ImageImageImage

MLE targets in the offseason

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 1,997
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#1 » by Canadafan » Sat Feb 16, 2019 9:22 pm

How much do we have to spend?
Who's out there that would sign for what we have to offer?
Obvious needs are a starting SF and/or SG. PG too if Ish leaves.
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#2 » by sc8581 » Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:29 pm

I like Darren Collison, maybe split the MLE between McConnell and a SF like Aminu, Ariza would be nice too.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,257
And1: 5,245
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#3 » by Kilo » Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:45 pm

We have $15M under the tax threshold (not counting Robinson's TO). 9M is roughly the MLE(4 year contract max), 5.5M is the tax-payers MLE(3 yr contract max), we should have the bi-annual exemption to use as well which is about $4M and I believe can only be two years in length.

If we might want to go into the tax - we only use the tax payers MLE. This might be smart because we could look to make a big trade during the season and don't want to be blocked by not being able to take on more money coming our way in the deal.

If we use the MLE on a PG, we let Ish walk and then could only use the BAE on a wing. If we keep Ish we could use the MLE on a wing. If we use the full MLE we could only pay Ish 5M. If we use the tax payers MLE we could pay him more and still stay under the tax.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,907
And1: 18,048
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#4 » by Snakebites » Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:48 pm

Nobody.

At least not long term.
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#5 » by Spider156 » Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:36 am

Can we sign Reggie Bullock with the MLE? I think he's worth it and there's no reason not to come back to Detroit where his career flourished.
Defense wins championships
DetroitPistons
RealGM
Posts: 16,113
And1: 3,441
Joined: Apr 19, 2010
Location: Michigan

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#6 » by DetroitPistons » Sun Feb 17, 2019 12:50 am

It looked there were some decent SF options on the free agency list. Personally, Marcus Morris would be the guy I meet with on midnight of day of free agency. He has been playing great so idk if the MLE will be enough for him but he would a PERFECT fit if he came back here. He is a locker room leader, can get his own shot, shoot 3s, and defend on the perimeter. He is pretty versatile too.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,907
And1: 18,048
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#7 » by Snakebites » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:30 am

DetroitPistons wrote:It looked there were some decent SF options on the free agency list. Personally, Marcus Morris would be the guy I meet with on midnight of day of free agency. He has been playing great so idk if the MLE will be enough for him but he would a PERFECT fit if he came back here. He is a locker room leader, can get his own shot, shoot 3s, and defend on the perimeter. He is pretty versatile too.

I don't know if he's gettable for the MLE, but it certainly won't be what he's looking for, meaning you're not getting him for that on a midnight signing, at least I'd think, especially not at midnight.

I'd say any contract we'd be able to get someone to sign at midnight on day one is probably a signing we'll regret.
Cowology
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 41,164
And1: 4,631
Joined: Sep 05, 2004

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#8 » by Cowology » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:39 am

I feel like anybody we are able to sign for the MLE will simply be looked at as another bad contract. I'd rather overpay for a crappy player on a 2-yr contract than give the full MLE to a mediocre player. We are screwed regardless; let's at least attempt to mitigate the long term damage in the hopes that 3-4 yrs down the line Gores decides to cash out.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,720
And1: 9,552
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#9 » by bstein14 » Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:15 am

MLE doesn't have to be a four year deal it could be a 3 year deal with a team option in the third year.

Reggie Bullock, Marcus Morris, JJ Reddick(likely a lux tax casualty of Philly signing Harris and Butler), Brook Lopez(could backup both Dre and Blake and do a big 3 rotation), Willie Caulie-Stein, Rudy Gay, Thad Young, Danny Green, Terrance Ross, Aminu, Oubre, Ariza, Matthews, Beverly, Bazemore are all guys we should consider. I think part goes to Ish to keep as backup PG if we can keep him for less than $6 million we should have full MLE for someone.
Crymson
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,727
And1: 738
Joined: Apr 17, 2016

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#10 » by Crymson » Sun Feb 17, 2019 3:43 am

Snakebites wrote:I don't know if he's gettable for the MLE, but it certainly won't be what he's looking for, meaning you're not getting him for that on a midnight signing, at least I'd think, especially not at midnight.

I'd say any contract we'd be able to get someone to sign at midnight on day one is probably a signing we'll regret.


You mean like Josh Smith? :D

And yeah, he ain't gettable with the MLE. Not by this team, anyway.
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#11 » by vege » Sun Feb 17, 2019 3:58 am

Spider156 wrote:Can we sign Reggie Bullock with the MLE? I think he's worth it and there's no reason not to come back to Detroit where his career flourished.


Yes we can and he should be our #1 target.
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#12 » by vege » Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:00 am

bstein14 wrote:MLE doesn't have to be a four year deal it could be a 3 year deal with a team option in the third year.

Reggie Bullock, Marcus Morris, JJ Reddick(likely a lux tax casualty of Philly signing Harris and Butler), Brook Lopez(could backup both Dre and Blake and do a big 3 rotation), Willie Caulie-Stein, Rudy Gay, Thad Young, Danny Green, Terrance Ross, Aminu, Oubre, Ariza, Matthews, Beverly, Bazemore are all guys we should consider. I think part goes to Ish to keep as backup PG if we can keep him for less than $6 million we should have full MLE for someone.


We don't need to use the MLE to bring Ish back, we have hiis bird rights.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,720
And1: 9,552
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#13 » by bstein14 » Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:02 am

vege wrote:
bstein14 wrote:MLE doesn't have to be a four year deal it could be a 3 year deal with a team option in the third year.

Reggie Bullock, Marcus Morris, JJ Reddick(likely a lux tax casualty of Philly signing Harris and Butler), Brook Lopez(could backup both Dre and Blake and do a big 3 rotation), Willie Caulie-Stein, Rudy Gay, Thad Young, Danny Green, Terrance Ross, Aminu, Oubre, Ariza, Matthews, Beverly, Bazemore are all guys we should consider. I think part goes to Ish to keep as backup PG if we can keep him for less than $6 million we should have full MLE for someone.


We don't need to use the MLE to bring Ish back, we have hiis bird rights.


Sorry I mean part of our money under the luxury tax level. Bring back Ish, MLE FA, 1st round draft pick and then likely the rest of our players will have to be at league minimum salary.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,720
And1: 9,552
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#14 » by bstein14 » Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:04 am

We have 10 players under contract already next year, so 11 is Ish, 12 is our 1st rounder, 13 is our MLE FA signing, and the last two would likely be league minimum salary guys. Perhaps a league minimum center and PG.
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#15 » by vege » Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:04 am

bstein14 wrote:
vege wrote:
bstein14 wrote:MLE doesn't have to be a four year deal it could be a 3 year deal with a team option in the third year.

Reggie Bullock, Marcus Morris, JJ Reddick(likely a lux tax casualty of Philly signing Harris and Butler), Brook Lopez(could backup both Dre and Blake and do a big 3 rotation), Willie Caulie-Stein, Rudy Gay, Thad Young, Danny Green, Terrance Ross, Aminu, Oubre, Ariza, Matthews, Beverly, Bazemore are all guys we should consider. I think part goes to Ish to keep as backup PG if we can keep him for less than $6 million we should have full MLE for someone.


We don't need to use the MLE to bring Ish back, we have hiis bird rights.


Sorry I mean part of our money under the luxury tax level. Bring back Ish, MLE FA, 1st round draft pick and then likely the rest of our players will have to be at league minimum salary.


Oh yeap, I agree with you.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 1,997
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#16 » by Canadafan » Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:05 pm

Kilo wrote:We have $15M under the tax threshold (not counting Robinson's TO). 9M is roughly the MLE(4 year contract max), 5.5M is the tax-payers MLE(3 yr contract max), we should have the bi-annual exemption to use as well which is about $4M and I believe can only be two years in length.

If we might want to go into the tax - we only use the tax payers MLE. This might be smart because we could look to make a big trade during the season and don't want to be blocked by not being able to take on more money coming our way in the deal.

If we use the MLE on a PG, we let Ish walk and then could only use the BAE on a wing. If we keep Ish we could use the MLE on a wing. If we use the full MLE we could only pay Ish 5M. If we use the tax payers MLE we could pay him more and still stay under the tax.


The rules confuse my tiny brain. Using the "tax payers" means we're in the luxury tax? But we're not.... Hmmm
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#17 » by The Penguin » Sun Feb 17, 2019 3:32 pm

What, you guys don't think Stefanski & co will be like Stan and give Sam Dekker ~$38 mil at 12:01 am?
Moses ShamMoses
Analyst
Posts: 3,551
And1: 1,463
Joined: Nov 28, 2012
   

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#18 » by Moses ShamMoses » Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:05 pm

Best strategy is identify a few guys that are on our "dream list" for MLE (Bullock, Morris, etc.), make the offer but also not overreact if they say No Thanks. Then, Sit back and watch the dominos fall and look to pickup guys off the bargain bin like we did with Zaza and GR III. We do not need to offer top dollar to anyone in our financial position. We need to be prudent and not pick up any more "bad contracts".
Jeff Van Gundy on his brother's Pistons: 'He took over the Titanic and it's sinking even quicker'
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,257
And1: 5,245
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#19 » by Kilo » Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:23 pm

Wasn't Mook mostly disliked by folks here when he played for the Pistons because he would block Stanley's PT and was sort of a ball hog?
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,907
And1: 18,048
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: MLE targets in the offseason 

Post#20 » by Snakebites » Sun Feb 17, 2019 7:55 pm

Kilo wrote:Wasn't Mook mostly disliked by folks here when he played for the Pistons because he would block Stanley's PT and was sort of a ball hog?

I thought he was a ballhog. He eventually grew on me a little, but I don't recall being super upset when we lost him.

Return to Detroit Pistons