1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

Player(s) of the Game

Jerami Grant | 12 PTS (4-7 FG, 2-4 3P), 2 BLK
0
No votes
Steven Adams | 12 PTS (3-5 FG), 9 REB
1
8%
Terrance Ferguson | 8 PTS (3-5 FG, 2-3 3P)
1
8%
Dennis Schroder | 19 PTS (9-17 FG), 6 AST
1
8%
Abdel Nader | 15 PTS (6-6 FG)
7
58%
Patrick Patterson | 13 PTS (5-7 FG, 3-3 3P)
2
17%
Other (specify below)
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 12

User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#61 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:18 am

Pops giving kind words to Adams isn’t coincidence.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,559
And1: 6,818
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#62 » by slick_watts » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:20 am

patterson and ferguson being capable shooting the ball is kind of important. hopefully that continues. and hopefully abrines gets over his worms. i'm done with diallo. nader might be better but he's pretty slow / bad on defense.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,429
And1: 7,564
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#63 » by Dadouv47 » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:21 am

Pop loves Adams, always made great comments about him (2016 playoffs)
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#64 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:22 am

I try to be objective and give credit where it’s due. Nader may end up being a solid end of bench rotation player. It’s kind of ironic that the guy who looks like the most un-Presti type player on the roster seems to fit so well. It’s almost like having a player with basketball skills who isn’t a freak athlete seems to have a place on a team.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,429
And1: 7,564
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#65 » by Dadouv47 » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:22 am

Still don't get why such a great coach traded for Derozan though
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#66 » by spearsy23 » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:23 am

slick_watts wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
er, duh.

Then why are you *****ing?


because he's showing no signs of shooting / scoring better? i think i was pretty clear on that. shooting poorly today is part of the 'meaningful trend' encompassing the entire season.

He's shooting 46% over there last four coming into this game, which could be part of a trend or just random variance, but you weren't here talking about it after the last two for some reason.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,429
And1: 7,564
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#67 » by Dadouv47 » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:24 am

ThunderBolt wrote:I try to be objective and give credit where it’s due. Nader may end up being a solid end of bench rotation player. It’s kind of ironic that the guy who looks like the most un-Presti type player on the roster seems to fit so well. It’s almost like having a player with basketball skills who isn’t a freak athlete seems to have a place on a team.


2 games ago I didn't know why he was on our roster and now he's showing the value he can bring to this team. Still need more playing time before having a real opinion on him but I'm hopeful
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#68 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:26 am

slick_watts wrote:patterson and ferguson being capable shooting the ball is kind of important. hopefully that continues. and hopefully abrines gets over his worms. i'm done with diallo. nader might be better but he's pretty slow / bad on defense.

“Done with diallo” in what sense? He probably isn’t going to contribute much this year but neither did Ferguson last year.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Dn4sty
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 1,929
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#69 » by Dn4sty » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:26 am

Derozan has fallen off a cliff.

Also please let 2Pat be back.
User avatar
NaturalThunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,491
And1: 3,907
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
     

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#70 » by NaturalThunder » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:27 am

ThunderBolt wrote:It’s almost like having a player with basketball skills who isn’t a freak athlete seems to have a place on a team.

It's worked really well for the Spurs for years.
Said in a thread about which point guards would make OKC better if they replaced Westbrook:
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,429
And1: 7,564
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#71 » by Dadouv47 » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:27 am

spearsy23 wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Then why are you *****ing?


because he's showing no signs of shooting / scoring better? i think i was pretty clear on that. shooting poorly today is part of the 'meaningful trend' encompassing the entire season.

He's shooting 46% over there last four coming into this game, which could be part of a trend or just random variance, but you weren't here talking about it after the last two for some reason.


Pop also made great adjustments this game and Westbrook couldn't take easy midrange shots like last game. He's slowly getting his shot back. Nothing meaningful but I'm less worried than some weeks ago.
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,559
And1: 6,818
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#72 » by slick_watts » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:29 am

spearsy23 wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Then why are you *****ing?


because he's showing no signs of shooting / scoring better? i think i was pretty clear on that. shooting poorly today is part of the 'meaningful trend' encompassing the entire season.


He's shooting 46% over there last four coming into this game, which could be part of a trend or just random variance, but you weren't here talking about it after the last two for some reason.


does whether or not i'm here change what is occurring? i'm not speaking westbrook's horrific shooting and scoring efficiency into existence, it is happening.

if i talk about westbrook's troubles after a good game, i'm being a troll. if i don't, i'm "conspicuously absent". either way you're going to have a problem with it. so idc.
Dn4sty
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 1,929
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#73 » by Dn4sty » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:29 am

Nader gets lost on defense, but he’s got that slowmo skill like Kyle Anderson
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,559
And1: 6,818
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#74 » by slick_watts » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:30 am

ThunderBolt wrote:
slick_watts wrote:patterson and ferguson being capable shooting the ball is kind of important. hopefully that continues. and hopefully abrines gets over his worms. i'm done with diallo. nader might be better but he's pretty slow / bad on defense.

“Done with diallo” in what sense? He probably isn’t going to contribute much this year but neither did Ferguson last year.


not worth rotation minutes this year.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,429
And1: 7,564
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#75 » by Dadouv47 » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:35 am

so many overreaction...Diallo was great in the beginning of the year. He sucked big time tonight and isn't playing well lately.

2pat had a great game and I'm still not confident having him as our back up PF (I was so high on him but since he struggled so much...)
User avatar
NaturalThunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,491
And1: 3,907
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
     

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#76 » by NaturalThunder » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:35 am

slick_watts wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
because he's showing no signs of shooting / scoring better? i think i was pretty clear on that. shooting poorly today is part of the 'meaningful trend' encompassing the entire season.


He's shooting 46% over there last four coming into this game, which could be part of a trend or just random variance, but you weren't here talking about it after the last two for some reason.


does whether or not i'm here change what is occurring? i'm not speaking westbrook's horrific shooting and scoring efficiency into existence, it is happening.

if i talk about westbrook's troubles after a good game, i'm being a troll. if i don't, i'm "conspicuously absent". either way you're going to have a problem with it. so idc.

Serious question.

Have you ever admitted to anyone that you were wrong about something? Not just on message boards, but in your personal life, too. Have you ever actually said or typed the words "Sorry, I was wrong?"

Because on message boards, you come across as one of those mega-d***s who, never in a million years, would actually be humble enough to admit he's wrong. Or, at the very least, admit to someone who you're debating a topic with, that they have a good point and you might have to rethink your stance.
Said in a thread about which point guards would make OKC better if they replaced Westbrook:
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#77 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:36 am

slick_watts wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:
slick_watts wrote:patterson and ferguson being capable shooting the ball is kind of important. hopefully that continues. and hopefully abrines gets over his worms. i'm done with diallo. nader might be better but he's pretty slow / bad on defense.

“Done with diallo” in what sense? He probably isn’t going to contribute much this year but neither did Ferguson last year.


not worth rotation minutes this year.

Roberson is hurt, Abrines is dragging hit butt on the carpet, Nader doesn’t play defense, schroder doesn’t fit alongside , TLC sucks...do you see the dilemma?
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Osirus89
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 2,017
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
   

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#78 » by Osirus89 » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:36 am

I think it is safe to say the Russ' finishing ability has finally come all the way back. He shot FTs well too so I can't complain too much since his FT shooting is far more important than his jumpshot.

Nader is turning into found money as a rotation player. The team hasn't missed Abrines nearly as much with him being able to contribute and Ferg shooting well. Hats off to Patterson. I've been fit to be tied with him for a while, but I will never turn my nose up at a good contribution.

Dennis Schroder is one of the most maddening players thats ever played for OKC. Looks like a G league player in the first half and a world beater in the second. Go figure. He's a sieve on defense but there aren't many offensive options outside the starters so just play craps every game.
Dn4sty
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 1,929
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#79 » by Dn4sty » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:36 am

Could a guy like Troy Daniels do what Belinelli did tonight in OKC
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,559
And1: 6,818
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: 1/12 | G42: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder - 7PM CST 

Post#80 » by slick_watts » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:37 am

NaturalThunder wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
He's shooting 46% over there last four coming into this game, which could be part of a trend or just random variance, but you weren't here talking about it after the last two for some reason.


does whether or not i'm here change what is occurring? i'm not speaking westbrook's horrific shooting and scoring efficiency into existence, it is happening.

if i talk about westbrook's troubles after a good game, i'm being a troll. if i don't, i'm "conspicuously absent". either way you're going to have a problem with it. so idc.

Serious question.

Have you ever admitted to anyone that you were wrong about something? Not just on message boards, but in your personal life, too. Have you ever actually said or typed the words "Sorry, I was wrong?"

Because on message boards, you come across as one of those mega-d***s who, never in a million years, would actually be humble enough to admit he's wrong. Or, at the very least, admit to someone who you're debating a topic with, that they have a good point and you might have to rethink your stance.


humility is a character flaw.

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder