nate33 wrote:payitforward wrote:blah blah blah... etc. etc. etc...
I'm tired of having this debate....
Scoring with efficiency and setting up for others as the number one option and focal point of the opposition's defense is much harder than being a hyper-efficient finisher as a 3rd option catch-and-shoot guy....
It's an extremely strong point, nate. In fact, it's 100% true with no room for doubt. It would be foolish to argue against it.
Hence, I'm happy to cede to you in "this debate."
What I would question -- or, better, what would be worth questioning, or lets instead say
investigating -- are the terms of the "debate." After all, your claim wasn't that Beal was better at the skill(s) you describe above but just that he is better. Viz:
nate33 wrote:Porter at his best isn't as good as what Beal has done this year. Beal has taken it to a new level and is now making his way into the top 20 players in the league...
If one were to discuss that larger claim objectively, both in re: Otto & also the "top 20 players" question, one would have to determine the different effects on wins/losses of radically different aspects of the game. That is assuming that the terms good, better, & best are to be thought of along that scale.
I'd be perfectly willing to do that, but... the truth is that maybe it's something to do in the off-season. Or, it might not be of general enough interest to discuss here at all. I'm sure there are forums where people do discuss just this question.
Peace!