdon/rookie
Booker/Snell
TJ/JJ/Bridges
Anderson/Ariza
Ayton/Bender/Holmes
Image
Son of Ra
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,289
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
 

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1808 » by Son of Ra » Tue Sep 4, 2018 6:57 pm

LukasBMW wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y9s6wl38

Who says no?

Miami salary dumps. They get rid of Whiteside and exchange Dragic for Bledsoe. They also get the Bucks pick from us.

The Bucks get Whiteside and Dragic in exchange for Henson and Bledsoe. That's a good deal. It also costs them Brogdon, BUT they get back either Oboko or Melton from us AND dump Tony Snell's contract.

Bodgdon costs us 3 years of Tony Snell, the Bucks pick, and one of our PG prospects.


Your 2018-2019 Suns:

Brogdon/rookie
Booker/Snell
TJ/JJ/Bridges
Anderson/Ariza
Ayton/Bender/Holmes

I'd be ok with that if we waived Snell. He's trash.
Great trade, tried to find the loser in this trade but it seems pretty balanced.
Edit: just noticed Snell has 3 years left, that's tough. And Brogdon is expiring, ugh
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1809 » by BobbieL » Tue Sep 4, 2018 7:03 pm

LukasBMW wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y9s6wl38

Who says no?

Miami salary dumps. They get rid of Whiteside and exchange Dragic for Bledsoe. They also get the Bucks pick from us.

The Bucks get Whiteside and Dragic in exchange for Henson and Bledsoe. That's a good deal. It also costs them Brogdon, BUT they get back either Oboko or Melton from us AND dump Tony Snell's contract.

Bodgdon costs us 3 years of Tony Snell, the Bucks pick, and one of our PG prospects.


Your 2018-2019 Suns:

Brogdon/rookie
Booker/Snell
TJ/JJ/Bridges
Anderson/Ariza
Ayton/Bender/Holmes


pretty good trade and my guess - riley would want to ship Henson to phoenix if the Suns still have Arthur on the roster to clear that salary from the cap
User avatar
King4Day
RealGM
Posts: 13,613
And1: 9,822
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Location: Pandora
         

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1810 » by King4Day » Tue Sep 4, 2018 7:12 pm

LukasBMW wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y9s6wl38

Who says no?

Miami salary dumps. They get rid of Whiteside and exchange Dragic for Bledsoe. They also get the Bucks pick from us.

The Bucks get Whiteside and Dragic in exchange for Henson and Bledsoe. That's a good deal. It also costs them Brogdon, BUT they get back either Oboko or Melton from us AND dump Tony Snell's contract.

Bodgdon costs us 3 years of Tony Snell, the Bucks pick, and one of our PG prospects.


Your 2018-2019 Suns:

Brogdon/rookie
Booker/Snell
TJ/JJ/Bridges
Anderson/Ariza
Ayton/Bender/Holmes


I don't think the Bucks would add Whiteside when they already have Lopez. Dragic isn't the same player either so that's putting a ton of money into 2 players who may or may not help them. It would cap strap them and potentially lead to an unhappy Giannis if they continue to lose.

I'd do it for sure though. I think Snell has more value than is being talked about.
"Sometimes, the dragon wins" #RallyTheValley
PhxLax
Junior
Posts: 356
And1: 325
Joined: Jul 02, 2017
   

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1811 » by PhxLax » Tue Sep 4, 2018 7:17 pm

LukasBMW wrote:Your 2018-2019 Suns:

Brogdon/rookie
Booker/Snell
TJ/JJ/Bridges
Anderson/Ariza
Ayton/Bender/Holmes


I doubt Suns paid $15 million on second day of free agency to get Ariza to become their backup power forward :banghead:

Ariza is a starting forward - at small or power. Or he's getting 6th man forward role off the bench at least. At least.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,147
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1812 » by bwgood77 » Tue Sep 4, 2018 7:17 pm

oddity wrote:
bigfoot wrote:


Poor example ... all women versus all boys team. What you need to recognize is there may be one special women that could compete on a team with men against another team of men. Sure it's hard to imagine but certainly not beyond the realm of possibility.
It's admittedly bot a perfect example. It's difficult to find women/mens teams competing against each other, and even more difficult to find mixed teams facing each other. Still, my point is that even exceptional female athletes suffer innate disadvantages by being female. Like, yeah Taurasi is 175 lbs, but shes gonna have a higher body fat percentage than most male athletes at that weight. Less upper body strenght. Weaker grip. It just doesn't seem feasible. Its never been feasible historically, and I don't see that changing now.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


She's also 36 and she'd also have to get used to playing with a bigger ball.
PhxLax
Junior
Posts: 356
And1: 325
Joined: Jul 02, 2017
   

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1813 » by PhxLax » Tue Sep 4, 2018 7:23 pm

I like something simpler ---> http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y8ofgjdc

Brogdon/Shaq/Melton
Booker/Snell/Reed
Ariza/Jackson/Bridges
Ryan/Bender/Arthur
Ayton/Holmes/Arthur

*Daniels, Chandler = buyout or just tell em to stay home on final year of contract
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,147
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1814 » by bwgood77 » Tue Sep 4, 2018 7:40 pm

Waylay13 wrote:
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:Since everyone's so eager to send out TJ in a deal for a PG, I assume the PG we get back will be a 20 PPG 6 APG caliber player, in the first year of a 4 year deal paying $50 million? And yet all the names I see being bandied about look like 12 PPG 4 APG types.

Some were afraid of seeing Marquese blow up on the Rockets, well.... you send TJ out east and I think he has an outside shot at making the ASG. I realize we've created a huge log jam at the forward spots, but giving up TJ for some mediocre Top 30 PG would be too painful.


I am confused as to what skills you believe that TJ has that would led him to be traded for a 20 and 6 point guard. He is only a fair defender, a so so rebounder, doesnt pass or create for others and only scores in mid range and at the hoop; in short he is the type of player that in today's NBA has very little value. He may have been our second best player on the worst team in the NBA. To compare him to Cedric Ceballos maybe doing Ced a disservice as Ced was much better rebounder.


I don't think he could be traded for that type of guy, but he's not worth trading for a guy who isn't much better than Shaq or an expiring guy. TJ's first 4 years are almost identical to Tobias Harris (TS%, BPM, VORP and most of the regular box stats), who was traded a number of times but has finally improved his 3 pt stroke. His first 3 years he was around 25% twice and 31.5% once, and in his 4th year finally jumped to 36%, and stayed around there a couple years before finally getting over 41% this past year. I pointed out another good example of this earlier, a player who is very successful (can't remember who now), who took 4-5 years before their 3 pt shot came around. It's happened for a lot of centers.

I think TJ will get better at it because it's not like he's a terrible FT shooter like others who have a hard time improving. I also think he improved on defense this past year....Triano said as much, but it isn't really in advanced stat evidence because most of that stuff largely relates to how good your whole team is on defense, and we were BY FAR the worst defensive team in the league last year. I don't think he will ever be a great defender, but he can probably be neutral....far closer to getting there then Booker for example.

For now, he's still our only reliable scorer outside of Booker and now Ayton. Most everyone else is just a spot up shooter or has trouble putting it down at all like Jackson. I think the fact we have more floor spreaders should make players like TJ even more dangerous on offense. Booker also plays and shoots much better when he is on the floor.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1815 » by BobbieL » Tue Sep 4, 2018 7:59 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Waylay13 wrote:
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:Since everyone's so eager to send out TJ in a deal for a PG, I assume the PG we get back will be a 20 PPG 6 APG caliber player, in the first year of a 4 year deal paying $50 million? And yet all the names I see being bandied about look like 12 PPG 4 APG types.

Some were afraid of seeing Marquese blow up on the Rockets, well.... you send TJ out east and I think he has an outside shot at making the ASG. I realize we've created a huge log jam at the forward spots, but giving up TJ for some mediocre Top 30 PG would be too painful.


I am confused as to what skills you believe that TJ has that would led him to be traded for a 20 and 6 point guard. He is only a fair defender, a so so rebounder, doesnt pass or create for others and only scores in mid range and at the hoop; in short he is the type of player that in today's NBA has very little value. He may have been our second best player on the worst team in the NBA. To compare him to Cedric Ceballos maybe doing Ced a disservice as Ced was much better rebounder.


I don't think he could be traded for that type of guy, but he's not worth trading for a guy who isn't much better than Shaq or an expiring guy. TJ's first 4 years are almost identical to Tobias Harris, who was traded a number of times but has finally improved his 3 pt stroke. His first 3 years he was around 25% twice and 31.5% once, and in his 4th year finally jumped to 36%, and stayed around there a couple years before finally getting over 41% this past year. I pointed out another good example of this earlier, a player who is very successful, who took 4-5 years before their 3 pt shot came around. It's happened for a lot of centers. I think TJ will get better at it because it's not like he's a terrible FT shooter like others who have a hard time improving. I also think he improved on defense this past year....Triano said as much, but it isn't really in advanced stat evidence because most of that stuff largely relates to how good your who team is on defense, and we were BY FAR the worst defensive team in the league last year. I don't think he will ever be a great defender, but he can probably be neutral....far closer to getting there then Booker for example.

For now, he's still our only reliable scorer outside of Booker and now Ayton. Most everyone else is just a spot up shooter or has trouble putting it down at all like Jackson. I think the fact we have more floor spreaders should make players like TJ even more dangerous on offense. Booker also plays and shoots much better when he is on the floor.


With Knight, Warren has value as a guy off the bench who can score points. Granted, not that I was counting on Knight to be a Super 6th man but that was the role I envisioned more than starting PG.

So, I think to the poster who said use Chandler, Daniels and maybe the Bucks pick - that brings Hill or Milos as your PG on a one year basis, keeps cap for the summer of 2019 but also removes a guy like Goran .

Unless Riley wants a draft pick back and expirings like Daniels and Chandler with a young guy like Okobo or Melton to start clearing up cap space and building back up the roster for the Heat.
User avatar
bigfoot
Suns Forum Anti-Tank Commander
Posts: 9,857
And1: 6,496
Joined: Sep 16, 2010
 

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1816 » by bigfoot » Tue Sep 4, 2018 9:16 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
oddity wrote:
bigfoot wrote:
Poor example ... all women versus all boys team. What you need to recognize is there may be one special women that could compete on a team with men against another team of men. Sure it's hard to imagine but certainly not beyond the realm of possibility.
It's admittedly bot a perfect example. It's difficult to find women/mens teams competing against each other, and even more difficult to find mixed teams facing each other. Still, my point is that even exceptional female athletes suffer innate disadvantages by being female. Like, yeah Taurasi is 175 lbs, but shes gonna have a higher body fat percentage than most male athletes at that weight. Less upper body strenght. Weaker grip. It just doesn't seem feasible. Its never been feasible historically, and I don't see that changing now.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


She's also 36 and she'd also have to get used to playing with a bigger ball.


I was never pushing Taurasi other than to say give her a tryout ... she is definitely too old. I am saying in the future there could be the "perfect storm woman" that might earn bench minutes or situational minutes. Not a high probability but also not an impossibility. Simply comparing a team full of men to a team full of women is ridiculous. A team of men against a team of men and one special woman could happen.
User avatar
LukasBMW
Suns Forum SlamDRUNK Contributor
Posts: 4,827
And1: 4,291
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & San Diego CA
 

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1817 » by LukasBMW » Wed Sep 5, 2018 12:12 am

DarkHawk wrote:
LukasBMW wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y9s6wl38

Who says no?

Miami salary dumps. They get rid of Whiteside and exchange Dragic for Bledsoe. They also get the Bucks pick from us.

The Bucks get Whiteside and Dragic in exchange for Henson and Bledsoe. That's a good deal. It also costs them Brogdon, BUT they get back either Oboko or Melton from us AND dump Tony Snell's contract.

Bodgdon costs us 3 years of Tony Snell, the Bucks pick, and one of our PG prospects.


Your 2018-2019 Suns:

Brogdon/rookie
Booker/Snell
TJ/JJ/Bridges
Anderson/Ariza
Ayton/Bender/Holmes


I don't think the Bucks would add Whiteside when they already have Lopez. Dragic isn't the same player either so that's putting a ton of money into 2 players who may or may not help them. It would cap strap them and potentially lead to an unhappy Giannis if they continue to lose.

I'd do it for sure though. I think Snell has more value than is being talked about.


It's actually a sneaky cap dump for them as Dragic/Whiteside only have 2 years left and they ditch 3 years of Snell. Bledsoe is up for a new contract in a year and while I doubt he gets a ton of interest in the new (more reasonable) free agent market, they'd still have to pony up at least $12-$15m a year to keep him. Given his history and rumors about a bad fit with Giannis, I wonder if they kick him to the curb a bit early?

Dragic/Whiteside on paper is an upgrade over Bledsoe/Henson and if it doesn't work, both contract become assets (expiring) for next year AND/OR they can ditch both in two years and have a ton of cap room to build around Giannis and Middleton.

The fact that they get a young PG prospect back and also keep their backup (Dellavedova) ensures adequate coverage if Dragic gets injured.
Image
User avatar
LukasBMW
Suns Forum SlamDRUNK Contributor
Posts: 4,827
And1: 4,291
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & San Diego CA
 

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1818 » by LukasBMW » Wed Sep 5, 2018 12:13 am

PhxLax wrote:I like something simpler ---> http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y8ofgjdc

Brogdon/Shaq/Melton
Booker/Snell/Reed
Ariza/Jackson/Bridges
Ryan/Bender/Arthur
Ayton/Holmes/Arthur

*Daniels, Chandler = buyout or just tell em to stay home on final year of contract


Mine is better. I'd rather give up that Bucks pick then TJ. :)
Image
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,229
And1: 24,587
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1819 » by lilfishi22 » Wed Sep 5, 2018 1:25 am

ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:I think the mistake implicit in this oft-repeated line of reasoning is thinking that efficient 20 PPG players grow on trees. They don't. Not in "today's NBA" or yesterday's or tomorrow's. There are several aspects of TJ's game the don't get enough credit. True, the kid isn't a facilitator. But he does get offensive rebounds and hustle points, he doesn't turn the ball over, and he gives ballhandlers an outlet for assists. He can be an integral part of a highly efficient offense if put in the right situation.

This line of reasoning exists only because TJ doesn't get any national attention, and soft-minded Suns fans let this affect their thinking. And the reason he doesn't get national attention is because he was unheralded coming out of college, and we haven't won any games. IMO, TJ is the player least responsible for this team's struggles over the last couple seasons. So it's all bull**** to me.

The latest BSOTS pod where they wanted to trade TJ+ for George Hill made me want to throw up. Whatever TJ failed to do for the Suns last season, George Hill failed to do for the King five times over. What foolishness. GTFOutta here with that noise.

Yeah I dunno about this

TJ ISN'T a useless player or that a semi-efficient 20ppg is an easy get either, that isn't the reason for the grim forward outlook. He's still young, still has potential he can tap into but after 4 seasons and after signing his extension, he *still* hasn't really addressed any facet of his weaknesses. He's increased his scoring production and amazingly kept the same level of efficiency but everywhere else he's been stagnant. That's also the other oft-repeated line which even I believed for the longest time; that he's efficient. He's not inefficient but he's not really that efficient either by today's standards either. In today's world and probably tomorrow's NBA, efficiency is no longer based on raw FG%, it's dependent on the position (of course) as well as where the efficiency is derived from. A player who shoots .45 overall and .38 from the 3 while getting to the line for an efficient 80FT% is more efficient and valuable than a player who shoots .500 from the field but doesn't shoot 3's or get the line often, especially if they are a guard or wing.

From an efficiency standpoint, his TS% is lower than that of even Booker because he doesn't shoot the 3 and last season ranked 9th among Suns players who played over 500min for the season in FT rate. The ONLY thing carrying this narrative that he's an efficient player is that he scores at a good rate from 2P%. For comparison these were his TS%'s since his rookie season

.551
.549
.539
.541
.542 - career average

Those are pretty average efficiency. To compare again, Booker TS%'s since his rookie season below. Here's a guy that shoots .45% from the 2 for his career that is more efficient than TJ who in his 4 year career has shot a least 52% from within the arc. Even now Booker is only average from an efficiency standpoint.

.535
.531
.561
.542 - career average.

I'm not trying to prove Booker > TJ because that's obvious for any basketball fan but I amm just trying to highlight what is considered 'valuable' in today's NBA and going forward with regards to efficiency.

And aside from that one season which now appear to be flukey where he averaged .400 from the 3, he's gotten worse and attempts have gone down. He hasn't shown meaningful improvement from a defensive standpoint and despite Chandler and Len playing less minutes and Big Sauce out the entire season, his rebounding rate and overall rebounding averages have gone down.

So you're right in that players that average 20/6 on ok efficiency don't grow on trees. But big C's who average 20/10 on .52FG% doesn't either. Do you know whose stats those were? Peak Vucevic. Sure they don't grow on trees but they also just aren't nearly as valuable as they once were. He's still scoring at above the Suns TS% but he's scoring at under league average efficiency. Limit it to only forwards and he doesn't fare too well there either from an efficiency standpoint.

He's not a bad player, as you mentioned he doesn't turn the ball over, he's an above average offensive rebounder at his position, he shoots near .500 from the field which has value and he's signed for to an OK contract. But he's certainly not as efficient or as valuable as you might think he is. And even if he's not the reason for a lot of our issues, he hasn't really proven to be an answer either when two of our biggest issues is defense and shooting and he addresses neither.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,147
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2018 Free Agency and Trade Discussion continued 

Post#1820 » by bwgood77 » Wed Sep 5, 2018 3:11 am

lilfishi22 wrote:
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:I think the mistake implicit in this oft-repeated line of reasoning is thinking that efficient 20 PPG players grow on trees. They don't. Not in "today's NBA" or yesterday's or tomorrow's. There are several aspects of TJ's game the don't get enough credit. True, the kid isn't a facilitator. But he does get offensive rebounds and hustle points, he doesn't turn the ball over, and he gives ballhandlers an outlet for assists. He can be an integral part of a highly efficient offense if put in the right situation.

This line of reasoning exists only because TJ doesn't get any national attention, and soft-minded Suns fans let this affect their thinking. And the reason he doesn't get national attention is because he was unheralded coming out of college, and we haven't won any games. IMO, TJ is the player least responsible for this team's struggles over the last couple seasons. So it's all bull**** to me.

The latest BSOTS pod where they wanted to trade TJ+ for George Hill made me want to throw up. Whatever TJ failed to do for the Suns last season, George Hill failed to do for the King five times over. What foolishness. GTFOutta here with that noise.

Yeah I dunno about this

TJ ISN'T a useless player or that a semi-efficient 20ppg is an easy get either, that isn't the reason for the grim forward outlook. He's still young, still has potential he can tap into but after 4 seasons and after signing his extension, he *still* hasn't really addressed any facet of his weaknesses. He's increased his scoring production and amazingly kept the same level of efficiency but everywhere else he's been stagnant. That's also the other oft-repeated line which even I believed for the longest time; that he's efficient. He's not inefficient but he's not really that efficient either by today's standards either. In today's world and probably tomorrow's NBA, efficiency is no longer based on raw FG%, it's dependent on the position (of course) as well as where the efficiency is derived from. A player who shoots .45 overall and .38 from the 3 while getting to the line for an efficient 80FT% is more efficient and valuable than a player who shoots .500 from the field but doesn't shoot 3's or get the line often, especially if they are a guard or wing.

From an efficiency standpoint, his TS% is lower than that of even Booker because he doesn't shoot the 3 and last season ranked 9th among Suns players who played over 500min for the season in FT rate. The ONLY thing carrying this narrative that he's an efficient player is that he scores at a good rate from 2P%. For comparison these were his TS%'s since his rookie season

.551
.549
.539
.541
.542 - career average

Those are pretty average efficiency. To compare again, Booker TS%'s since his rookie season below. Here's a guy that shoots .45% from the 2 for his career that is more efficient than TJ who in his 4 year career has shot a least 52% from within the arc. Even now Booker is only average from an efficiency standpoint.

.535
.531
.561
.542 - career average.

I'm not trying to prove Booker > TJ because that's obvious for any basketball fan but I amm just trying to highlight what is considered 'valuable' in today's NBA and going forward with regards to efficiency.

And aside from that one season which now appear to be flukey where he averaged .400 from the 3, he's gotten worse and attempts have gone down. He hasn't shown meaningful improvement from a defensive standpoint and despite Chandler and Len playing less minutes and Big Sauce out the entire season, his rebounding rate and overall rebounding averages have gone down.

So you're right in that players that average 20/6 on ok efficiency don't grow on trees. But big C's who average 20/10 on .52FG% doesn't either. Do you know whose stats those were? Peak Vucevic. Sure they don't grow on trees but they also just aren't nearly as valuable as they once were. He's still scoring at above the Suns TS% but he's scoring at under league average efficiency. Limit it to only forwards and he doesn't fare too well there either from an efficiency standpoint.

He's not a bad player, as you mentioned he doesn't turn the ball over, he's an above average offensive rebounder at his position, he shoots near .500 from the field which has value and he's signed for to an OK contract. But he's certainly not as efficient or as valuable as you might think he is. And even if he's not the reason for a lot of our issues, he hasn't really proven to be an answer either when two of our biggest issues is defense and shooting and he addresses neither.


I've mentioned I think TJ can improve from 3 and likely will, but I don't think unless you have improved, you should just launch 3s. You have mentioned (I think) that you trust JJ is more likely to improve from 3 because he more willingly shoots them. I don't think that's necessarily accurate or a good thing. Westbrook has been a pretty terrible 3 pt shooter his entire career yet he launches a lot of them. He shot over 34% 2 years ago on 7.2 apg, but like you said, even that only equates to about 51% from 2, which is basically below league average TS%. But that's his absolute best year. He normally hovers around 30% and I've read multiple times that he should stop launching these 3s and that he is is by far the leader in history of attempts with that bad of a percentage or less. I think it's good to have a decent number of attempts if you can hit around 33-34%, but you should really only be launching a ton of them if you are over 38% or so.

Funny thing is, JJ reminds me of a Westbrook version of a SF. And I like Westbrook and his fearlessness. Westbrook is historically a great FT shooter though so you'd think he would do better from 3. JJ is not....I don't know if I want him launching that many, and I don't want TJ launching that many either unless they get to a respectable level.

I think to a certain point, allowing your players to launch them is good, and encouraging them to is good, but I think they really need to work on improving in the offseason, and you need to enter the season letting them go for it, but ultimately it's not good to have them launch too many if they are not falling after a number of games. Defenses will just sag off anyway because they want them to shoot them and not have Booker, Bridges, Ariza, Bender, or Anderson shoot them. We have plenty of guys now to space the floor finally. Theoretically Reed should, and of course Daniels if he plays much.

The confidence a guy like JJ has can end up being a little wreckless...and it has worked against Westbrook too in big moments, taking a shot when he could give the ball up for a better one...particularly in that series against GS when he was still playing with KD. TJ hesitates because he knows it's not a good shot for him now...he knows you need to be feeling it. I think he has a mental block with 3s, and I hope Igor works with him to remove it.

It was interesting...while people were talking about Rubio here I went to the Utah board to see what they were saying about him and there is a recent pod about how Snyder yanked Rubio after he missed like 6 shots....and he had been shooting horribly the last 6 games or so and really most of the season to that point. And then he came back (maybe after halftime...and I wonder if Igor got into Snyder's ear) but in front of the whole team Snyder said to Rubio "You know, I looked back at the tape, and I shouldn't have yanked you....those were all good shots" and it empowered him and for the rest of the season he shot like 47% from 3 and thrived with the team. Those types of stories I find interesting....I'm sure it's the type of thing Igor brings with him.

It's in the Rubio appreciation thread there....the pod is linked and even the time they talk about it is mentioned...like the 27 minute mark or something...you only have to listen to like 5 minutes of the pod to get the story.

Anyway, Rubio, always a good FT shooter, they said this was the first time a coach empowered him to shoot from distance instead of encouraging him not to. Part of me thinks Igor had something to do with this and I think he can do the same with someone like TJ who hesitates...maybe..

I don't think JJ needs any more of a green light to shoot or take it to the rim. He doesn't lack confidence in doing that. He needs to learn to pick his spots better though. I noticed when it was posted that Chriss was among the league leaders in missed dunks, Jackson wasn't far behind last year...and of those leaders both of those guys had some of the fewest attempts of the most, so their % of missed dunks was probably at the very top.

Return to Phoenix Suns