DarkAzcura wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Tatum and Brown were starters to begin the season. Who would you have started in Gordon's place at the beginning of the year? Rozier? I don't think Mook, Baynes, and Smart aren't the type to be irked if another vet was starting instead of them. Morris was thriving from the start even in his bench role.
The team started 7-2 then 9-6. As a coach, at what point do you say, "this **** ain't working. We need a lineup change?" Hayward was relegated to the second unit on the 17th game.
Baynes. There was no reason to shift off from our lineup from last year.
Everyone keeps talking about Brown and Tatum potentially being be ones held back by Hayward receiving minutes. I 100% doubt Tatum or Brown care whatsoever that Hayward started over Baynes. I doubt anyone cared, and I’m sure it was cool with Baynes. The only one who had any right to be annoyed with Hayward’s return was Morris, and honestly, who cares about Morris.
Brown got yanked early on because he played selfishly. If Hayward went out there and played wrecklessly and selfishly, he would had been yanked too. This thing about Brown having a shorter leash vs Hayward is weird to me. If anything, if I were Brown, I would be annoyed that I had a shorter leash than Tatum, who also plays selfishly quite a lot and is rarely pulled for it despite being younger.
If the young guys were really thrown off by Hayward, they need to grow up. Hayward was a great teammate all year long. Barely anyone in his position would had accepted the bench role as well as he did.
As much as I appreciate Morris’ heart in the most recent series, if Hayward and Stevens were being treated unfairly because the kids couldn’t get out of their own head, Ainge should had traded Morris. That would had solved almost all of this crying about roles and minutes on its own without improperly scapegoating Hayward.
The more I think about it, the root cause of this season does unfortunately fall back on Ainge, and I’m a huge Ainge fan. He has always dismissed chemistry as an important factor of a team’s success (see Perk trade), but the league is changing. Chemistry matters now even if it didn’t in the 80s and 90s. He needs to keep up.
Your missing the externalities and pecking order of it all. Brown lost both minutes and shot attempts to begin the season because Hayward played over Baynes. Tatum was consistently benched for long two’s, but Hayward was rarely punished for playing passive and passing up shots.
Its easy to say young players just need to deal. The harder answer to accept is that Stevens treated Hayward like a dad treated his kid in little league. Hayward is a good person, but he wasnt ready for the role he was given to begin the year after his second surgery 11 months ago.
FWIW, I agree about your critique on Ainge. He knows of the ‘too many players’ theory because Morey believes in it and those two have a similar mindset. When Morris asked to be dealt last summer [per reload], Ainge shouldve acquiesced. He probably shouldve dealt Rozier too, though I get why he didnt. Having too many people that are focused on their future earnings as opposed to winning in the present is a very bad thing, IMO— we fell victim to this last season.