lebron3-14-3 wrote:So, are there any guys that you feel like I should open a poll about to decide their position? there have been doubts for rodman, debusschere, marion, kirilenko.
To me Kirilenko sf, marion sf but close to pf, debusschere you guys are saying sf, rodman sf.
anyway stephen jackson yes, paul george absolutely yes, paul pressey yes, anthony mason is a pf, we can put bill hanzlik
wrt the bolded: to the contrary, nearly all of us have been saying DeBusschere is a PF.
I still lump Rodman with the PF's (because that's where he played the majority of his career), though I don't disagree that the majority of his great
defensive years came while playing primarily SF. His two DPOY awards both came in years playing more SF. However.....
*He's listed as PF in 9 of his 14 seasons (even if we omit the last two limited minute seasons, it's 7 of 12 seasons). 63.1% of his career minutes fall in PF seasons. If we call his prime '88-'97, that's four SF seasons, six PF seasons (60.1% of the minutes in that span at PF); even if you want to omit '97 from his prime, that's 5 of 9 seasons and 56.6% of prime minutes coming at PF.
**The years he was an All-Star: 1 at SF, 1 at PF.
***The years All-NBA: 0 at SF, 2 at PF.
****The years selected All-Defensive: 3 at SF, 5 at PF.
While I sympathize with going on how his best defensive years were primarily as a SF, to deny that he's a majority PF would be a departure from how we've been classifying players to this point in the project, imo (EDIT: as Dr Positivity said in post #41 re: precedent).
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire