Shoe wrote:Demps understands one Tatum for the next 6 years is better than the combination of Lakers young players, quality over quantity.
Do you seriously believe that one Tatum is worth more than Ball, Ingram, Kuzma and Rondo?
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Shoe wrote:Demps understands one Tatum for the next 6 years is better than the combination of Lakers young players, quality over quantity.
Shoe wrote:Demps understands one Tatum for the next 6 years is better than the combination of Lakers young players, quality over quantity.
Kordic27 wrote:Ainge will offer Tatum, which is the biggest prize. Ainge has to, or his rep will be totally shot.
vxmike wrote:Jon1798 wrote:vxmike wrote:
Did you realize the Kings are above the Lakers in th standing right now?
You realize the Lakers would be acquiring Anthony Davis?
His team is 13th right now despite having decent talent. There’s no evidence he would propel the Lakers upwards given that they would lose a ton of non-center depth. Any games he or LBJ missed would likely be a loss
cuyankees wrote:NOP will never regret turning down an offer that is 5/6 FRPs in value + BI, Zub, Hart when KP just got 5 + DSJ.
Edug27 wrote:...Danny has been waiting and prepping for this moment for years now. AD has always been his target. If you acquire AD, I think that retains Kyrie (afterall they are "like brothers")... and with Kyrie, plus Brad and winning, that should convince AD to stick around. KG didn't want Boston at first, until Danny addressed his concerns. We traded for Kyrie with 2 years left on his deal, giving up an unprotected Nets pick. Obviously not the same level of risk, but risk nonetheless.
All we know so far is that AD and his dad question Bostons loyalty and therefore do not prefer Boston... Nothing about location or winning.. The concern is loyalty. That can be fixed. That's not like being traded to a small market that has no chance of winning. A simple convo with AD can clear up some of that.
But yes, of course, keeping Kyrie is key here. I'm sure if this trickles into the summer... Kyrie and Danny (and AD) will all have a nice long talk over some Chipotle.
Gooner wrote:Shoe wrote:Demps understands one Tatum for the next 6 years is better than the combination of Lakers young players, quality over quantity.
I like Tatum, but i don't understand why everyone views him as such a superior player to Ingram and Kuzma.
Jon1798 wrote:Gooner wrote:Shoe wrote:Demps understands one Tatum for the next 6 years is better than the combination of Lakers young players, quality over quantity.
I like Tatum, but i don't understand why everyone views him as such a superior player to Ingram and Kuzma.
Kuzma’s defense makes him essentially a bench player on a good team. And Ingram is more of a point forward that isn’t quite good enough to have the offense run through him. I also don’t like that Ingram will be off his rookie deal soon.
Tatum is a more complete player at a very valuable position.
No one who is being serious means to say Kuzma and Ingram don’t have value. I just think they are limited player that would have limited impact on putting together a really good team. Where as Tatum is a great compliment next to Jrue and a no doubt front line starter.
KnickFan33 wrote:cuyankees wrote:NOP will never regret turning down an offer that is 5/6 FRPs in value + BI, Zub, Hart when KP just got 5 + DSJ.
Did new details come out that I'm unaware of? That's awesome if true.
Bill Bradley wrote:All of the “nos”